articles Corporate /en/research-insights/articles/factor-based-investing-in-fixed-income-a-case-study-of-the-us-investment-grade-corporate-bond-market content
BY CONTINUING TO USE THIS SITE, YOU ARE AGREEING TO OUR USE OF COOKIES. REVIEW OUR
PRIVACY & COOKIE NOTICE
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform

 /


Looking for more?

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *

* Required

In This List

Factor-Based Investing in Fixed Income: a Case Study of the U.S. Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Market

S&P Global Platts

As Texas temperatures rise, will ERCOT electricity prices boil over?

S&P Global Ratings

The Future of Banking Regulators to Decide if the Crypto Stars Align for Libra

S&P Global Platts

Global oil reserves data is muddled, but does it really matter? Fuel for Thought

S&P Global Ratings

For the U.S. Expansion, are Trade Troubles Just a Flesh Wound?


Factor-Based Investing in Fixed Income: a Case Study of the U.S. Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Market

Factor-based investing is a well-established concept in equities that has been supported by over four decades of research, testing, and documentation. However, factor-based investing in fixed income remains in its nascent stages. Recent studies have shown that the majority of fixed income active managers’ risk can be explained by systematic risk factors. Our analysis finds that factor-based fixed income strategies implemented in a rules-based, transparent index can represent an alternative tool for fixed income portfolios. S&P DJI has examined a theoretical stylized example of a multi-factor index portfolio. This theoretical index portfolio attempted to reflect value and low-volatility factors existent in the U.S. investment-grade corporate bond universe.

Executive Summary

  • As an increasing number of investors adopt risk-factor-based asset allocation, interest in smart beta fixed income strategies may be poised to grow.
  • Factors may be even more important in fixed income, as systematic risk constitutes a significant proportion of bond total risk.
  • Exposures to factors have long been utilized by active fixed income managers to achieve targeted risk/return characteristics. The majority of fixed income managers’ risk can be explained by exposures to factors.
  • Factors can be systematically reflected in a rules-based, transparent manner.
  • We seek to identify value and low-volatility factors in the U.S. investment-grade corporate bond universe.
  • Higher exposure to the value factor may be used to seek enhanced returns, while lower exposure to the low-volatility factor may be used to mitigate risk.
  • Back-tested results show that a multi-factor Index could maintain a target risk profile (ratings and duration) in line with the broad-based benchmark, while having the potential to provide higher risk-adjusted return.
  • High portfolio turnover remains a potential significant implementation challenge.