Register with us today

and in less than 60 seconds continue your access to:Latest news headlinesAnalytical topics and featuresCommodities videos, podcast & blogsSample market prices & dataSpecial reportsSubscriber notes & daily commodity email alerts

Already have an account?

Log in to register

Forgot Password

In this list
Electric Power | Natural Gas

Judge asks PG&E to explain $5 billion in dividends, political spending amid grid neglect

LNG | Natural Gas | Natural Gas (North American)

Historic price volatility envelops US, Texas natural gas markets

Electric Power

Platts Forward Curves – Gas and Power

Electric Power | Renewables | LNG | Infrastructure Utilities

Caribbean Energy Conference, 21st

Natural Gas | Oil | Crude Oil

UAE's Abu Dhabi forms new board for ADNOC amid spending spree

Electric Power | Renewables | LNG | Natural Gas

Fuel for Thought: For green hydrogen to catch up with blue, it's a long ride in India

Judge asks PG&E to explain $5 billion in dividends, political spending amid grid neglect

Sparked by a new report July 10 in The Wall Street Journal on Pacific Gas and Electric's yearslong knowing neglect of its 18,500-mile transmission system, a federal judge overseeing the utility's probation case related to wildfires and a 2010 gas pipeline explosion on the same day ordered the PG&E Corp. subsidiary to respond "paragraph-by-paragraph" on the accuracy of the article.

Not registered?

Receive daily email alerts, subscriber notes & personalize your experience.

Register Now

In addition, Judge William Alsup of the US District Court for the Northern District of California asked Pacific Gas and Electric, or PG&E, to explain why it paid nearly $5 billion in dividends to shareholders in the years prior to filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January, when the utility was reportedly well aware of its hazardous electric system.

Alsup also asked PG&E to detail its political campaign contributions since 2017 and explain "why those campaign contributions were more important [than] replacing or repairing the aging transmission lines described by the Wall Street Journal article and removing or trimming the backlog of hazard trees, and increasing vegetation management."

PG&E is "aware of the court's order and [is] currently reviewing it," a spokesman for the utility said in an email. "PG&E's most important responsibility is the safety of our customers and the communities we serve."

The order comes as PG&E and its corporate parent are entangled in one of the most complicated bankruptcy cases in U.S. history, triggered by potentially in excess of $30 billion in liabilities related to deadly and devastating wildfires in 2017 and 2018.

The Journal article revealed additional detail on the utility's knowledge about safety risks related to its electric system, an allegation that is also at the center of a currently stayed securities fraud lawsuit against PG&E. Judge Dennis Montali, who is presiding the Chapter 11 cases in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, in June asked PG&E and the plaintiffs, including the Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, to seek a settlement in that case.

-- Garrett Hering, S&P Global Market Intelligence,

-- Edited by Joe Fisher,