IN THIS LIST

SPIVA® Asia Ex-Japan Mid-Year 2025

SPIVA® Australia Mid-Year 2025

SPIVA® U.S. Mid-Year 2025

SPIVA® Institutional Scorecard Year-End 2024

Latin America Persistence Scorecard Year-End 2024

SPIVA® Asia Ex-Japan Mid-Year 2025

Contributor Image
Sue Lee

Director, APAC Head of Index Investment Strategy

S&P Dow Jones Indices

Contributor Image
Eric Pettinelli

Fixed Income Specialist, Index Investment Strategy

S&P Dow Jones Indices

Contributor Image
Davide Di Gioia

Director, Index Investment Strategy

S&P Dow Jones Indices

Since the first publication of the S&P Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) U.S. Scorecard in 2002, S&P Dow Jones Indices has been the de facto scorekeeper of the ongoing active versus passive debate. The SPIVA Asia Ex-Japan Scorecard measures the performance of actively managed funds relative to relevant benchmarks, covering domestic equity, international equity and bond funds available in Greater China, Korea and Southeast Asia. 

Mid-Year 2025 Highlights

In the first half of 2025, many active domestic equity funds in Asia ex-Japan performed better than their relevant benchmarks, while a majority of international equity and bond funds underperformed. The rates of underperformance were generally higher for longer time horizons. Exhibit 1 summarizes the results over six-month and one-, three- and five-year periods ending in June 2025.

Exhibit 1: Active Underperformance Rates in Asia Ex-Japan

  • As the global equity market experienced varied levels of performance and dispersion in H1 2025 (see Exhibits 3 and 4), active managers in the region also exhibited a wide range of relative performance across categories. Out of 13 reported fund categories, 8 witnessed a majority (greater than 50%) of funds underperforming their assigned benchmarks (see Exhibit 2).
  • Domestic equity funds in Korea, China and Thailand excelled, with only one-quarter to one-third of active funds underperforming their respective broad-market benchmarks. Conversely, funds struggled to outperform in both the Taiwan Large-Cap and Taiwan Mid-/Small-Cap categories.
  • International equity funds demonstrated better relative performance compared to recent years. In particular, the Global Equity (KRW) and U.S. Equity (KRW) categories saw a slim majority of funds outperforming their respective benchmarks.  This may have been partially driven by currency hedging, which would have boosted the performance of some funds amid a sharp recovery of the Korean won.
  • All three bond fund categories showed majority active underperformance. Asia USD Bond funds had the highest underperformance rate (83%) against the iBoxx USD Asia ex-Japan’s solid 3.9% gain in H1 2025.
  • Fund Survivorship: The total number of active funds across our reported categories continued to trend higher, with fund liquidation remaining below 1% in H1 (see Report 2). 

Exhibit 2: Percentage of Active Funds Underperforming Benchmarks in H1 2025

pdf-icon PD F Download Full Article


Processing ...