articles Corporate /en/research-insights/articles/global-trade-at-a-crossroads content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *

* Required

In this list

Global Trade at a Crossroads

S&P Global Ratings

COP24 Special Edition Shining A Light On Climate Finance

S&P Dow Jones Indices

Considering the Risk from Future Carbon Prices

Empowering Public Private Collaboration in Infrastructure

S&P Global

How Can Banks Apply a Quantitative Lens on Climate Risk Exposure

Global Trade at a Crossroads

On March 8, 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump approved the imposition of two new tariffs: 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum imports with Canada and Mexico exempted, effective March 23. Our latest series of research includes four articles which explore the possible impact of these tariffs on global trade.

U.S. States and Localities May Take Another Look at Budget Forecasts

In its 2018 sector outlook for U.S. states, S&P Global Ratings cited the potential for policy missteps as a leading risk to its baseline economic forecast for the year. President Trump's recent decision to impose import tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum is an example of this type of risk. While the tariffs could help make the steel and aluminum produced by some U.S. firms more competitive relative to lower cost imports, on balance a shift toward protectionist trade policies has negative implications for most state economies.

Download Article

U.S. Steel and Aluminium Tariffs Raise Risk of Retaliatory Spiral

  • The net impact on the U.S. economy is likely to be very small. While steel and aluminum producers may benefit, aerospace and defense, capital goods, and midstream energy could suffer from higher input costs.
  • U.S. steel imports represent just 2% of global production. While aluminum represents a larger percentage (6%), its tariff is lower. Consequently, we do not see steel and aluminum that would have otherwise been bound for the U.S. flooding global markets.
  • Posing a greater threat is the risk of retaliatory action by major U.S. trade partners (e.g. EU, China) triggering a trade war, hurting American exporters, global trade, and global economic growth.

Download Article

U.S. Steel And Aluminum Tariffs Will Likely Have Small Direct Impact But Risk Larger Knock-On Effects

  • The direct impact of the new tariffs is likely going to be very small. It will likely boost U.S.-based steel and aluminum producers at the risk of downstream manufacturers.
  • The impact on consumer price inflation will be less than a tenth of a percentage point. The fear is that these tariffs are just a start to a longer game of tit-for-tat tariff retaliations and pose a fundamental threat to the rules-based trading system.
  • To the extent trade helps cut down inefficiencies and increase total factor productivity, loss in potential trade points to further deterioration in the longer-run trend of productivity growth.

Download Article

Trump Tariffs Forge Better Credit Quality For U.S.-Based Steel And Aluminum Producers With A Protectionist Stance

  • Trade actions could underpin positive rating actions among U.S.-based steel and aluminum producers.
  • Low-speculative-grade rated issuers have the best prospects for higher ratings in the next 12-24 months.
  • Trade barriers will likely widen spreads with global prices and increase margins. Elevated prices could support stronger profits and cash flow, and boost refinancing of looming maturities.

Download Article

Considering the Risk from Future Carbon Prices

Along with the advent of the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement has come a growing understanding of the structural changes required across the global economy to shift to low- (or zero-) carbon, sustainable business practices.

The increasing regulation of carbon emissions through taxes, emissions trading schemes, and fossil fuel extraction fees is expected to feature prominently in global efforts to address climate change. Carbon prices are already implemented in 40 countries and 20 cities and regions. Average carbon prices could increase more than sevenfold to USD 120 per metric ton by 2030, as regulations aim to limit the average global temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius, in accordance with the Paris Agreement.

S&P Dow Jones Indices launched the S&P Carbon Price Risk Adjusted Indices to embed future carbon price risk into today’s index constituents.

Read the Full Report

Watch: Empowering Public Private Collaboration in Infrastructure

S&P Global CEO Doug Peterson speaks with Maha Eltobgy from the World Economic Forum, on their joint study that looks at how greater collaboration between the public and private sector can accelerate national infrastructure programmes.

How Can Banks Apply a Quantitative Lens on Climate Risk Exposure

Aligning with the Recommendations of the Taskforce on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)

Dec. 03 2018 — The signals are clear: central banks and regulators are stepping up action to address the potential systemic risks to financial markets that climate change poses.

This means it will become increasingly necessary for banks to develop a deeper understanding of how climate issues could affect their businesses and those they finance. By effectively managing and responding to these issues, banks can not only help mitigate the risks, but also seize the opportunities presented from the transition to a lower-carbon economy. Trucost has worked with banks for more than a decade to support their climate-related analysis. This paper provides practical guidance to help banks manage and report key climate-related metrics, no matter what level of ambition they may have.

This paper is organized into five sections:

I. What is the TCFD Framework?

II. Measuring the Carbon Footprint of a Bank

III. Translating Climate Exposure into Financial Risk

IV. Incorporating Scenario Analysis

V. Creating Opportunities

Access the Full Report
Read More