latest-news-headlines Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/pandemic-planning-versus-panicking-8211-september-s-shipping-surge-60690237 content esgSubNav
In This List

Pandemic planning versus panicking – September's shipping surge

Blog

Global M&A By the Numbers: Q3 2021

Blog

Capital Markets Activity Infographic: SPAC Volume Rises in Q3; Equity Issuance Drops but Remains Strong in Several Sectors

Blog

Insight Weekly: Global stock performance; hydrogen pilot projects; Powell's Fed future unsure

Case Study

Honing Sustainable Investing Strategies with Robust Environmental Data


Pandemic planning versus panicking – September's shipping surge

The recovery in trade activity in the wake of COVID-19's closures of the industrial and retail economy continued apace in September. Panjiva's U.S. seaborne import data shows that total shipments climbed 14.8% year over year in September, following a 13.1% improvement in August. Imports of containerized freight similarly increased 11.1% in September after an 6.0% rise a month earlier.

There is also some evidence of the peak shipping season being pulled forward, with containerized freight imports having increased 0.1% sequentially when normally — based on the past 10 years — shipments in September are 4.9% lower than in August. Whether that is due to expectations of an earlier peak-shopping season or conservatism against the risk of a resurgence in the pandemic is not immediately apparent.

As has been the case in prior months, it was shipments from China that led the way, with a 17.7% year-over-year surge marking an acceleration from a 14.4% rise the month before. Aside from the earlier economic recovery, that may reflect shippers wanting to get ahead of the risk of a post-Golden Week resurgence in the pandemic. Additionally, with tariffs now over two years old, as discussed in Panjiva's Oct. 8 report, it is likely that many supply chains have either adapted or factored them into costs.

Shipments from Asia ex-China accelerated to a 13.5% increase compared to 4.2% a month earlier. A continued downturn in exports from Japan and South Korea — both dominated by the troubled automotive sector — was offset by a 31.3% jump in shipments from Vietnam. A widely trailed, and not implemented, section 301 review of Vietnamese exports may have triggered a similar pre-tariff rush to that seen in shipments from China two years ago.

SNL Image

Only one of the Global Industry Classification Standard sectors analyzed, energy, suffered a year-over-year decline in September, while only seven of the 27 sub-industries covered experienced a drop, indicating the widespread nature of the recovery in both the industrial and consumer segments of the economy.

Unsurprisingly, given the continued presence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the fastest rate of growth was seen in the healthcare and consumer staples, which includes home and personal care, sectors with increases of 49.2% and 29.1% being similar to a month earlier.

Shipments in the consumer discretionary sector climbed 21.6%, marking an acceleration from August's 16.4% increase and providing some credence to the hypothesis that retailers are seeking to get ahead of an earlier shopping season and the risk of further store closures.

Industrial imports also climbed 13.7% higher led by a continued surge in agricultural machinery imports as well as a recovery in industrial machinery. The latter is an encouraging sign of improved business confidence.

At the commodity end of the economy, imports of materials increased by a more modest 6.4%, though shipments of metals jumped 10.0% higher, confirming that the basis effect of tariffs has likely passed. Energy was the only industry to see a downturn, perhaps reflecting continued reduced demand from the transportation sector as well as earlier storm interruptions to supplies into the Gulf Coast.

Christopher Rogers is a senior researcher at Panjiva, which is a business line of S&P Global Market Intelligence, a division of S&P Global Inc. This content does not constitute investment advice, and the views and opinions expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of S&P Global Market Intelligence. Links are current at the time of publication. S&P Global Market Intelligence is not responsible if those links are unavailable later.