research Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/research/barrick-randgold-merging-to-form-gold-industry-champion content
BY CONTINUING TO USE THIS SITE, YOU ARE AGREEING TO OUR USE OF COOKIES. REVIEW OUR
PRIVACY & COOKIE NOTICE

Login to Market Intelligence Platform

New User / Forgot Password


Looking for more?

Contact Us

Request a Demo

You're one step closer to unlocking our suite of comprehensive and robust tools.

Fill out the form so we can connect you to the right person.

  • First Name*
  • Last Name*
  • Business Email *
  • Phone *
  • Company Name *
  • City *

* Required

In this list

Barrick, Randgold Merging To Form Gold Industry 'Champion'

Energy

Power Forecast Briefing: Fleet Transformation, Under-Powered Markets, and Green Energy in 2018

Trading Of US Linear TV Advertising Shifting To Programmatic Trading

Every Industry Is Now A Technology Industry

Online Video Bolstering Consumer Home Video Spend, Spearheaded By Subscription Streaming

Metals & Mining
Barrick, Randgold Merging To Form Gold Industry 'Champion'

Highlights

The New Barrick Gold Group would become, at least in the short term, the largest global gold producer by volume and by market capitalization.

The addition of Randgold's 1.2 million ounces of projected attributable production in 2018 to Barrick Gold's 4.8 Moz for the year pushes the combined entity's production above the 5.2 Moz projected for its closest peer Newmont Mining Corp.

Both companies bring to the merger what they consider "Tier one" mines, defined as having at least 500,000 oz/y of production, with total cash costs in the bottom half of the industry cost curve, over at least a 10-year mine life.

Oct. 10 2018 — Toronto-based Barrick Gold Corp.'s proposed merger with London-listed Randgold Resources Ltd. would create what the companies term "a new champion for long-term value creation in the gold industry," based on a large share of the world's "Tier One" producing mines, low total cash costs and strong management. Incidentally, the New Barrick Gold Group would become, at least in the short term, the largest global gold producer by volume and by market capitalization. The addition of Randgold's 1.2 million ounces of projected attributable production in 2018 to Barrick Gold's 4.8 Moz for the year pushes the combined entity's production above the 5.2 Moz projected for its closest peer Newmont Mining Corp.

Pending approval by both companies' shareholders, the deal is expected to close in the March 2019 quarter. The following analysis is based mostly on data compiled and analyzed separately for both companies as part of our Gold Reserves Replacement Strategies, 2008-2017 study.

When prices turned downward in 2012, Barrick acted

Once the world's largest gold producer in its own right, Barrick's attributable output of 5.3 Moz in 2017 was down 30% from 2008 and only just above that of Newmont. Output was expected to fall further in 2019, to 4.4 Moz, reflecting a strategic shift in the company's activities, away from a focus on production growth towards a prioritization of margin and an emphasis on balance sheet repair.

In 2013, in response to the declining gold price, Barrick wrote down US$13 billion of assets and placed 12 of its mines under review, which represented roughly 25% of the company's gold output at the time. Operations with all-in sustaining costs of more than US$1,000/oz — among them Bald Mountain, Round Mountain and Marigold in the United States and Plutonic in Western Australia — were put on the chopping block to improve free cash flow.

In 2015, Executive Chairman John Thornton articulated the company's strategy as one of focusing on gold, with no plans to diversify into other metals or to add to its existing copper position. Thornton outlined a plan to focus investment in the company's core regions to sustain high-quality, long-life assets in attractive jurisdictions.

Barrick's divestment and debt-reduction strategy is apparent in its M&A activity from 2015, when gold hit a six-year low annual average of US$1,160/oz, to year-end 2017, when it shed more than 14 Moz of gold in reserves through divestitures while halving its debt burden to US$6.4 billion.

Randgold did not engage in the same hunt for production growth that Barrick pursued in the late 2000s. While the company's gold output has been rising steadily over the past 10 years, tripling from 376,476 oz in 2008 to 1.1 Moz of attributable production in 2017, Randgold has consistently marketed its strategy as one of high hurdle rates, cautious reserve-price assumptions and a focus on margins. In terms of recent operating strategy, there is much that is complementary between the two companies in the proposed merger.

