Skip to Content Skip to Menu Skip to Footer

S&P Dow Jones Indices — 10 Mar, 2021

A Change in Fortune

This article is reprinted from the Indexology blog of S&P Dow Jones Indices.

Three months ago, we observed that times of severe underperformance for Equal Weight can bode well for future performance(opens in a new tab). This reflection had become reality by the end of February. After almost four years of underperformance, the S&P 500® Equal Weight Index(opens in a new tab) outperformed the S&P 500(opens in a new tab) by 1.6% over the past 12 months(opens in a new tab), as we see in Exhibit 1. This result may be the beginning of a trend in mean-reversion that we observe from the exhibit’s historical peaks and troughs.

Exhibit 1: Historical Return Differential

The turning of the tide for Equal Weight was primarily driven by strength in smaller caps, as Equal Weight has a small-cap bias. Exhibit 2 shows the strong outperformance of the S&P MidCap 400®(opens in a new tab) and S&P SmallCap 600®(opens in a new tab) relative to their large-cap counterpart.

Exhibit 2: Smaller-Caps Outperformed

The impact of smaller-cap outperformance at a sector level is noticeable from Exhibit 3’s 12-month attribution of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index versus the S&P 500. Equal weighting within Financials and Industrials was a key contributor to the recovery in Equal Weight.

Exhibit 3: Equal Weighting within Financials and Industrials

In addition, Equal Weight has a natural anti-momentum bias, as by definition the strategy sells relative winners and purchases relative losers at each rebalance. Exhibit 4 illustrates that the S&P 500 Momentum was the worst performing factor in February(opens in a new tab), furthering Equal Weight’s positive trajectory.

Exhibit 4: S&P 500 Momentum

The comeback of smaller-caps and Equal Weight might have positive implications for active managers,(opens in a new tab) as their portfolios tend to be closer to equal than cap weighted(opens in a new tab). Exhibit 5 plots the underperformance of large-cap funds compared to the relative performance of the S&P 400TM versus the S&P 500, as a proxy measure for smaller-cap outperformance. We notice that the three years when most active managers outperformed (2005, 2007, and 2009) all coincided with smaller-cap outperformance.

Exhibit 5: Smaller-Cap Outperformance

Finally, we’ve written previously about how the current environment compares to the tech bubble of the late 1990s.(opens in a new tab) Concentration levels in the cap-weighted S&P 500 exceed those of 1999; an equal weight alternative could potentially offer above-average diversification benefits.

The posts on this blog are opinions, not advice. Please read our Disclaimers.


Content Type

Language