latest-news-headlines Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/in-america-black-families-pay-more-for-energy-than-white-families-8211-study-59180525 content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

If your company has a current subscription with S&P Global Market Intelligence, you can register as a new user for access to the platform(s) covered by your license at Market Intelligence platform or S&P Capital IQ.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

Thank you for your interest in S&P Global Market Intelligence! We noticed you've identified yourself as a student. Through existing partnerships with academic institutions around the globe, it's likely you already have access to our resources. Please contact your professors, library, or administrative staff to receive your student login.

At this time we are unable to offer free trials or product demonstrations directly to students. If you discover that our solutions are not available to you, we encourage you to advocate at your university for a best-in-class learning experience that will help you long after you've completed your degree. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

In This List

In America, Black families pay more for energy than white families, says study

Q2: U.S. Solar and Wind Power by the Numbers

Essential Energy Insights - September 17, 2020

Essential Energy Insights September 2020

Rate case activity slips, COVID-19 proceedings remain at the forefront in August

In America, Black families pay more for energy than white families, says study

Black households in the U.S., particularly those considered to be "low-income," pay "significantly" more to satisfy their energy needs than white households, according to a new working paper released by the University of California, Berkeley, Energy Institute at Haas.

The "disproportionate costs," the June 21 paper posited, result in a Black household energy burden that perpetuates wealth and housing disparities.

Residential electricity, natural gas and other home-heating fuel expenditures were found to be "statistically and economically significantly higher for Black households than for white households." Examining American Community Survey data from 2010 to 2017, study author Eva Lyubich found that Black renters pay $273 more each year than their white peers, after controlling for certain factors such as income and household size.

Similarly, Black homeowners annually pay $408 more for energy than white homeowners, according to the study, which also noted that "the gap is largest for low-income households."

The degree to which housing is energy-efficient may explain some of the disparity. "Conditional on income, Black households are more likely to report that their home is drafty," the paper said, citing data from the 2015 Residential Energy Consumption Survey. "They also report fewer Energy Star qualified appliances and home features, and are less likely to have received a rebate or tax credit for having upgraded an appliance."

The findings of the study, which has not been peer-reviewed, are in line with recent calls from the Natural Resources Defense Council to combat what it called racial inequities in the efficiency sector.

"Energy efficiency programs — such as installing insulation or efficient appliances — can ... help alleviate some of the pervasive challenges faced by low-income people and communities of color" by saving their households money, cutting down on pollution, improving health and fighting the "climate crisis," Natural Resources Defense Council Energy Efficiency Director Lara Ettenson wrote in a June 24 blog post.

Lyubich, a UC Berkeley Ph.D. candidate in economics, tweeted that while her study is a "work in progress" and she hopes "to get better data and say more soon," the issue is something that economists "need to be talking about."

"Differential energy burden is one of many reasons Green New Deal proposals are centered on economic, environmental, and racial justice," she explained. "Our energy system does not exist in isolation from systemic racism or other inequalities ... and if we’re going to address the climate crisis, we cannot rely on policies that pretend that it does."

Lyubich acknowledged that her results are limited, as "energy expenditures are self-reported on an annual basis," and should be taken as "suggestive ... not causal." However, she said, the paper "contributes to a broad set of evidence that Black Americans bear a disproportionate burden of the current energy system, both through disproportionate pollution and ... through disproportionate costs, likely at least in part as a result of persistent disparities in wealth and housing."

The Energy Institute at Haas focuses on "a more economically and environmentally sustainable energy future" and lists an array of funders that includes a number of investor-owned and municipal utilities, such as the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Southern California Edison Co., as well as the California Public Utilities Commission, California ISO, Google LLC and foreign governmental entities.