In this list

US court dismisses industry challenge to Oregon fuel standards

Energy | Oil

Platts Global Alert - Oil

Crude Oil | Natural Gas | Natural Gas (North America) | Shipping

Market Movers Americas, Dec 4-8: US crude weighs OPEC+ decision, Panama Canal continues to impact shipping

Oil | Energy Transition | Energy

APPEC 2024

Energy Transition | Emissions | Carbon

COP28: Article 6 adoption progress shaky as parties disagree on removals, methodologies

Energy | Oil | Crude Oil

Dated Brent Price Assessment

Agriculture | Grains | Crude Oil | Energy Transition | Emissions | Natural Gas | Oil & Gas

Commodity Tracker: 6 charts to watch this week

For full access to real-time updates, breaking news, analysis, pricing and data visualization subscribe today.

Subscribe Now

US court dismisses industry challenge to Oregon fuel standards

  • Author
  • Brian Scheid
  • Editor
  • Keiron Greenhalgh
  • Commodity
  • Oil

Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday upheld Oregon's low-carbon fuel standards, dismissing a challenge brought by US refiners and truckers.

Not registered?

Receive daily email alerts, subscriber notes & personalize your experience.

Register Now

The American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Trucking Associations and the Consumer Energy Alliance challenged Oregon's standards, known as the Clean Fuels Program, arguing it violates the US Constitution by discriminating against fuels produced outside Oregon and by attempting to regulate commerce outside the state.

But in a 2-1 decision released Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found the standards discriminated against fuels based on lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions not on state of origin. The decision backed an earlier decision from a lower court.

"The fact that the program labels fuels by state of origin does not render it discriminatory, as these labels are not the basis for any differential treatment," US Circuit Judge Andrew Hurwitz wrote in the decision.

The program requires Oregon fuel importers to reduce the carbon intensity of fuel sold in the state through deficits and credits with an aim of decreasing greenhouse gas emission from transportation fuel by 10% over 10 years.

Under the program, importers of gasoline, diesel, ethanol and biodiesel can buy or sell credits, store them for future use or use them to offset deficits.

In a dissenting opinion Friday, US Circuit Judge N. Randy Smith backed the arguments from refiners and truckers that the program was discriminatory to out-of-state fuels.

"Out-of-state entities bear the full brunt of the law's burden, even though all fuel producers (including in-state entities) contribute to greenhouse gas emissions (and consequently global warming)," Smith wrote. "At the same time, in-state entities not only avoid the burden of the law, they also receive a subsidy from the out-of-state entities in the sale of their valuable credits." -- Brian Scheid,

-- Edited by Keiron Greenhalgh,