Register with us today

and in less than 60 seconds continue your access to:Latest news headlinesAnalytical topics and featuresCommodities videos, podcast & blogsSample market prices & dataSpecial reportsSubscriber notes & daily commodity email alerts

Already have an account?

Log in to register

Forgot Password

In this list

Tariffs on Canadian aluminum 'step in wrong direction': US Chamber of Commerce

Agriculture | Energy | Coal | Electric Power | Natural Gas | Oil | Metals | Petrochemicals | Shipping

2020 US Elections

Electric Power

Platts Forward Curves – Gas and Power

Electric Power | Renewables | LNG | Infrastructure Utilities

Caribbean Energy Conference, 21st

Electricity | Coal | Emissions | Electric Power | Metals | Non-Ferrous | Steel

Evraz plans $1 billion capex aimed at expanding steel beams and rail output

Metals | Raw Materials | Corporates

Adding value to iron ore, at a cost: Australia’s magnetite curse strikes again

Tariffs on Canadian aluminum 'step in wrong direction': US Chamber of Commerce


Trade with allies supports US business: Chamber of Commerce

Move likely to trigger retaliatory measures: trade group

Pittsburgh — The Trump administration's announcement Aug. 6 that tariffs on aluminum imports from Canada were returning represents "a step in the wrong direction," according to US Chamber of Commerce Head of International Affairs Myron Brilliant.

Not registered?

Receive daily email alerts, subscriber notes & personalize your experience.

Register Now

"These tariffs will raise costs for American manufacturers, are opposed by most US aluminum producers, and will draw retaliation against US exports, just as they did before," Brilliant said in a statement Aug. 7. "We urge the administration to reconsider this move."

Brilliant said American businesses are increasingly more dependent on global trade to foster growth and job creation.

"We must take care to uphold commitments we've made to our allies to keep markets open; otherwise, foreign retaliation will hit US exports and jobs," Brilliant said.

Conversely, the Office of the United States Trade Representative said the administration's decision to put the tariff back in place was driven by the need to address rising imports of aluminum from Canada.

"The surge has intensified in recent months, despite a contraction in US demand," the USTR's office said in a statement. "To ensure the continued integrity and effectiveness of the national security measures [President Trump] adopted under Section 232, the US has reimposed a tariff on the surging imports."

Augustine Lo, an attorney at international law firm Dorsey & Whitney who focuses on export control matters, said the tariff may have a pronounced influence on the domestic market since it targets the largest share of Canadian aluminum exports to the US.

"Assuming this 10% tariff proceeds, it could significantly impact the aluminum market, from competing US producers of primary aluminum, to producers of secondary aluminum from recycled goods that could compete with imported primary aluminum, and to downstream users of aluminum across all industries," Lo said in a statement sent to S&P Global Platts.

Lo said Canada would likely impose retaliatory tariffs against the US, though the dispute should not lead to the unraveling of the recently implemented US-Mexico-Canada Agreement.