blog Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/blog/gold-rrs-2020-top-gold-producers-reserves-in-decline content esgSubNav

In This List

Gold RRS 2020 — Top Gold Producers' Reserves In Decline


FIMA EUROPE 2023: Exploring the Intersection of Data, Governance, and Future Trends in Finance


Infographic: The Big Picture 2024 – Supply Chains Outlook


Infographic: The Big Picture 2024 – Energy Transition Outlook


Infographic: The Big Picture 2024 – Capital Markets Outlook

Gold RRS 2020 — Top Gold Producers' Reserves In Decline

Hampered by a lack of new discoveries and a shift away from growth-focused strategies toward margin preservation, the world's major gold miners have seen their economically minable gold reserves decline over the past 10 years. With top producers facing declining production profiles, shrinking reserves and rising production costs, we expect many to supplement their depleted pipelines by expanding organic exploration in the near term while leveraging targeted acquisitions.

Sixteen of the world's 20 largest gold miners — including top producers Newmont Corp., Barrick Gold Corp., AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. and Kinross Gold Corp. — saw their aggregate remaining years of production fall over the 2010-19 period. At the end of 2019, Kinross had just nine years remaining, down dramatically from 24 years at the start of the period.

Only two companies — Zijin Mining Group Co. Ltd. and Fresnillo PLC — had more remaining years of production at the end of the 2010-19 period than at the start, and Gold Fields Ltd.'s remaining years were unchanged at 20. (We excluded Sibanye-Stillwater Ltd. from the chart above as the company was not created until 2013; during its seven years of operation, however, its remaining reserves life increased from 12 to 15 years.) Overall, the remaining years of production for the group, excluding Sibanye, fell by six years over the past decade, to 14 from 20.

Throughout the 10-year period, some miners relied mainly on acquisitions to replenish reserves or bolster production, although some of their largest deals are now viewed as overpriced, ill-timed or having not "panned out" as envisioned.

Major producers replaced gold reserves for US$175 per ounce

Over the 10-year period, the 20 top producers spent a total of US$69.55 billion on acquisitions and exploration, representing an average cost of US$175.15 per ounce for the 397 million ounces of replaced reserves.

Almost three-quarters, or US$51.38 billion, of the group's total expenditure went to acquisitions and accounted for 53% of the group's reserves growth; 26% of spending, or US$18.17 billion, went to exploration and accounted for 47% of reserves growth.

As reserves added through acquisition are initially much more expensive than reserves added through exploration, companies that emphasize acquisitions tend to have higher average costs for adding reserves than companies more focused on exploration. Some of the reserves growth credited to exploration was, however, derived from upgrading resources and increasing reserves at acquired projects.

Since 2010, 16 of the profiled gold producers have managed to increase their annual production, with Kirkland Lake Gold posting the largest increase. The Toronto-based company boosted output by more than 2,000%, from just 45,000 ounces in 2010 to almost 975,000 ounces in 2019.

In the full report, available to clients, we analyze each producer’s efforts, and the entire group’s production changes, reserves acquisitions and divestitures, exploration budgets and discoveries, providing comprehensive reserves-replacement metrics.

Learn more about Market Intelligence
Request Demo