Global Insight Perspective | |
Significance | Yesterday, the European Court of Justice ruled illegal the "Volkswagen Law" that protects the German auto manufacturer from a takeover. |
Implications | Regardless of the actual stake in the company, the VW law limits the voting rights of each shareholder to 20%, with European Commission having argued that the law goes against EU rules. |
Outlook | The ruling had been eagerly anticipated on two levels—its implications for future ownership of Europe's largest auto manufacturer, and the huge boost a decision against the law would give the European Commission's (EC) crackdown on "golden shares". |
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) yesterday ruled illegal a German law that shields Volkswagen (VW) from foreign takeovers, according to The Associated Press (AP). "The Volkswagen law limits the free movement of capital," a court press statement said. It overturned rules capping a shareholder's voting rights at 20% and requiring a majority of 80% for "important decisions." It has also rejected the right of the German federal government and the State of Lower Saxony to each appoint two members of the board as long as they are shareholders of the company. "The court declares that these questionable conditions could have a deterrent effect [on bids]," the statement said.
Outlook and Implications
The ruling had been eagerly anticipated on two levels—its implications for future ownership of Europe's largest auto manufacturer, and the huge boost a decision against the law would give the European Commission's (EC) crackdown on "golden shares". The VW law was introduced to guard against takeover when the present company was transferred to German control by the British after the Second World War. It prevents any one shareholder from exercising more than 20% of the voting rights and gives both the federal government and the State of Lower Saxony the right to two seats on VW's supervisory board. This virtually shields Europe's largest car manufacturer by sales from a takeover. The ruling on the decades-old VW law has been watched as a test case to establish the extent to which European Union (EU) governments can protect companies they see as vital to their economy. German politicians and labour unions claim the law is needed to protect local jobs. But the EC took Germany to court in 2005, saying it violates the EU's single-market principles. An adviser to the ECJ said in February that the VW Law hindered the free flow of capital in the 27-nation EU by capping voting rights and limiting board seats. The court typically backs its advisers in most cases.
Previously, VW has resisted calls for a change in the law, as has IG Metall, the powerful labour union, whose chairman, Jürgen Peters said: "The Volkswagen law has proved its value because it has contributed to the well-being of the company and its employees." When Porsche started to build a stake in VW in 2005, an understanding with the major shareholder, the State of Lower Saxony, seemed to guarantee that the company would stay in German hands. But now Porsche wants direct control. In an interview with The Sunday Times, Porsche CEO Wendelin Wiedeking said that Porsche was eagerly awaiting the court's decision on the law.
VW has become Europe's biggest carmaker after having emerged from the Second World War, with brands from the more affordable SEAT and Skoda to the upscale Audi and the stratospherically priced Lamborghini. The EC argued that the law goes against EU rules that guarantee the right to do business anywhere in the 27-nation bloc, and that "golden shares" allowing governments to protect companies have no place in the shared European market.
Anticipating the ruling will go against the VW law after the advisory opinion, fellow German automaker Porsche increased its holding in VW to 31%, while Lower Saxony raised its stake to 20.36%. That means the bloc of Porsche and Lower Saxony could stop any takeover themselves with more than 51% combined. Last month, Wiedeking said that the sports car manufacturer acquired options to raise its stake significantly in order to maintain its influence at VW (see Germany: 12 September 2007: Porsche Increases FY 2007 Sales By 3.4%; May Begin Move to Take Majority in VW—Report). Who would have imagined, when Wiedeking assumed command of the company 15 years ago and Porsche was in deep trouble, that in 2007 it would be poised to take control of a motor giant 50 times its size?