An enlarged portfolio of top-tier gold mines

Both companies bring to the merger what they consider "Tier one" mines, defined as having at least 500,000 oz/y of production, with total cash costs in the bottom half of the industry cost curve, over at least a 10-year mine life. Barrick has three: the Cortez and Goldstrike mines in the Barrick Nevada complex and Pueblo Viejo. Randgold has two: Loulo-Gounkoto and Kibali. The new management team is giving high priority to evaluating all assets with a focus on maximizing value on a relative few as quickly as possible and examining options for gaining value from others, including strategic partnerships and outright divestitures.

On an all-in sustaining cost basis, the five "Tier one" assets sit comfortably below or close to the median cost (US$983/oz), with a number of other producing assets also in the bottom half of the cost curve.

Concurrent with the Randgold merger announcement, Barrick reported a US$300 million mutual investment with Shandong Gold Mining Co. Ltd. The company said the investment is based on a two-pronged strategy: to have Shandong act as the vehicle for a Barrick push into China and to become a bigger partner in Latin America. Shandong's involvement could help pave the way forward for the stalled Pascua-Lama project in Argentina, looking at "an analysis of potential synergies between Lama and the nearby Veladero operation." On the company's first day of trade on the Hong Kong stock exchange, Shandong Chairman Li Guohong confirmed that negotiations centered on Pascua-Lama were under way. Barrick and Shandong formed a working group on the project when they struck a deal for nearby Veladero in 2017.

Trimming of the reserve base

Both companies currently have remaining reserves life of 11 years, based on their 2017 rate of production. Barrick's reserves base has been shrinking since 2013 — first because of a sharp cut in the reserves-calculation price in 2013, to US$1,100/oz from US$1,500/oz in 2012, and second because of the string of noncore asset divestitures averaging nearly 4 Moz of reserves annually over the past five years. Year-end reserves have fallen to 64.4 Moz of gold in 2017 from 138.5 Moz in 2008. Randgold, which has used a conservative US$1,000/oz or less in reserves calculations over the past 10 years, has been able to maintain year-end reserves between 16 Moz and 14 Moz since 2009.

Bringing more projects into production

While it holds a number of the world's largest undeveloped gold deposits, including Pascua-Lama, Alturas and Norte Abierto-Cerro Casale in Chile and Donlin in Alaska, Barrick's biggest challenge has perhaps been an inability to bring its own development projects to fruition. Randgold management's strong reputation for "developing and operating profitable gold mines in difficult environments" is seen as complementary to Barrick's "operational capabilities," according to Randgold CEO Mark Bristow, who has been named CEO of the New Barrick.

Barrick's pipeline consists mainly of expansion projects at existing mines, including Turquoise Ridge and Cortez Deep South in the USA and Lagunas Norte in Peru — all targeted to come online in 2021 or 2022. This reflects the company's conservative focus on brownfields investment. However, it has also invested in early stage exploration in the past 10 years and has shown considerable success in finding new orebodies, particularly in Latin America and Nevada. With total grassroots exploration budgets of US$804 million from 2003 to 2017, the company is credited with shares in 11 major gold discoveries, seven of which it still holds.

Although Randgold's development pipeline is currently modest, the company has successfully found and brought online four significant discoveries since the mid-1990s — all in West Africa, including Morila, Loulo and Gounkoto in Mali and Tongon in Cote d'Ivoire.

According to CEO Bristow, the company is aggressively hunting for its next big project in the African gold belts, as well as further afield, while also aiming to start developing three new projects over the next four years. Randgold's strategic threshold for all projects is a 20% internal rate of return at a US$1,000/oz gold price; new stand-alone deposits must, however, have a minimum size of 3 Moz of gold.

Randgold's flagship Loulo-Gounkoto gold mining complex in Mali, already one of the largest of its kind in the world, is still expanding, with the Gounkoto super pit and the new Baboto satellite pit joining its Yalea and Gara underground mines. Development of the Gounkoto super pit will extend the mine life by five years and make a significant contribution to the Loulo-Gounkoto complex's 10-year plan, which envisions production in excess of 600,000 oz/y at a gold price of US$1,000/oz.

