trending Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/n4uyi7fnelphq-ff8jubmg2 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform

 /


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

In this list

Texas regulators require Sharyland to re-file rate case

IFRS 9: Time is Running Out for Insurance Companies to Comply

5 Quant Research Traps to Avoid

S&P Global Market Intelligence

Wind Power by the Numbers: U.S., Canada and Mexico

CUSIP Identifier Requests for New U.S. Corporate Debt Surge in January


Texas regulators require Sharyland to re-file rate case

Texas regulatorsapproved a preliminary order Oct. 7 directing to re-file itspending rate case, a decision likely to postpone any ruling until mid-2017.

How the Public Utility Commission of Texas rules in the casecould have implications for whether real estate investment trusts, or REITs,remain a viable corporatestructure for electric utilities. Publicly traded REIT is the majorityowner of Sharyland Distribution& Transmission Services LLC, which leases its transmission anddistribution assets to Sharyland Utilities.

The procedural order adopted by the PUCT directs SharylandUtilities and SDTS to file two separate rate cases by the end of 2016, insteadof the consolidated case the two entities filed initially. The commission notedthat, "nothing," in the preliminary order required SDTS to be ownedby an entity treated as a REIT, "and any party may argue that maintainingREIT status is not in the public interest."

The commission also opted not to revisit in the preliminaryorder any "threshold issues." On Aug. 30, Sharyland submitted to the PUCT a jointproposal on the so-called threshold issues in the rate case, reached with PUCTstaff and several intervenors, that contained an acknowledgement that the aimof the process was to preserve the company's REIT status. Some analysts notedthe language was significant because it suggested the parties would avoidimposing terms on Sharyland that could result in InfraREIT generatinginsufficient qualifying income to maintain its REIT status.

By deferring adecision on the joint proposal and adopting a revised preliminaryorder requiring an amended rate filing, the PUCT may not take up key issuesaround the leases between Sharyland Utilities and SDTS until 2017. (TexasDocket No. 45414)