articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210513-china-securitization-performance-watch-1q-2021-issuance-off-to-a-strong-start-asset-performance-stable-11946160 content esgSubNav
Log in to other products


Looking for more?

In This List

China Securitization Performance Watch 1Q 2021: Issuance Off To A Strong Start, Asset Performance Stable


Default, Transition, and Recovery: Peabody Energy’s Second Selective Default Of 2021 Brings The Corporate Tally To 45


U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: April 2021 Performance


Industry Report Card: Japan Major Bank Credit Costs To Subside Slowly


The Health Care Credit Beat: U.S. Economic Recovery Doesn't Have To Follow Herd Immunity

China Securitization Performance Watch 1Q 2021: Issuance Off To A Strong Start, Asset Performance Stable

China's new securitization growth momentum has carried through into 2021. S&P Global Ratings expects the strong economic recovery to support ongoing growth in new issuance. The favorable economic conditions also underpin the steady performance of asset-backed securities (ABS) and residential-mortgage-backed securities (RMBS).

Chart 1


Yield Trend

Auto loan ABS coupons remained stable as growth of money supply leveled off
  • The Chinese government reaffirmed its goal to pursue a prudent monetary policy. Money supply and total social financing growth will be generally in line with nominal economic growth this year.
  • Such guidance is reflected in the money supply growth. Growth of broad M2, a measurement of the money supply, fluctuated within a narrow range of 9.4%-10.1% in the first quarter (1Q) of 2021. Steady liquidity supply anchored the market interest rate, as the six-month Shanghai Interbank Offered rate was 2.75%-2.85% during the quarter.
  • Coupons on the most senior tranches of auto loan ABS mainly remained at the 4Q 2020 level. Some repeat issuances offered less than 3% coupon rates for March issuance though.

Chart 2


New Issuance Trends

Momentum continued
  • New securitization issuance volume reached Chinese renminbi (RMB) 602.7 billion (US$93 billion) in 1Q 2021, an increase of 38% year over year (yoy). We believe strong economic recovery supported the ongoing growth in new issuance.
  • The increase can be largely attributed to the strength of RMBS issuance, with a yoy growth of 183%.
  • Another factor leading to the growth was the continued significant issuance of corporate-related ABS, including supply chain ABS and trade receivables. This mostly reflected activity via schemes managed by China Securities Regulatory Commission and China's National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors. The issuance volume under both regulatory regimes reached RMB380.4 billion (US$59 billion), an increase of 20% yoy.
  • Auto loan ABS issuance exhibited a significant 33% yoy growth. However, we believe this has to do with seasonality. We still expect flat-to-modest growth in auto loan ABS in 2021.
  • For centrally regulated consumer loan ABS, which draws increasing attention from offshore investors, the issuance volume was RMB4.5 billion, falling by 43% yoy. Retail sales gradually resuming to the pre-COVID-19 trend and revival in real private consumption could support the broad consumer ABS issuance this year.

Chart 3


Chart 4


Chart 5


Auto Loan ABS Issuance

Issuance was buoyant alongside a pick-up in auto sales
  • Total issuance of RMB61.6 billion by captive auto finance companies (AFCs) across 10 transactions translates to 33% yoy growth in 1Q 2021. The ongoing pick-up in auto sales since the second half of 2020 has fueled auto loan ABS issuance growth.
  • The auto loan ABS market was buoyed by issuance from frequent originators. Some local AFCs also made repeat issuances and attempted to tap offshore investors.
  • In light of the increasing importance of environmental, social and governance (ESG), a greater number of EV models are likely to launch in China in the next 12 months, boosting auto loans that will finance the purchase. However, we do not anticipate EV-backed auto loans to account for a meaningful portion of the securitized pool across transactions during this period.
  • More leasing companies will explore the feasibility of tapping offshore investors, although this trend is still at its early stage.

