Research — July 23, 2026

Buyer Insight | Data Center Operations and Intelligence Platforms

SNL Image

Enterprise buyers evaluating DCOI vendors should begin by defining the primary operational problem they need to solve — e.g., modernizing the system of record, establishing gray space telemetry and control, or using AI to optimize operations — rather than comparing vendors as if they all serve the same functions. Procurement teams should assess how much integration work each option requires across BMS, EPMS, DCIM and IT systems; whether the platform supports the buyer’s preferred deployment model and security requirements; and whether pricing scales predictably as telemetry volume, sites or managed assets grow. Buyers should also scrutinize hardware dependence, API openness, implementation complexity and support models to avoid lock-in and unexpected expansion costs. The strongest candidates will demonstrate measurable outcomes in the buyer’s environment, including faster deployment, improved capacity utilization, reduced cooling or power waste and lower operational risk.

SNL Image

Introduction

Data centers are broadly governed by three core software platforms: building management systems (BMS) for facility controls, electrical power management systems (EPMS) for power monitoring, and data center infrastructure management (DCIM) systems for visibility into IT white space. Historically, these systems operated in isolated domains. However, multiple trends are converging to necessitate greater integration and interoperability. AI-driven workloads are pushing power densities higher, driving the need for greater control and flexibility in power systems as well as for new cooling infrastructure. At the same time, enterprises and regulatory bodies are tightening sustainability targets, and operators are demanding faster crossdomain decision-making. This convergence is laying the groundwork or a federated control architecture spanning building, power and IT. DCIM platforms have historically helped organizations monitor the IT white space in data center infrastructure by connecting capacity, assets, workflows and environmental conditions into a single operational view. The evolution of the ecosystem expands the vendor universe to include intelligence and optimization layers that can ingest cross-domain telemetry data to make recommendations and introduce automations. We refer to the expanded set of platforms, which increasingly integrate with and manage data center gray space — including cooling infrastructure (both air and liquid) and power supplies — as data center operations and intelligence (DCOI), reflecting an evolution from DCIM. DCIM has long raised questions about what infrastructure is included and how it is managed, beyond simple monitoring dashboards. Next-generation DCOI vendors are extending actionable intelligence to gray space and cooling workflows, achieving energy efficiency and uptime for intensive AI workloads. The market spans vendors ranging from pure-play software specialists to hardware manufacturers with bundled software platforms, from decades-old on-premises suites to cloud-native SaaS entrants launched in the past five years.

Key Findings

AI infrastructure demands per-minute telemetry and crossdomain power visibility.

GPU-dense deployments have compressed the acceptable window between anomaly detection and cooling response from minutes to seconds. DCIM platforms that rely on polling intervals of five minutes or more are insufficient for AI factory environments. Buyers are prioritizing platforms that ingest high-resolution sensor data, predictively model thermal behavior, and can trigger automated or autonomous responses across power and cooling systems.

Liquid cooling readiness is a new baseline requirement.

As direct liquid cooling (DLC) proliferates across hyperscale and enterprise AI deployments, platforms must evolve beyond air-cooled models. Buyers are evaluating vendors on their ability to monitor coolant distribution unit (CDU)-technology cooling system (TCS) loops, model hybrid air/liquid environments, and integrate with CDU telemetry. Vendors lacking visibility into liquid-cooling systems face growing gaps in their addressable market.

BMS/EPMS/DCIM convergence is moving from road map to requirement.

The three historically siloed control domains — building management, electrical power management and data center infrastructure management — are converging under the pressure of net-zero sustainability mandates and AI power density. Buyers at large entersprises and colocation operators are asking for federated dashboards that span both gray and white space, enabling coordinated capacity decisions and simulation capabilities across the full power chain from utility entry to rack.

Cloud-native architecture is displacing legacy on-premises platforms for new deployments.

Cloud-native DCIM offerings are demonstrating that rapid deployment, transparent pricing and enterprise-grade security are achievable without the multiquarter implementation cycles associated with legacy platforms. This is shifting buyer expectations for total cost of ownership and time to value, even among buyers that retain some on-premises infrastructure.

AI-driven optimization overlays are emerging as a distinct purchasing category.

A new class of vendors — including EkkoSense, Lucend and Phaidra AI — are entering the DCOI ecosystem not as full platform replacements but as analytics and control layers that layer atop existing BMS and DCIM data. These vendors make compelling return on investment (ROI) claims — asserting 25%-40% potential reduction in cooling energy use and a sub-one-year payback period — without requiring infrastructure replacement, creating a new buying motion distinct from traditional procurement.

Security and compliance have become shortlist criteria, not afterthoughts.

As DCIM and DCOI platforms handle sensitive operational data about critical infrastructure layouts, power chains and facility dependencies, enterprise buyers are applying the same security scrutiny they apply to enterprise software as a service. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and published trust centers are table stakes for shortlisted vendors, particularly in financial services, government and healthcare deployments.

451 Research subscribers can access the full report here

Not a subscriber? Connect with our sales team to learn how to get access to this report along with additional AI & technology insights and data from 451 Research.