Key Takeaways
- Hurricane Ida made landfall in southeastern Louisiana as a Category 4 hurricane, with sustained winds of about 150 mile per hour (mph), making it one of the strongest storms on record to hit the U.S. mainland.
- Early estimates of insured losses range from $15 billion to $25 billion, but it will be some time before more-definitive estimates become available.
- We think Hurricane Ida will likely be an earnings event rather than a capital event for our rated property/casualty (P/C) insurers and reinsurers.
- Any impact on re/insurance pricing will likely be limited to the affected regions.
Hurricane Ida made landfall in southeastern Louisiana on August 29, 2021, as an even more-powerful storm than Hurricane Katrina, which made landfall exactly 16 years earlier in August 2005 as a Category 3 storm with sustained winds near 125 mph. Though less-powerful, Katrina was a bigger storm with hurricane force winds bearing down on a larger area than Ida has. However, S&P Global Ratings thinks the insured losses from Ida, though substantial, appear to be well below the $41 billion of onshore privately insured losses experienced due to Katrina. A key difference is that the system of levees and pumping stations that protects the city of New Orleans and some of its suburbs, substantially upgraded following Katrina, worked as intended, thus averting the massive economic losses and humanitarian crisis caused by the flooding of the city during Katrina. Another important difference is that Ida generated a smaller storm surge and made landfall further to the west than Katrina in a less-densely populated area with a topography more resilient to storm surge.
Primary P/C Insurers Well Positioned To Absorb Losses From Ida
Wind and the consequent water damage from rain are likely to be the primary causes of damages from Ida, rather than the storm surge losses seen with Katrina. The direct premiums written by our rated P/C insurers is split roughly 60/40 between personal and commercial lines, so the most affected line will be residential property. But commercial property losses will be substantial and could be exacerbated by the widespread extended power outages across much of southeastern Louisiana, including New Orleans. We do not expect the auto insurance sector to face significant losses because mandatory evacuation orders were in effect for areas identified as in danger of flooding.
Louisiana is one of the peak wind exposure zones for many re/insurers, and many primary insurers have taken steps to reduce their property exposure in the area since Katrina. These measures include limiting the aggregate amount of risk underwritten in coastal areas and increasing use of reinsurance. The direct property premiums written by our rated insurers represent a small proportion of their total premium volumes (see table 1).
Table 1
Property Lines Exposure In Louisiana And Mississippi For Selected Rated U.S. P/C Insurers | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Insurance group | Rating/ Outlook | Total property lines direct premiums written (mil.)* | Personal property (%) | Commercial property (%) | Market share (% of industry total property llnes DPW) | Total U.S. DPW for all lines | Property lines DPW for LA and MS/total U.S. DPW (%) | Year-end 2020 capital and surplus (mil. $) | Capital and earnings assessment | |||||||||||
State Farm Mutual | AA/Stable | 867 | 93 | 7 | 16.9 | 66,153 | 1.3 | 126,077 | Excellent | |||||||||||
Allstate Corp. | AA-/Stable | 333 | 93 | 7 | 6.5 | 39,210 | 0.9 | 22,763 | Very strong | |||||||||||
Liberty Mutual | A/Stable | 259 | 74 | 26 | 5.1 | 36,173 | 0.7 | 22,768 | Strong | |||||||||||
United Services Automobile Assn. | AA+/Stable | 200 | 90 | 10 | 3.9 | 24,621 | 0.8 | 33,740 | Excellent | |||||||||||
Farmers Insurance Exchange | A/Stable | 159 | 72 | 28 | 3.1 | 23,692 | 0.7 | 8,615 | Satisfactory | |||||||||||
Nationwide Mutual | A+/Stable | 151 | 51 | 49 | 2.9 | 18,500 | 0.8 | 16,484 | Very strong | |||||||||||
The Travelers Cos. | AA/Stable | 135 | 40 | 60 | 2.6 | 28,787 | 0.5 | 21,558 | Excellent | |||||||||||