Chart 6


RMBS Issuance

Momentum may slow down despite an active first quarter
  • In 1Q 2021, 17 RMBS transactions totaling RMB135.3 billion were issued, a yoy increase of 183% in terms of issue size.
  • The significant growth was partly due to the low base in 1Q 2020 in which the issuance amount dropped by nearly 30% yoy.
  • The active issuance in 1Q 2021 was supported not only by major bank sponsors but also by small to midsized banks.
  • The increasing issuance reflects the need for loan book management. Over the next two to four years, banks have to comply with the tightening regulations that took effect in January 2021 on their exposure to the real estate sector.
  • Despite an active 1Q 2021, RMBS issuance may lose steam. Regulators' view on the property market and property price movement are critical and will affect issuance this year.

Chart 7


Auto Loan ABS Performance

Delinquency rates remained stable
  • Delinquency rates remained stable in the 1Q 2021 as economic recovery has been positive.
  • The weighted average M2 (31-60 days past due) and M3 (61-90 days past due) ratios for all outstanding auto loan ABS transactions have been largely flat, at 0.09% and 0.05%, respectively.
  • The auto transactions we rate maintained low delinquencies. The weighted average M2 and M3 ratios of these rated transactions remained at 0.04% and 0.02% in March.
  • We observed a spike in M1 ratio (1-30 days past due) in January and February, which was attributable to the operational practice of some AFCs, and we had seen a similar spike back in October 2020. In our view, there has been no significant change in the credit quality of the underlying pools. The ratio fell back into the normal range of below 1% in March.

Chart 8


The cumulative default rate stayed low
  • The cumulative default rates were largely similar to that in 4Q 2020 and overall stayed low.
  • For 2019 and 2020 vintages, the rate increased marginally by 4 basis points (bps)-5 bps at the end of 1Q, attributed to the broadly stable collateral performance.
  • We expect the economic recovery and favorable pool attributes such as low loan-to-value ratios and higher seasoning relative to the initial loan tenor to underpin the steady performance of auto loan ABS.

Chart 9


RMBS Performance

Rated RMBS pools post stable performance
  • For our rated RMBS transactions, the delinquencies of M1 ratio stayed low at around 0.24% at the end of 1Q 2021.
  • The M2 and M3 ratios remained below 0.1%.
  • The M4+ ratio (90+ days past due) has been relatively flat and maintained under 0.5% as our rated transactions became more seasoned over time.
  • We assessed the time required to work out the defaulted loans in one of our rated 2018 RMBS transactions. The observation is still limited because there are less than 30 defaulted loans being fully repaid according to the trust reports. Based on the very small sample pool from the trust reports, we estimate the time required from overdue to fully recovered to be 18-24 months. We expect the time required for workout to gradually increase as the transaction becomes more seasoned. It might still be a while before we see such figures plateau.

Chart 10


Slight increase in cumulative default rates
  • The increase in the cumulative default rate of most of the vintages was minimal at 3bps-7bps as of the end of 1Q 2021.
  • The cumulative default rate of most of the vintages stayed below 0.7%.
  • We believe the asset performance will remain stable, given steady economic recovery and tightened government policies in real estate and mortgage lending.

Chart 11


Prepayment remained constant during 1Q
  • The constant prepayment rate (CPR) for bank-issued RMBS transactions was 11%-13% in 1Q 2021.
  • We expect the CPR to fluctuate between 8% and 12% in the next 12 months.

Chart 12


Consumer Loan ABS Performance

Delinquencies held steady in 1Q
  • Given the unsecured nature of consumer loans, the asset performance of consumer loan ABS per Credit Assets Scheme (CAS) tends to be more volatile than that of auto loan ABS and RMBS.
  • The M2 ratio of the consumer loan ABS we tracked stayed at around 1% in 1Q 2021, much higher than the less than 0.2% most of time for auto loan ABS and RMBS.
  • The M3 ratio was also closely tracking the trend of M2 ratio, hovering at 1%.
  • We expect the collateral performance of consumer loan ABS would be largely stable. Some originators might have placed greater emphasis on asset quality over asset growth. We believe such a strategy transformation helps the collateral performance of consumer loan ABS in the long term.

Chart 13


New Issuances In 1Q 2021

Rating Actions In 1Q 2021

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:KY Stephanie Wong, Hong Kong +852 2533 3529;
Secondary Contacts:Jerry Fang, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3518;
Yilin Lou, Hong Kong +852 2533 3524;
Research Assistants:Carol Hu, Hong Kong
Melanie Tsui, Hong Kong

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back