S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Featured Products
Ratings & Benchmarks
By Topic
Market Insights
About S&P Global
Corporate Responsibility
Culture & Engagement
Investor Relations
Featured Products
Ratings & Benchmarks
By Topic
Market Insights
About S&P Global
Corporate Responsibility
Culture & Engagement
Investor Relations
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Language
S&P Dow Jones Indices — 10 Mar, 2021
By Anu Ganti
This article is reprinted from the Indexology blog of S&P Dow Jones Indices.
Three months ago, we observed that times of severe underperformance for Equal Weight can bode well for future performance(opens in a new tab). This reflection had become reality by the end of February. After almost four years of underperformance, the S&P 500® Equal Weight Index(opens in a new tab) outperformed the S&P 500(opens in a new tab) by 1.6% over the past 12 months(opens in a new tab), as we see in Exhibit 1. This result may be the beginning of a trend in mean-reversion that we observe from the exhibit’s historical peaks and troughs.
The turning of the tide for Equal Weight was primarily driven by strength in smaller caps, as Equal Weight has a small-cap bias. Exhibit 2 shows the strong outperformance of the S&P MidCap 400®(opens in a new tab) and S&P SmallCap 600®(opens in a new tab) relative to their large-cap counterpart.
The impact of smaller-cap outperformance at a sector level is noticeable from Exhibit 3’s 12-month attribution of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index versus the S&P 500. Equal weighting within Financials and Industrials was a key contributor to the recovery in Equal Weight.
In addition, Equal Weight has a natural anti-momentum bias, as by definition the strategy sells relative winners and purchases relative losers at each rebalance. Exhibit 4 illustrates that the S&P 500 Momentum was the worst performing factor in February(opens in a new tab), furthering Equal Weight’s positive trajectory.
The comeback of smaller-caps and Equal Weight might have positive implications for active managers,(opens in a new tab) as their portfolios tend to be closer to equal than cap weighted(opens in a new tab). Exhibit 5 plots the underperformance of large-cap funds compared to the relative performance of the S&P 400TM versus the S&P 500, as a proxy measure for smaller-cap outperformance. We notice that the three years when most active managers outperformed (2005, 2007, and 2009) all coincided with smaller-cap outperformance.
Finally, we’ve written previously about how the current environment compares to the tech bubble of the late 1990s.(opens in a new tab) Concentration levels in the cap-weighted S&P 500 exceed those of 1999; an equal weight alternative could potentially offer above-average diversification benefits.
The posts on this blog are opinions, not advice. Please read our Disclaimers.