American International Group Inc. | A+/C.W. Neg | 124 | 28 | 72 | 2.4 | 13,503 | 0.9 | 18,467 | Strong | |||||||||||
Chubb Ltd. | AA/Stable | 120 | 31 | 69 | 2.4 | 24,200 | 0.5 | 17,761 | Very strong | |||||||||||
Progressive Corp. | AA/Stable | 114 | 94 | 6 | 2.2 | 42,276 | 0.3 | 15,536 | Excellent | |||||||||||
FM Global | A+/Stable | 88 | - | 100 | 1.7 | 5,134 | 1.7 | 15,359 | Excellent | |||||||||||
Assurant Inc. | A/Stable | 85 | 55 | 45 | 1.7 | 8,335 | 1.0 | 1,565 | Strong | |||||||||||
Hartford Financial Services Group Inc. | A+/Stable | 45 | 40 | 60 | 0.9 | 12,378 | 0.4 | 14,029 | Very strong | |||||||||||
CNA Financial Corp. | A+/Stable | 32 | - | 100 | 0.6 | 11,747 | 0.3 | 10,704 | Excellent | |||||||||||
W. R. Berkley Corp. | A+/Stable | 24 | 8 | 92 | 0.5 | 6,808 | 0.4 | 6,192 | Very strong | |||||||||||
The Hanover Insurance Group | A/Stable | 23 | 49 | 51 | 0.5 | 5,114 | 0.5 | 2,603 | Very strong | |||||||||||
American Family Insurance | A/Stable | 20 | 92 | 8 | 0.4 | 11,338 | 0.2 | 7,716 | Very strong | |||||||||||
Kemper Corp. | A/Stable | 20 | 19 | 81 | 0.4 | 4,521 | 0.4 | 1,873 | Very strong | |||||||||||
RLI Corp. | A/Stable | 11 | - | 100 | 0.2 | 1,107 | 1.0 | 1,122 | Strong | |||||||||||
Horace Mann Educators Corp. | A/Stable | 10 | 97 | 3 | 0.2 | 636 | 1.6 | 444 | Very strong | |||||||||||
American Financial Group Inc. | A+/Stable | 6 | 11 | 89 | 0.1 | 6,690 | 0.1 | 3,643 | Strong | |||||||||||
Old Republic International Corp. | A+/Stable | 5 | - | 100 | 0.1 | 4,778 | 0.1 | 4,034 | Excellent | |||||||||||
Selective Insurance Group Inc. | A/Stable | 2 | - | 100 | 0.0 | 3,205 | 0.1 | 2,125 | Very strong | |||||||||||
Cincinnati Financial Corp. | A+/Stable | 1 | 1 | 99 | 0.0 | 5,549 | 0.0 | 5,838 | Excellent | |||||||||||
Total | 5,118 | 62 | 38 | 100.0 | 728,942 | 0.7 | 929,272 | |||||||||||||
*Includes the following statutory lines: allied lines, commercial multiperil - nonliability, farmers multiperil, fire, homeowners multiperil, and private flood. Source: S&P Market Intelligence. |
We have examined the potential impact of Ida losses by applying a market-share approach based on a hypothetical $25 billion industry loss estimate to derive an indicative loss estimate for each insurer. While we assumed that the bulk of these losses will be retained by the primary insurers, losses passed along to their reinsurers will also be material.
Fortunately, most of the rated primary P/C insurers entered 2021 with strong capital positions (see charts 1 and 2). Based on these loss estimates, we believe the impact on capital adequacy, as measured by our proprietary capital model, would not be material enough to affect any of our ratings. Of course, this could change if an insurer ends up with regional concentrations leading to net losses significantly above this estimate.
Chart 1
Chart 2
Reinsurers Won't Remain Unscathed By Hurricane Ida
Although it is still too early to fully quantify the insured loss range from Hurricane Ida, it's clear that this is a major event for the sector. Initial insured loss estimates range from $15 billion up to $25 billion. We think global reinsurers will be significantly exposed to the damage caused by Ida, especially hitting the sector's catastrophe budget and earnings. But we expect the potential losses from this event on a stand-alone basis, will likely result in an earnings event rather than a capital event. Moreover, we view the sector as continuing to benefit from robust capitalization.
Nonetheless, losses in the first eight months of the year indicate that 2021 could potentially be another expensive natural catastrophe loss year for the reinsurance industry. The global reinsurance sector in 2017-2020 didn't earn its cost of capital due to COVID-19-related losses, large natural catastrophe losses, adverse loss trends in certain U.S. casualty lines, and fierce competition among reinsurers exacerbated by alternative capital. As a result, our sector view of the global reinsurance sector remains negative.
