IN THIS LIST

The S&P GSCI: Built for the Cycle

Licensed Truth: Official Index Data as the Missing Layer in DeFi Market Integrity

The S&P 500® and Trump Accounts

TalkingPoints: Delivering Deeper Insights into Private Markets

TalkingPoints: Measuring Global Equity Beta with the S&P TIP Global AllCap Index

The S&P GSCI: Built for the Cycle

Contributor Image
Nicholas Godec

Senior Director, Head of Fixed Income Tradables & Commodities

S&P Dow Jones Indices

Over the 10-year period from May 29, 2016, to May 29, 2026, the S&P GSCI TR had a gain of 126.3%, outperforming the 100.6% gain for the Bloomberg Commodity Index (BCOM) TR.  The 26-percentage-point spread translates to roughly 130 bps of annualized outperformance. More important than the outperformance itself is the underlying reason: how each index responds to inflation.

Regressing year-over-year total return on year-over-year headline CPI yields an inflation beta of 9.09 for the S&P GSCI and 5.50 for BCOM (R² of 51.8% and 42.2%, respectively, on 109 monthly observations).  The S&P GSCI's slope is roughly 1.7× steeper.  In the upper tercile of the inflation distribution, where headline CPI averaged 5.8% year-over-year, the S&P GSCI gained an average of 33.4% on a trailing 12-month basis versus 21.1% for BCOM.  The 12.3-percentage-point gap appears precisely when an inflation hedge could be considered most relevant.

Production weighting drives the result.  The S&P GSCI weights its constituents by a five-year rolling average of world production, which causes index weights to scale with each commodity's economic footprint.  Target January 2026 rebalancing weights for Energy were 51.8% for the S&P GSCI and 29.4% in BCOM.  Energy is also the largest single contributor to the variance of headline inflation.  The two facts compound: an index that holds more energy moves more when energy moves, and energy often moves with the inflation cycle.

Higher beta cuts both ways.  The same construction that showed a 33.4% trailing gain in high inflation regimes lost 9.7% in low inflation regimes, while BCOM averaged -4.4% in low inflation regimes.  The pattern across the decade is consistent: the S&P GSCI led when inflation was elevated and lagged when it was not.  That said, as we’ll see later, the S&P GSCI’s outperformance during high inflation regimes far exceeded relative underperformance during low inflation regimes.  As such, the S&P GSCI has historically exhibited characteristics associated with inflation hedging.

The Decade in Numbers

We compare the S&P GSCI and BCOM performance in total return terms for the 10-year period ending May 29, 2026, which was the most recent month-end when this study was performed.  Over the course of the past decade, we’ve encountered periods of especially low inflation, such as 2020 with the COVID-19 slowdown, or high inflation, like 2021–2022 with the post-2020 inflation rebound and the start of the Ukraine-Russia conflict in 2021, and periods in between.  Over the full cycle, the S&P GSCI meaningfully outperformed BCOM; however, relative performance varied within the period based on the type of inflationary regime.

pdf-icon PD F Download Full Article


Processing ...