trending Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/kzwyooxvIPICpoqsTMidMw2 content esgSubNav
In This List

Ark. PSC staff recommends Entergy Arkansas rate increase


Insight Weekly: Energy crisis cripples Europe; i-bank incomes rise; US holiday sales outlook


Japan M&A By the Numbers: Q3 2022


Insight Weekly: Reviving nuclear power; 2023 outlook for US financials; PE funds fuel EV sector


Energy Evolution | A skills shortage imperils the global energy transition

Ark. PSC staff recommends Entergy Arkansas rate increase

The staff of the Arkansas Public Service Commission has recommended that Entergy Arkansas Inc., or EAI, be allowed a rate increase of $122.4 million, down from the utility's initial request of $122.9 million.

Analysts reacted positively to the news, and Entergy Corp. shares were up 4% on Oct. 4, compared with the S&P utilities index, which was up roughly 1% on the same day.

After reviewing EAI's capital component balances and cost rates, PSC staff on Oct. 4 recommended the $122.4 million rate hike, along with reducing the utility's benchmark rate of return on rate base from 4.67% to 4.64%. For long-term debt, staff is recommending a decrease from 5% to 4.32% for the cost rate of EAI's projected June 2018 issuance of a new 30-year bond worth $175 million. A decrease in the overall long-term debt cost rate from 4.36% to 4.31% was also recommended.

For short-term debt, staff recommended an increase in EAI's short-term debt cost rate from 0.65% to 0.79% due to supplemental information received by the PSC regarding the daily, weighted, average cost rate for EAI's money pool.

As for the rate increase amount of $122.4 million, Guggenheim Securities analyst Shahriar Pourreza wrote in an Oct. 4 note that "this is materially better than we as well as investors expected."

"Staff was very supportive/constructive with Entergy's capital and [operations and maintenance] requests for their regulated nuclear plant," Pourreza said in reference to the Arkansas Nuclear One plant. "Constructive recommendation from the staff (still pending commissioner order), the first test case in [Arkansas], could likely set precedent on a go forward basis — Regulated nuclear spend recovery will eventually work itself through, in our view, which has been our call."

"This constructive step forward with the 2018 [formula rate plan] proceeding, especially with the Arkansas prudency review, could go a long way to provide the much needed comfort that investors seek around [Entergy's] nuclear spending program, which includes both [operations and maintenance] and capital — a key driver of management's forward growth trajectory," he added.

Pourreza reiterated Guggenheim's "buy" rating for Entergy stock they "continue to like the story and see sizeable upside potential for [Entergy] shares — Investors should catch up as they continue to gain comfort; this is a good start."

Wells Fargo Securities analyst Neil Kalton shared sentiments with Pourreza, writing in an Oct. 5 note that staff's recommendation is "a positive data point and highly supportive of our thesis that the regulators and policy makers in [Entergy's] jurisdiction will view the company's nuclear cost improvement program as being legitimate expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business."

"Investors have been concerned that [Entergy] could incur nuclear cost disallowances," he added, "particularly after the [PSC] set aside the 2016 [formula rate plan] nuclear-related revenues for further scrutiny."

Kalton said a final decision by the PSC is expected by the end of 2017.