S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Technology, AI Research & Insights
Featured Assessments
Our Methodology
Methodology & Participation
Reference Tools
S&P Global
S&P Global Offerings
S&P Global
Technology, AI Research & Insights
Featured Assessments
Our Methodology
Methodology & Participation
Reference Tools
S&P Global
S&P Global Offerings
S&P Global
This edition takes a deep dive into how the war in the Middle East is reshaping energy and commodity markets, with articles examining Asia's strategies amid trade route disruptions, rising power demand and shifting approaches in energy transition.
Asia’s biggest crude-importing economies moved quickly to cut chokepoint risk after Middle East conflict disrupted seaborne flows through the Strait of Hormuz.
South Korea, China, India and Japan did not abandon Middle Eastern barrels, but redesigned procurement and logistics to add redundancy, widen crude slates and secure optionality across the Americas, Africa, Russia and the Mediterranean. Refiners rerouted via the Red Sea where possible, leaned more on UAE and alternative grades, and increased inventory buffers, including strategic stockpiles and overseas storage plans. The shift reframes security of supply as an active feedstock strategy, not a default supply assumption.
Supply diversity alone does not guarantee supply security. The Strait of Hormuz crisis has made that clear, because even when sources broaden, critical commodities can still concentrate in routes that can be targeted, mined or disrupted.
As traffic slowed, starts and stops followed diplomacy and then tightened again with renewed attacks on ships and infrastructure, leaving shippers and refiners to manage uncertainty in real time. That gap between diversified supply on paper and secure delivery in practice exposed how quickly war-risk premiums, transit delays and operational constraints can turn normal supply chains into emergency ones, especially for importers with limited stocks.