S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Solutions
Capabilities
Delivery Platforms
Our Methodology
Methodology & Participation
Reference Tools
Featured Events
S&P Global
S&P Global Offerings
S&P Global
Research & Insights
Solutions
Capabilities
Delivery Platforms
Our Methodology
Methodology & Participation
Reference Tools
Featured Events
S&P Global
S&P Global Offerings
S&P Global
Research & Insights
Crude Oil, Maritime & Shipping, LNG, Wet Freight, Dry Freight, Containers
May 22, 2025
By Max Lin
HIGHLIGHTS
USTR targets perceived Chinese maritime dominance
Higher costs for Chinese-owned, operated and built ships
Crude, LNG, container shipping all could be affected
The US Trade Representative has announced additional port fees on foreign vessels and marine equipment that mainly target Chinese shipping, which are set to alter trade flows and freight market dynamics.
The measures, unveiled following a yearlong Section 301 investigation, aim to boost US shipbuilding and counter China's dominance in global maritime sectors amid trade tensions between the world's two largest economies.
"We view the USTR 301 port fees proposal as both significant and symbolic, indicating that China's growing maritime influence is finally under scrutiny by the US," S&P Global Commodity Insights analysts said. "Should the port fees be implemented, the consequences are likely to severely disrupt global trade, particularly affecting US EXIM trade."
US energy and agricultural producers, as well as many other market players, have pushed back on the USTR, arguing those fees would result in higher import and exports costs for American companies and hurt the economy.
The USTR published its first proposal on the port fees in February before watering them down significantly last month, having received some 600 public comments, most of them negative.
The fees will come into force on Oct. 14 based on the current proposal, and the USTR has suggested they are not subject to further review aside from those on Chinese-made cargo-handing equipment.
But in hearings earlier this month, some trade groups, including the International Chamber of Shipping, still called on the government agency to rethink the proposal as the US and China could find trade resolutions in summer.
Without further revisions, Chinese shipowners and operators are expected to stop trading in the US due to high costs, while third-country shipping firms deploy non-Chinese-built ships to the US.
USTR port fees
Ship type | Date | Fee |
Chinese-owned/operated ships of all kinds | Oct. 14, 2025 | $50/net ton |
April 17, 2026 | $80/net ton | |
April 17, 2027 | $110/net ton | |
April 17, 2028 | $140/net ton | |
Chinese-built tankers and dry bulk carriers | Oct. 14, 2025 | $18/net ton |
April 17, 2026 | $23/net ton | |
April 17, 2027 | $28/net ton | |
April 17, 2028 | $33/net ton | |
Chinese-built containerships | Oct. 14, 2025 | $120/container |
April 17, 2026 | $153/container | |
April 17, 2027 | $195/container | |
April 17, 2028 | $250/container | |
Foreign-built car carriers | Oct. 14, 2025 | $150/CEU |
LNG exports requirements on US ships | April 17, 2028 | 1% |
April 17, 2029 | 2% | |
... | ||
April 17, 2047 | 15% | |
Exemption | ||
US-owned or US-flagged ships; empty ships; ships of 4,000 TEU or less; ships of 55,000 dwt or less; | ||
ships with 80,000 dwt bulk capacity or smaller; ships coming to US from less than 2,000 nm away; | ||
chemical tankers; laker vessels |
Wet bulk
Dry bulk
Container
Wet bulk
Dry bulk
Container
Wet bulk
Dry bulk
Container