In this list
Natural Gas

Russia-Ukraine legal dispute intensifies with new $12 billion lawsuit

Crude Oil | Natural Gas | Natural Gas (North America) | Upstream

Platts Upstream Indicator

Commodities | Crude Oil | Energy Transition | Shipping | Energy

Grangemouth’s closure: insights into the changing global refining landscape

Oil | Energy Transition | Energy

APPEC 2024

Natural Gas | Oil & Gas | Coal | Energy Transition | Crude Oil | Emissions

COP28: OPEC urges members to reject fossil fuel phaseout

Natural Gas

UK NBP Gas Price Assessment

Crude Oil | Electric Power | Electric Power Electricity | Energy Transition | Carbon | Emissions | Renewables | LNG | Natural Gas | Natural Gas Shale Gas | Refined Products | Fuel Oil | Shipping | Bunker Fuel | Marine Fuel | Oil & Gas

Insight Conversation: Ezran Mahadzir, Petronas LNG

For full access to real-time updates, breaking news, analysis, pricing and data visualization subscribe today.

Subscribe Now

Russia-Ukraine legal dispute intensifies with new $12 billion lawsuit


Naftogaz makes new claim over 2018-2019 transit

In response to Gazprom claim from July

Stockholm court may rule on case in 2021

  • Author
  • Stuart Elliott    Alexander Bor
  • Editor
  • Alisdair Bowles
  • Commodity
  • Natural Gas

Kiev — With just eight weeks until the controversial gas agreement between Russia's Gazprom and Ukraine's Naftogaz expires, the legal quagmire surrounding the contract is becoming yet more complex.

Naftogaz has now filed a brand new claim to the Stockholm court of arbitration over the 10-year deal, seeking $12 billion in compensation from Gazprom for its refusal to accept market-based gas transit tariffs in 2018 and 2019.

The lawsuit was in response to Gazprom's own new claim from July this year seeking about $6 billion from Naftogaz for "unfair" transit contract obligations.

Given that Gazprom has said that it would not agree a new transit deal with Naftogaz unless the numerous legal cases between the parties are resolved, the stakes have never been higher given the risk of disruption to Russian gas flows via Ukraine to Europe from January 1.

Yuriy Vitrenko, the commercial director at Naftogaz who leads the company's legal team, said at the weekend the arbitration court was expected to rule on the Gazprom claim and Naftogaz counterclaim in 2021.

"In the new arbitration, we point out that there have been significant changes in the way transit tariffs are set since 2009," Vitrenko said.

"Our transit tariffs don't reflect the level of transit tariffs in the European market. It would be logical to set transit tariffs in line with modern European norms," he said, adding: "The tariff must reflect the real costs of the operator if these costs are in line with the costs of existing efficient operators."


The latest arbitration tit-for-tat follows a ruling from the Stockholm court in February 2018 that found in favor of Naftogaz to the tune of some $2.56 billion across two cases -- one on supply and one on transit.

This could have marked the end of the dispute between the two companies over the agreement, which began in 2014, had the Russian side paid up.

However, Gazprom instead appealed the verdicts and then filed a separate request to have the agreement terminated completely.

Gazprom in August said hearings at the Svea court of appeal in Sweden against the main ruling in the supply case is set for February 2020, while its appeal in the transit case is scheduled for September-October 2020.

Its request for the entire agreement to be canceled will be heard only in April or May 2021.

There are also other appeal hearings set to be held in coming months around the case related to moves by Naftogaz to seize Gazprom assets in Europe in lieu of the $2.56 billion arbitration award.

Gazprom has offered to Naftogaz the chance to start over with a clean slate provided all legal disputes were dropped.

"There are known cases in international practice when disputes between companies were settled out of court, and we are offering a zero option whereby all court proceedings would cease, all lawsuits would be withdrawn, and we would draw a line under this whole affair," Miller said last month.

Naftogaz has repeatedly said, however, that it would not drop the arbitration case -- or others including efforts to enforce a $6.7 billion penalty imposed by Ukraine's anti-monopoly committee for Gazprom 's alleged abuse of its monopoly gas supply status.


Vitrenko said the $12 billion claim related to its demand for higher tariffs.

Complying with court procedures and schedule, Gazprom formally submitted its claims on July 14, 2019, which gave Naftogaz time to respond with its own counterclaims that have now been submitted to the same court.

"We are defending ourselves," Vitrenko said.

Naftogaz, he said, officially asked Gazprom on May 13, 2018 to change the gas transit tariffs to reflect market-based formulas used in Europe.

The claims for the new tariffs cover the period between March 13, 2018 and January 1, 2020, Vitrenko said.

Gazprom could not be reached for immediate comment Tuesday.

Vitrenko said the $12 billion claim reflected a difference of $11.8 billion between the new tariff level and what was paid by Gazprom.

He said Naftogaz was also claiming $200 million for Gazprom's failure to deliver 4 Bcm of gas in 2018 and 5 Bcm in 2019 (as stipulated in the February 2018 Stockholm court ruling) as it had had to buy more expensive gas in its place.

Naftogaz halted direct purchases of gas from Gazprom in November 2015 and has relied on its own production and European imports to meet demand.

-- Stuart Elliott and Alexander Bor,

-- Edited by Alisdair Bowles,