Register with us today

and in less than 60 seconds continue your access to:Latest news headlinesAnalytical topics and featuresCommodities videos, podcast & blogsSample market prices & dataSpecial reportsSubscriber notes & daily commodity email alerts

Already have an account?

Log in to register

Forgot Password

In this list

UK, US energy stimulus packages 'weighted heavily in favor of fossil fuels': Wartsila

Agriculture | Biofuels | Energy | Oil | Crude Oil | Refined Products | Metals | Steel | Shipping | Tankers | Coronavirus

Market Movers Americas, Nov 23-27: Markets watch coronavirus surge, progress on stimulus

Electric Power

Platts M2MS-Power

Electric Power | Renewables | LNG | Infrastructure Utilities

Caribbean Energy Conference, 21st

Oil | Crude Oil | Refined Products

Crude oil futures extend uptrend on vaccine reports, US political developments

Electric Power | Renewables | Natural Gas (North American) | Crude Oil | Steel | Petrochemicals

Commodity Tracker: 5 charts to watch this week

UK, US energy stimulus packages 'weighted heavily in favor of fossil fuels': Wartsila

Highlights

54% of G20 funds focused on fossil fuels

Missed opportunity to promote sustainability

UK net zero trajectory modelled

London — UK and US stimulus packages for energy announced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic are heavily weighted to support legacy fossil fuel energy, according to an Oct. 29 report by Finland-based engineering company Wartsila.

Not registered?

Receive daily email alerts, subscriber notes & personalize your experience.

Register Now

The packages miss the opportunity to create green jobs and accelerate the transition to a flexible, renewable energy-powered economy, Wartsila said, referencing data compiled by Energypolicytracker.org.

The tracker shows that, of $403 billion allocated by G20 governments to new or amended energy policy instruments since the beginning of the pandemic, at least $216 billion relate to oil, gas and coal support versus $146 billion to clean energy support and $40 billion to "other energy".

For the US the split between fossil and clean energy support is stark, at $72 billion for fossil and $27 billion for clean energy.

The UK is only slightly better at $39 billion for fossil and $16 billion for clean energy. The tracker is constantly updated as policies evolve.

"This level is not aligned with the UK's ambitious targets to achieve 57% greenhouse gas reduction by 2030 compared with 1990 levels and net-zero by 2050," Wartsila said in the report.

If UK energy stimulus was entirely focused on renewables, the sector could achieve a share of 60% in the generation mix by 2025, it said.

"This would cut power sector carbon emissions by 58% compared to current levels and put the UK on track to meet its net-zero emissions target by 2050," it said.

A cost-optimal 60% renewable power system in the UK would consist of 60 GW renewable capacity (existing and new), 7 GW of battery energy storage and 14 GW of flexible gas-based generation enabled for future carbon-neutral fuels, the report said.

This fits with Wartsila's product offering of battery storage units and gas-fired generation sets that in future should be able to run on hydrogen.