trending Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/0fmfnzhr4bw32y3iwpk7dg2 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *

* Required

In this list

HHS asks Colorado's health exchange to return $9.7M of federal funds

Street Talk Episode 52 - A bank's 'knife fight' to stay high performing in a low rate environment

Streaming Media Devices Feel The Squeeze In Q3'19

AT&T To Use Wireless Subs To Create Buzz For HBO

Municipal CUSIP Requests On Pace For Record Year, Thanks To October Issuance Surge

HHS asks Colorado's health exchange to return $9.7M of federal funds

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services asked the Colorado marketplace to refund about $9.7 million of establishment grant funds to the federal government, saying the funds were not spent in accordance with the federal requirements.

The department said the state was granted $183.7 million for the establishment of a health insurance marketplace under President Barack Obama's healthcare law. The marketplace improperly charged $4.5 million for hardware and software operational support and maintenance contracts, contrary to the guidelines of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services that prohibit such use of the funds.

In response to the department's inquiry, Connect for Health Colorado said it "identified the prepaid support and maintenance costs benefitting the period subsequent to December 31, 2014, and credited the amounts back against future payment requests of federal funds." The Colorado marketplace also disagreed with the department's findings that about $4.4 million in costs charged to the establishment grants were not adequately documented.

Colorado's exchange agreed with the auditor's recommendation for procedural changes but disagreed with the recommendation that it refund $9.7 million.