trending Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/3nzJBjIdKgfFQcYxR14-hQ2 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform

 /


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

If your company has a current subscription with S&P Global Market Intelligence, you can register as a new user for access to the platform(s) covered by your license at Market Intelligence platform or S&P Capital IQ.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

Thank you for your interest in S&P Global Market Intelligence! We noticed you've identified yourself as a student. Through existing partnerships with academic institutions around the globe, it's likely you already have access to our resources. Please contact your professors, library, or administrative staff to receive your student login.

At this time we are unable to offer free trials or product demonstrations directly to students. If you discover that our solutions are not available to you, we encourage you to advocate at your university for a best-in-class learning experience that will help you long after you've completed your degree. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

In This List

Del. Supreme Court reverses ruling on stockholder suit in ETP/Regency merger

Q2: U.S. Solar and Wind Power by the Numbers

Essential Energy Insights - September 17, 2020

Essential Energy Insights September 2020

Rate case activity slips, COVID-19 proceedings remain at the forefront in August


Del. Supreme Court reverses ruling on stockholder suit in ETP/Regency merger

Limited unit holders in Regency Energy Partners LP deserve to have their conflict-of-interest case following the partnership's acquisition by Energy Transfer Partners LP reheard, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled Jan. 20.

The court overruled a Chancery Court decision that held that Regency's general partner informed limited partners properly about the impact of the 2015 takeover offer by ETE. The court noted that several members of the conflicts committees for the buyer, ETE, and seller, Regency, were the same people.

"The Court of Chancery was correct that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing cannot be used to supplant the express disclosure requirements of the partnership agreement," the Delaware Supreme Court said in its opinion. "But the court focused too narrowly on the partnership agreement's disclosure requirements. Instead, the center of attention should have been on the conflict resolution provision of the partnership agreement."

The decision has no impact on the already completed merger. Spokesmen for ETE were not immediately available for comment.

The Delaware Supreme Court ruled that limited partners had a direct interest in the makeup of the conflicts committee and that interest should be heard by the courts. "The partnership agreement's conflict resolution provision is a powerful tool in the general partner's hands because it can be used to shield a conflicted transaction from judicial review," the judges wrote. "But the conflicts resolution provision also operates for the unitholders' benefit. It ensures that, before a safe harbor is reached by the general partner, unaffiliated unitholders have a vote, or the conflicted transaction is reviewed and recommended by an independent Conflicts Committee."

The case heads back to the Chancery Court.