In the first half of 2021, the global re/insurance sector faced the second-highest natural catastrophe loss of about $40 billion versus the 10-year average of about $33 billion, according to Swiss Re. This was a result of winter storm Uri hitting Texas, as well as hail and wildfires. The second half of the year started off on a bad foot with severe floods in Europe and wildfires in the U.S., Greece, and Turkey. The German Insurance Assn. (GDV) indicated that insured industry losses for Germany for the June and July floods alone could be about $10 billion. Hurricane Ida adds to that and is the first significant Atlantic hurricane in terms of insured losses in 2021. The Atlantic hurricane season has just begun and will last until November. Predictions from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) indicate an above-average Atlantic hurricane season.
Historically, the top 21 global reinsurers have had an average market share on global insured catastrophe losses of about 20%. The market share usually increases at tail events such as Hurricane Ida and the European floods in July. Therefore, we think reinsurers will take at least that share of these losses, while market share was lower for the catastrophe losses in the first half of 2021. So, the operating performance of the sector was sound in the first half of the year benefitting from a relatively benign catastrophe environment in the second quarter of 2021. With the annual catastrophe budget and expected profit before tax of about $35 billion (see chart 3), the sector has a significant cushion before severe events hit its capital. On an aggregate basis, we think about $8 billion-$9 billion of the annual catastrophe budget for the top 21 reinsurers was used up in 2021 before Hurricane Ida. We assess that the exposure for the top 21 reinsurers in the exposed zone for 1-in-10 year to 1-in-250 year return periods lies between $2 billion and $24 billion (see table 2). However, if Hurricane Ida exceeds a 1-in-20 year loss for the affected area, the remaining annual catastrophe budget of about $4 billion-$5 billion would likely be wiped out for the sector and additional catastrophe losses would start eating into the sector's expected earnings. We believe a 1-in-20 year loss from Ida would broadly equate to a $25 billion overall insured loss for the broader industry, which appears to be the upper end of the current early loss estimate.
Capitalization has been one of the pillars of strength for the sector. Entering the 2021 North Atlantic hurricane season, global reinsurers' capital remained robust and redundant above the 'AA' confidence level by about $19.1 billion or 7% as of year-end 2020 (see chart 3).
Chart 3
While Hurricane Ida is a significant loss event for the reinsurance sector, coupled with the European floods, we expect the firming rate environment will continue in the upcoming P/C renewal season in 2022. The sector's ability to meet its cost of capital in 2021 has shrunk with Ida and will depend on the catastrophe development for the rest of the year. We will closely monitor the exposure from Ida for respective reinsurers since the catastrophe budget consumption can vary—we could take rating actions if our base-case capital and earnings assumptions are not met. But at this stage, we expect hurricane Ida to be an earnings event for the sector versus a capital event.
Table 2
Top 21 Global Reinsurers -- Catastrophe Exposure* | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
--Return periods for in-force book as of Jan. 1, 2021-- | ||||||||||||
S&P Global property catastrophe annual survey (zone 2) | 1 in 10 year | 1 in 20 year | 1 in 50 year | 1 in 100 year | 1 in 250 year | |||||||
Net aggregate probable maximum loss (bil. $) | 2.0 | 4.7 | 9.9 | 15.0 | 23.7 | |||||||
*In a few instances, when the reinsurer does not provide zonal exposure, S&P Global Ratings uses estimated figures. Zone 2: Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas; top 21 global reinsurers are: Alleghany, Arch, Ascot, Aspen, AXIS, China Re, Everest Re, Fairfax, Fidelis, Hannover Re, Hiscox, Lancashire, Lloyd’s, Markel, Munich Re, PartnerRe, Qatar Ins, RenaissanceRe, SCOR, Sirius, and Swiss Re. |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | John Iten, Princeton + 1 (212) 438 1757; john.iten@spglobal.com |
Saurabh B Khasnis, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4554; saurabh.khasnis@spglobal.com | |
Johannes Bender, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9196; johannes.bender@spglobal.com | |
Patricia A Kwan, New York + 1 (212) 438 6256; patricia.kwan@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contacts: | Charles-Marie Delpuech, London + 44 20 7176 7967; charles-marie.delpuech@spglobal.com |
Brian Suozzo, New York + 1 (212) 438 0525; brian.suozzo@spglobal.com | |
Hardeep S Manku, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2547; hardeep.manku@spglobal.com | |
Taoufik Gharib, New York + 1 (212) 438 7253; taoufik.gharib@spglobal.com | |
Research Assistants: | Prajakta S Acharekar, Mumbai |
Rachit Chauhan, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.