Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Financial and Market intelligence
Fundamental & Alternative Datasets
Government & Defense
Professional Services
Banking & Capital Markets
Economy & Finance
Energy & Commodities
Technology & Innovation
Podcasts & Newsletters
Financial and Market intelligence
Fundamental & Alternative Datasets
Government & Defense
Professional Services
Banking & Capital Markets
Economy & Finance
Energy & Commodities
Technology & Innovation
Podcasts & Newsletters
Blog — 10 Oct, 2025
At first glance, performance numbers can appear definitive – but they rarely capture the full picture.
That’s exactly what we see when comparing global equity benchmarks in 2025. Based on total returns in USD, the STOXX Europe 600 Composite leads the pack year-to-date with 28.42%, narrowly ahead of MSCI Emerging Markets (28.2%) and well above both the S&P 500 (14.82%) and Russell 2000 (10.38%). The headline is straightforward: Europe has been the standout performer this year.
But look closer, and the story changes. In the most recent quarter (Q3 2025), the same index posted a return of just 3.61% – a sharp contrast to 8.12% for the S&P 500, 10.94% for MSCI EM, and 12.4% for the Russell 2000. A single quarter doesn’t erase the YTD lead, but it does raise an important question: What shifted so meaningfully in the market dynamic?
This is where deeper performance analysis becomes essential – and why tools like Portfolio Analytics matter. Beneath the surface, two key factors emerge as major contributors to the relative slowdown: currency movements and sector composition.
Through Portfolio Analytics, we can isolate and quantify the impact of FX on returns – and that’s where the first part of the story lies.
In Q1 and Q2, a strengthening euro boosted USD-based returns from European equities, particularly in Q2 where currency effects meaningfully amplified performance.
By Q3, that tailwind had faded. The euro weakened against the dollar, removing one of the performance boosters that helped lift returns in the first half. Once that layer was stripped away, the underlying equity performance looked more modest – and that reality became visible in the quarterly results.
The second driver is revealed when we break down performance by sector. STOXX Europe 600 is structurally underweight in Information Technology compared to the S&P 500 – a sector that has been a key engine of market gains in the United States.
In Q3, U.S. tech continued its strong run, contributing significantly to the S&P 500’s outperformance. Europe, by contrast, not only had less exposure to this sector but also saw softer returns from its own tech companies. The combination of lower allocation and weaker performance meant the index captured far less of the upside that powered U.S. equities.
Headline numbers tell us what happened – but rarely why. The STOXX Europe 600’s performance story this year is a perfect example of how those two questions can diverge. Its leadership YTD remains intact, but the slowdown in Q3 underscores the importance of deeper analysis.
By examining FX effects and sector contributions in Portfolio Analytics, we move beyond surface-level returns and uncover the forces shaping market outcomes. And for portfolio managers and investors, that understanding is far more valuable than any single performance figure.
Because in investing, as in most things, the truth lies not just in the result – but in the reasons behind it.