In Senegal, the feasibility study for Randgold's Massawa gold project is nearing completion, with a development decision scheduled for the end of this year. According to Joel Holliday, Randgold's general manager of exploration, "continuing exploration is focused on expanding the Massawa reserve, and while it is still short of Randgold's 3 million ounce minimum requirement, the project's other metrics are positive."

Massawa was discovered by Randgold in 2007 and is one of the larger undeveloped gold deposits in West Africa. Its relatively long gestation period is a reflection of the company's tenacity and thorough approach to exploration, and a further example of its discipline in bringing projects to account.

Further refinement

The similarity in the two companies' currently projected production life suggests a merger that is focused primarily on maximizing the value of existing mines and projects, rather than on adding production. While the Randgold merger is at the forefront of Barrick's near-term plans, the company has clearly maintained its focus on core and 'strategic' assets, low production costs, preserving margins and value creation for shareholders. A forthcoming article will examine the potential scenarios for the evolution of the company's asset structure as this strategy takes hold.

Learn more about our global metals & mining service.

Learn more about Market Intelligence
Request Demo

Webinar Replay: State Of The Market - Mining Q2-2018

Learn More

Watch: Power Forecast Briefing: Fleet Transformation, Under-Powered Markets, and Green Energy in 2018

Steve Piper shares Power Forecast insights and a recap of recent events in the US power markets in Q4 of 2017. Watch our video for power generation trends and forecasts for utilities in 2018.


Technology, Media & Telecom
Trading Of US Linear TV Advertising Shifting To Programmatic Trading

Oct. 08 2018 — Both buyers and sellers of traditional linear TV advertising, not including connected TV or over-the-top video, are moving toward the adoption of programmatic trading. In 2017, Kagan estimates that $690 million or 0.9% of total linear TV spend was traded programmatically. Within the next five years, that figure is expected to climb to $9.76 billion or nearly 12% of total linear TV advertising revenue. MVPDs are forecast to trade the greatest percentage of their ad inventory programmatically in 2022 with 30% of ad revenue from programmatic trading.

Kagan defines programmatic trading as being automated and data-enhanced, not just one or the other. Trading may be through a private or open marketplace and does not have to be through an auction, which is more common in digital video advertising.

There are several issues holding participants back from programmatic trading. Unlike digital programmatic marketplaces, where there is a seemingly unending supply of ad inventory, linear TV has a finite supply. Demand for TV inventory exceeds the supply, so there is still an attitude of "If it isn't broken, don't fix it." TV ads are also bought well in advance, not immediately.

While many agencies have experimented with the programmatic trading of linear TV, not all are on board. Many of the advertisers and agencies are interacting directly with the supplier platform rather than going through a demand-side platform, or DSP, today. In their experiments, the agency needs to use separate platforms to aggregate inventory and tie it together, which is a lot of work.

The lack of inventory is one factor holding back programmatic trading. The only way it takes off is to make linear TV inventory available in some type of buyer platform that can combine the various supply platforms. It is even more complicated when the buyer wants to bring in connected TV (OTT).

Agencies do like the automation capabilities of programmatic, particularly where the process takes a lot of time. An algorithm may do better in areas such as weighting estimation, the first pass at scheduling and the negotiation process as well as postings and billings. The process of buying inventory is not difficult, but computing where a buyer will be able to find its preferred audience is. Therefore, interest in automating the planning and analysis to find an optimal audience is high.

We forecast a gradual uptake for programmatic trading with continued testing in 2018. Broadcast stations and networks, cable programmers, and MVPDs need to add more inventory to programmatic platforms before agencies begin using it in earnest. It will take time for all parties to feel comfortable transacting in a new way.

Learn more about Market Intelligence
Request Demo

Technology
Every Industry Is Now A Technology Industry

Highlights

And every company is now a technology company.

Sep. 28 2018 — As machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI), and robotics become commonplace and enter the operations of mainstream organizations, leadership teams are finding that failure to harness and leverage AI puts them behind the competition. Repeatable tasks are carried out by bots in a fraction of the time and employees are more focused on adding value, which means companies on the forefront of technology can be more reliable, more user-friendly, and faster to market.

