research Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/research/the-trucost-of-climate-investing-managing-climate-risks-in-equity-portfolios content
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform

 /


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

If your company has a current subscription with S&P Global Market Intelligence, you can register as a new user for access to the platform(s) covered by your license at Market Intelligence platform or S&P Capital IQ.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *
  • We generated a verification code for you

  • Enter verification Code here*

* Required

In This List

The “Trucost” of Climate Investing: Managing Climate Risks in Equity Portfolios

S&P Global Market Intelligence

Stepping Up To A Sustainable Future, Post COVID-19

The Positive Impact Scorecard

Infographic Solar Power by the Numbers The US Canada and Mexico

S&P Global Market Intelligence

Corporate Climate Reporting Gets Physical

Investment Management
The “Trucost” of Climate Investing: Managing Climate Risks in Equity Portfolios

Highlights

Nearly 45% of global investors surveyed in a 2017 investor study cited performance as a primary concern in sustainable investing.

Does sustainable investing come at a “cost”, and is the fear of investors around the performance concessions of “green” portfolios warranted? Our latest research suggests investors’ fears are misplaced.

Data from S&P Global Market Intelligence show that carbon-sensitive portfolios have similar returns and significantly better climate characteristics than portfolios constructed without carbon emission considerations.

Download The Full Report
Click here

Sustainable investing, which considers environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in portfolio selection and management, is a significant consideration for an ever-growing class of investors. Forty-two percent of investors surveyed in North America (Schroders Global Investor Study, 2017) cited performance as a primary concern in sustainable investing. The numbers were even higher in Asia (45%) and Europe (48%).

Does sustainable investing come at a “cost”, and is the fear of investors around the performance concessions of “green” portfolios warranted? Our research suggests investors’ fears are misplaced – carbon-sensitive portfolios have similar returns and significantly better climate characteristics than portfolios constructed without carbon emission considerations.

Figure 1: Value of $100 Invested in Carbon Sensitive Portfolios (July 2007 – July 2019)

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence Quantamental Research. For all exhibits, all returns and indices are unmanaged, statistical composites and their returns do not include payment of any sales charges or fees an investor would pay to purchase the securities they represent. Such costs would lower performance. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Data as at 08/31/2019.

Other findings include:

  • Highly profitable firms are likely to be leaders in reducing their carbon emission levels.
  • There is no degradation in fundamental characteristics for the carbon-sensitive portfolios compared to the baseline portfolio, even though the difference in constituents can be as high as 20%.
  • Carbon-sensitive portfolios have other desirable climate characteristics.
Learn More About Trucost
Click here

The “Trucost” of Climate Investing: Managing Climate Risks in Equity Portfolios

Click here

The Future of Alternative Data, Part 2: Trucost Environmental Data

Learn more