Article Summary

The US has increased tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50%, impacting vehicle production and costs. At the same time, court challenges could impact some tariffs enforcement. Read the latest updates to understand the current auto tariffs landscape. 

Highlights

  • US has increased Section 232 tariff on steel and aluminum to 50%.
  • Calculation for derivative articles has been updated.
  • International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs challenged by court; applicable during White House appeal process.
  • S&P Global Mobility June 2025 forecast includes assumptions surrounding latest auto tariffs activity.

 

Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs now 50%

Recent US government actions have further complicated the auto tariffs landscape. Effective June 4, 2025, the US increased its tariff on imported steel and aluminum from 25% to 50%, including for derivative articles (this covers parts and components which contain steel and aluminum, versus finished products ready for sale to a consumer).

This tariff applies to imports from all countries except the UK, to allow the US and the UK to finalize a trade agreement framework announced in May. The two countries may develop a quota-based structure; but if talks aren’t resolved, the UK also moves from 25% to 50%.

In addition to increasing the tariff amount, US President Donald Trump changed how the tariffs apply to derivative steel and aluminum articles. As of June 4, non-aluminum, non-steel content of all aluminum and steel articles and derivative articles are subject to the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2. Those tariffs are under the International Emergency Economic Protection Act (IEEPA); through July 8, they sit at 10% from countries except China, Canada and Mexico. As with prior tariff moves under this Administration, including the earlier 25%, no drawback is available.

The change ensures that 100% of the derivative part sees some form of tariff; previously, the derivative would only have a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum content and the rest of the parts’ value would enter the US non-tariffed. As of June 4, the metals portion sees a 50% tariff, while the non-metal value is tariffed at 10%. The solution is expected to complicate the process, and to result in a higher overall auto tariff than if the derivative part was subject to only the 50% tariff. 

Impact of auto tariffs on manufacturing costs

These new measures will increase the cost of most vehicles manufactured in the US, though impact will vary by vehicle as the level of imported steel and aluminum or steel and aluminum derivative parts varies with each vehicle.

S&P Global Mobility is not providing a per-vehicle estimate of the impact of increased steel and aluminum tariffs on manufacturing costs. However, in combination with the decision in May 2025 not to tariff USMCA-compliant auto parts, a lower net vehicle price increase is now expected than was presumed in April 2025 with the announcement of reciprocal auto tariffs.

US auto industry consumption of steel and aluminum is typically done through contract pricing in advance, and the industry is more reliant on non-tariffed US-sourced metals than imported metals. Still, these recent moves reflect that we have not reached stability in the trade situation.

AutoTechInsight

US Court of International Trade ruling on tariffs

On May 28, a panel of three judges on the US Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled on whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (“IEEPA”) gives the President authority to impose unlimited tariffs on goods from nearly every country in the world, in response to two separate court cases. From the court ruling: “The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder.”

However, the White House appealed the decision with speed, and a stay of the CIT ruling was issued while an appeal is being developed and heard. The tariffs issued in various executive orders and proclamations will continue to be collected for now.

The May 28 court ruling gave the White House ten days to stop collecting the IEEPA tariff. If the CIT ruling is upheld, the US may also be required to reimburse all tariffs collected under this authority after June 7. If the White House’s view is upheld, the tariffs will simply continue.

Timing for when the appeal will be heard has not been disclosed. The result is the status quo for now.

Tariffs impact on vehicle production and sales forecasts – June update

The S&P Global Mobility June 2025 light-vehicle production forecast will reflect the activities since late April through to the increased steel and aluminum Section 232 tariff on June 4, 2025. The late April/early May activity put the auto industry in a somewhat better position than anticipated, though the June 4 metals tariff increase offsets some of the easing.​

While the June automotive industry forecast is still in development, we have provisionally determined that global production is being revised upwards in the range of 750,000 units for 2025 and by a similar level in 2026.​ North American production is being revised upwards in the range of 300,000 for 2025 and 250,000 in 2026​.

This outlook, while still grim, is better than it was with the April 2025 forecast. The situation does remain difficult for determining investment and sourcing decisions, as changes and challenges continue.

On the issue of US and North American production, the sharp curtailing of output–which we initially expected—has not come to fruition yet. Automakers have made some minor sourcing change announcements, most of which will not come into play before late 2026 or 2027, while they have largely adopted a ‘wait-and-see’ approach relative to adjusting North American production as immediate reaction.

The potential supply chain disruption from Chinese export restrictions of rare earth materials is not a factor in this forecast round. There is insufficient information to predict which automakers will be affected, when they will be affected, or how they will manage the disruption within their global production footprint.

Tariffs impact on vehicle inventory and car prices

We expect inventory in the US could decline from about 2.7 million units to around 2.0 million units by December. Stronger-than-expected US auto sales from January through May are likely the result of consumer pre-buying with a payback.

May sales growth softened, but the impact of tariffs on car prices is yet to be realized; so far, vehicle prices have not been significantly adjusted upwards. OEMs appear to be in a holding pattern on prices in the hope of auto tariff relief from pending negotiations; price increases confirmed to date have focused on routine model-year pricing updates and adjustments based on vehicle content, not auto tariffs.

Future expectations for auto tariffs

Though the steel and aluminum tariffs have been raised, we see the broader picture from the latest activity reinforcing our expectation that lower-than-25% auto tariffs will occur over time. Even so, it remains a high-tariff situation and making significant sourcing changes is difficult, expensive and time-consuming.

Though there has been no further announced activity, we expect the UK quota-based template will likely be used with other non-USMCA agreements.​ A quota-based structure may also be applied to the steel and aluminum tariffs, based on comments surrounding the UK.

With a quota-based structure, we would expect notable differences in quota level and tariff amounts among countries.​ It is not clear if quotas will decrease progressively over time or be set statically for the foreseeable future.​

S&P Global Mobility offers clients unique insights to navigate tariffs and more, allowing you to see opportunities others don’t. With 100+ years of automotive industry expertise, we offer tailored, ongoing advisory services designed to help you navigate tariffs and win. 

This article was published by S&P Global Mobility and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global.


Content Type

 

Articles