In this highly disruptive environment, one traditional truth of business has withstood, or has perhaps even guided, these technological advances: above all, the customer experience is king. More than ever before, businesses have effective technologies at their fingertips to quickly and effectively address customer pain points, while at the same time dramatically improving their internal operations.

At S&P Global Market Intelligence, we strive to get beyond the buzzwords and truly deliver essential insight. And second to this, we strive to adopt real operational efficiencies into our delivery that are paralleled by the workflow efficiencies we promise to our customers. To that end, we are committed to remaining on the cutting edge of emerging technologies, first through optimization, then automation.

Download a recent analysis of how we’re applying new technology like natural language processing to structure data, robotic process automation to deliver insights faster, and predictive analytics to stay ahead of the market.

You can also view this analysis in Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, and Japanese.

Learn more about Market Intelligence
Request Demo

Natural Language Processing – Part II: Stock Selection

Learn More

Natural Language Processing, Part I: Primer

Learn More

Technology, Media & Telecom
Online Video Bolstering Consumer Home Video Spend, Spearheaded By Subscription Streaming

Highlights

The following post comes from Kagan, a research group within S&P Global Market Intelligence.

To learn more about our TMT (Technology, Media & Telecommunications) products and/or research, please request a demo.

Sep. 20 2018 — Spending on home entertainment is rising toward levels not seen since 2004, when consumers spent $24.37 billion building massive home-video libraries of DVDs and VHS cassettes. Since then, the optical-disc market saw more than a decade of significant declines as consumers shifted to digital entertainment. By 2012, total spending on home entertainment was down to $20.13 billion, with $4.13 billion coming from online video while DVDs and Blu-ray discs accounted for $12.88 billion and multichannel PPV/VOD contributed the remaining $3.13 billion.

Fast forward to 2017 and the mix of consumer spending has changed significantly. Consumers spent a total of $22.62 billion on home entertainment from multichannel, online and disc retail/rental sources. Online spending accounted for $13.00 billion of that total while spending on discs dropped to $6.84 billion and multichannel PPV/VOD shrank to $2.79 billion.

While the data might seem like good news for traditional providers of home entertainment, a key component of the growth in digital spending is the rise of subscription video on demand. The majority of online spending is going to over-the-top services like Netflix, Hulu and Amazon Prime, which increasingly have focused on creating original programming (mainly episodic TV) rather than licensing content from Hollywood studios.

Removing subscription streaming from the consumer spending pool paints a less favorable picture for traditional content providers. In 2012, consumers spent just $1.43 billion on non-subscription online video purchase/rental, and a total of $17.44 billion excluding the SVOD component. By 2017, while consumer spending on online video overall had risen to $13.00 billion, some $10.47 of that came from streaming subscriptions versus $2.53 billion from online video purchase/rental, and total home-entertainment spending was just $12.16 billion excluding SVOD.

Spending on sell-through home video peaked in 2006 when consumers shelled out $16.53 billion for DVDs and VHS cassettes. Since then spending has declined by hundreds of millions (sometimes billions) each year. In 2017, consumers spent $6.50 billion on DVD and Blu-ray sell-through and electronic sell-through. This seems to suggest that people are becoming less and less interested in adding to their home-video libraries and are turning to the more affordable streaming options. The story is similar for the home-video rental segment, which saw consumer spending peak in 2001 at nearly $8.45 billion before dropping to $2.87 billion by the end of 2017.

This has to be a somewhat unsettling trend for the major film studios, and is likely a key factor in shifting their strategy to focus on major franchise films and low-cost genre fare. The former tend to have broad worldwide appeal and can still move enough video units to help offset their high production and distribution costs. The low-cost genre fare, on the other hand, may be more risky and not sell as well internationally, but has a fair chance to break even. If the latter films lose money, the successful franchise films typically cover the losses.

Learn more about Market Intelligence
Request Demo

US Online Video Outlook To Eclipse $15B In 2018

Learn More

DVD, Blu-ray Spending Down $1B-plus For 11th Year In A Row

Learn More