research Market Intelligence /marketintelligence/en/news-insights/research/columbia-gas-withdraws-green-path-proposal-as-part-of-md-rate-case-settlement content esgSubNav
In This List

Columbia Gas withdraws Green Path proposal as part of Md. rate case settlement


Insight Weekly: Unease roils markets; US likely to slip into recession; firms' cash ratios fall


Insight Weekly: Bank boards lag on gender parity; future of office in doubt; US LNG exports leap


Insight Weekly: Job growth faces hurdles; shale firms sit on cash pile; Africa's lithium future


Insight Weekly: Loan growth picks up; US-China PE deals fall; France faces winter energy crunch

Columbia Gas withdraws Green Path proposal as part of Md. rate case settlement


The parties to Columbia Gas of Maryland Inc.'s pending gas distribution base rate proceeding in Case No. 9680 reached a settlement Sept. 2 calling for the company to implement a $4.8 million gas distribution base rate increase effective Dec. 17, 2022.

If approved by the Maryland Public Service Commission, the company, or CGM, would be authorized a 9.65% return on equity (52.79% of capital) and a 7.11% overall return. As part of the settlement, CGM agreed to withdraw, without prejudice, its Green Path renewable natural gas pilot.

SNL Image

* The stipulated rate change is more than half that initially sought by CGM and is greater than the rate increases supported by the intervening parties.

* The agreed upon ROE, while significantly below that sought by CGM, is the same as that approved in CGM's prior case and is above current prevailing rate case averages. The ROEs recommended by the intervening parties were also significantly below that sought by CGM, and the lower ROEs accounted for the majority of the revenue requirement differences between the respective parties and the company.

* While the agreement does not specify the authorized rate base, it does lay out a process for addressing post-test-year capital additions in future proceedings.

* The company may refile its Green Path RNG pilot program in a separate stand-alone proceeding.

SNL Image

Next steps

The public utility law judge assigned to the case is to issue a proposed order by Oct. 28. Parties may file objections to the proposed order, but if no objections are received by Nov. 10 and the PSC does not indicate that it plans to make changes, the proposed order will become an order of the commission. If objections are filed, replies to the objections will be due by Nov. 18. The end of the suspension period is Dec. 9, and a PSC order must be issued by that date.

SNL Image

Procedural background

This proceeding was initiated May 13 when CGM filed for a $7.1 million, or 11.5%, rate increase. The NiSource Inc. subsidiary requested a 10.95% return on equity (52.77% of capital) and a 7.78% return on an average rate base valued at $204.1 million for a test year ended May 31.

On July 1, CGM filed updated testimony supporting a $6.7 million, or 10.73%, rate increase premised upon a 10.95% return on equity (52.97% of capital) and a 7.79% return on a $203.1 million rate base.

The requested base rate increase included $1.2 million of revenue and $10.8 million of rate base reflected in CGM's rider related to the Strategic Infrastructure Development and Enhancement, or STRIDE, program. If the PSC approves the supported rates as filed, the rider would be reset to zero, and customers would experience a net overall rate increase of $5.5 million.

CGM proposed a five-year RNG tariff pilot program known as the Green Path Rider. The Green Path Rider would be a fee-based, opt-in pilot rider to allow customers an option to reduce some or all of their emissions related to their natural gas usage. To do this, CGM would purchase RNG, environmental attributes and carbon offsets to reduce the participating customers' emissions associated with their natural gas usage. This would be done to match each participating customer's election of either a 100% reduction or a 50% reduction in emissions. Customers opting in to the Green Path Rider would be charged an additional fee per therm, reflecting the cost of the RNG environmental attributes and carbon offsets. The program would be offered to all residential and general service customers that are not in arrears.

The rider rate would comprise the negotiated price of renewable natural gas environmental attributes and carbon offsets procured from a third-party supplier. CGM has negotiated a fixed price for the renewable natural gas attributes and carbon offsets, and this fixed price would be passed through to the customers electing the rider on a dollar-for-dollar basis. The rider would be updated annually to reflect any changes in the cost of the attributes and offsets procured.

The PSC staff and the state Office of People's Counsel, or OPC, filed testimony July 27. The staff recommended a $3.9 million rate increase, and the OPC proposed a $2.4 million rate increase.

The $3.9 million increase recommended by the staff was premised upon a 9.75% return on equity (52.97% of capital) and a 7.16% return on a rate base valued at $198.3 million. The staff's reliance on a lower rate of return than that supported by CGM accounts for about $1.8 million of the $2.9 million shortfall relative to the $6.7 million rate increase sought by the company. Staff-proposed adjustments to the company-proposed rate base and net operating income each accounted for about half of the remaining $1.1 million difference.

The $2.4 million increase recommended by the OPC reflects an 8.75% return on equity (50% of a hypothetical capital structure) and a 6.496% return on a $203 million rate base. The OPC's reliance on a lower rate of return than that supported by CGM accounted for about $3.7 million of the $4.3 million shortfall relative to the $6.7 million rate increase sought by the company. OPC-proposed adjustments to rate base account for most of the remaining difference.

The staff and OPC both opposed the company's RNG pilot proposal. With regard to the RNG pilot, the intervening parties said the company had failed to demonstrate that the pilot met the criteria established by the PSC for such programs, the charges proposed under the tariff warranted further investigation, any costs associated with the program should be borne by program participants rather than socialized to all customers, and cost recovery procedures for such programs should be addressed generically and not as part of one utility's base rate case.

Settlement provisions

In calling for a $4.8 million, or 7.7%, rate increase, the settlement states that CGM would be authorized a 9.65% return on equity (52.97% of capital) and a 7.11% overall return. This return would be used to calculate the revenue requirement for future updates under the company's STRIDE program rider and in any "make whole" proceedings filed by the company prior to its next base rate case.

The stipulated equity return is the same as that approved in CGM's prior base rate case and is above the average of recent ROEs approved for energy utilities nationwide. According to data gathered by Regulatory Research Associates, the average ROE approved for gas utilities nationwide in cases decided during the first half of 2022 was 9.33%, and the average for the 12 months ended June 30 was 9.48%. These averages represent a notable decrease versus results observed in calendar 2021; the average ROE approved for gas utilities in rate cases decided during the calendar year was 9.56%, up from 9.47% in 2020.

For additional information concerning trends in authorized ROEs and other rate case-related statistics, refer to RRA's most recent Major Rate Case Decisions Quarterly Update.

In addition, in any make-whole proceeding or STRIDE proceeding filed prior to its next base rate case, CGM would base such filing on a fully historical test year and 13-month average rate base, with year-end values for safety and reliability-related plant additions and up to two months of post-test year investments. The company would be permitted to initially present the application with up to three months of estimated data but would be required to update the application with actual data before the parties file their respective testimony.

With regard to the treatment of post-test-year investments in future cases, the agreement states that in any future rate case that considers the inclusion of post-test year plant safety and reliability investments, CGM must include the following in its application: forecast investments by project/work order, including the precise purpose of each investment; final actual test-year amounts for the investment by project/work order; and an explanation of and rationale for any variation between actual and forecast amounts.

CGM agreed to withdraw its Green Path rider; however, the agreement states: "Such withdrawal will not limit the company from proposing a Green Path Rider or similar program in a separate proceeding." In addition, Columbia must notify the staff and OPC prior to accepting RNG onto its system and must jointly develop with staff a proposal for an RNG gas quality standard.

Regulatory Research Associates is a group within S&P Global Commodity Insights.

Joe Felizadio contributed to this article.

This article was published by S&P Global Market Intelligence and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global.

Gain access to our full news & research coverage and the industry-specific data that informs our insights.
Request Demo