Key Takeaways
- We believe any high-profile defaults or restructurings by a major developer would squeeze industry funding, with effects rippling through the sector, hurting even highly rated names.
- Under this scenario, sales volumes of primary residences in 2025 would fall to about half of our base-case forecast of 20,000 units and home prices could fall 5%-7%.
- Developer margins would be squeezed, raising debt leverage.
Hong Kong's residential property recovery may be slipping out of view. S&P Global Ratings believes that any distress event involving major Hong Kong developers could trigger cascading effects, hitting the financial strength of rated entities and raising the risks of bondholders.
We see growing downside risks to our base case that Hong Kong's home prices will stabilize (see "Hong Kong Residential Property In 2025: Volume Will Rise, Not Price," published on RatingsDirect on Nov. 10, 2024).
Why Are We Talking About This Now?
Speculation is building in the Hong Kong market about credit pressures on some local developers.
Indeed, New World Development Co. Ltd. (unrated) issued announcements on Jan. 20 and Jan. 23, 2025, on the Hong Kong exchange addressing "rumours and speculations in relation to the Group's operations as well as its financial indebtedness." The company added that it was carrying out its businesses as usual and that it had refinanced about HK$17.8 billion of bank loans since July 2024. New World is a major Hong Kong developer and a well-known name among homebuyers.
Investors are asking us how a hypothetical major credit event would affect the wider property market in Hong Kong, and we address that scenario here.
Although rated Hong Kong developers have strong liquidity, the buffers among some unrated developers look thin (see table 5 in Appendix). To replenish their liquidity, some have tapped shareholders for cash injections, or have sold assets (see "Hong Kong's Easing Property Policy Isn't A Quick Fix," March 5, 2024).
However, it's possible that shareholders' willingness to support a developer may wane, and that negotiations on asset sales might fall through. In such scenarios, the weak liquidity positions of some developers may bloom into full-blown financial distress. A credit event, although not our base case, is plausible.
A Major Default Could Have Negative Industrywide Implications
We believe a high-profile default by a major developer would hit market confidence. Prospective homebuyers may delay purchases.
Under this scenario, sales volumes of primary residences in 2025 would fall to about half of our base-case forecast of 20,000 units. Hong Kong's home prices could fall 5%-7% in the year as demand shrinks amid a supply overhang (see table 1).
Table 1
A major credit event would likely tip Hong Kong's residential property market back to downturn | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price change (%) | Primary transaction volume (units) | |||||
2025 base case | Flat | 20,000 | ||||
2025 if a major credit event happens | -5 to -7 | About 10,000 | ||||
All figures are our estimates. Source: S&P Global Ratings. |
Hong Kong's completed and unsold inventory stood at 27,000 units as at end 2024, according to government data. In our view, Hong Kong developers could likely comfortably cover all their sales this year with inventory held over from 2024.
To put this overhang in context, Hong Kong primary sales peaked in 2019 at 21,108 units. Nevertheless, developers are still building: about 68,000 units of new supply are set for completion over the next three to four years.
Hong Kong Market's Gains From Falling Rates May Fade
Our expectation that Hong Kong's residential property market will stabilize largely rests on the view that mortgage rates will ease. However, Hong Kong's lending rates are tied to levels in the U.S., where the path to interest-rate cuts is looking less clear cut.
We view the Trump economic program as likely inflationary. Long-term rates could ultimately remain higher than levels seen in recent years globally (see "Monetary Easing: What If The Interest Rate Descent Disappoints?" Dec. 4, 2024).
If the U.S. Federal funds target rate is higher than our current forecast, this would hurt the Hong Kong property market (see "After Trump's Win, What's Next For The U.S. Economy?" Nov. 7, 2024). The U.S. Federal Reserve left rates unchanged at its January 2025 meeting.
Rated Developers Could Face A Further Margin Squeeze
The developers we rate are among the most reputable in the sector, and would likely withstand the aftershocks of a major credit event. However, events would hit margins: we believe entities would cut prices to sustain project sell-through rates and to grab market share.
An industry downturn would hit the sales of less competitive developers harder. This has been the pattern during the declines seen over the past three years.
Nevertheless, a credit event would hit confidence and demand across the sector. All issuers' debt leverage would rise, in our view. We assume rated developers with slim rating buffers would continue to tightly control debt levels, largely by curtailing spending on land and other investments.
Table 2
Rated developers with narrow buffers will likely tightly control their debt levels | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. |
Nan Fung International Holdings Ltd. |
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. |
||||||
Rating and outlook | A/Stable/-- | BBB-/Stable/-- | A+/Negative/-- | |||||
Debt to EBITDA as of end of latest fiscal year (x) | 2.7 | 16.3 | 3.6 | |||||
Downside trigger for debt to EBITDA (x) | 3.5 | Qualitative trigger* | 3.5 | |||||
*Debt-to-EBITDA ratio is much weaker than our expectation. Ratings as of Feb.3, 2025. Sources: Company disclosures, S&P Global Ratings. |
Funding Conditions May Tighten
If Hong Kong home prices continued to fall in 2025, funding conditions would tighten, which may trigger a credit squeeze.
Banks are one of the biggest sources of funding for Hong Kong developers, and such lending is highly correlated with home prices (see chart 1). Assuming lending to the sector drops in aggregate in a continued downturn, we believe banks would reserve lending for the higher-quality developers.
Chart 1
Rated developers have strong liquidity; a major credit event would not affect their access to bank funding, in our view. Certain unrated entities of a high standing in the market would also likely maintain access to sizable syndicated bank loans. For example, Hang Lung Properties Ltd. (unrated) was able to sign a five-year HK$10 billion syndicated bank loan recently at a competitive cost for the entity.
More Secured Loans, Higher Subordination Risks
Developers that are not able to get unsecured bank loans may need to pledge their assets for financing.
Most bond-offering documents contain negative-pledge clauses that prevent issuers from pledging assets in a fresh borrowing. However, such language usually does not cover secured bank loans.
Some major unrated property firms have only pledged a small portion of their assets (see table 3). We assume, therefore, that secured loans could serve as one of the major sources of incremental funding for names with thin liquidity buffers. An increase in secured borrowings would increase bondholders' subordination risks, as such fundings are unsecured.
Table 3
Some developers might tap secured loans to replenish liquidity | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating | Investment properties (bil. HK$) | Pledged investment properties ratio* (%) | ||||||
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. |
A+/Negative/-- | 408.42 | 0 | |||||
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. |
A/Stable/-- | 150.19 | 0 | |||||
Nan Fung International Holdings Ltd. |
BBB-/Stable/-- | 81.77 | 23 | |||||
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | 271.31 | 0 | |||||
New World Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | 207.71 | 30 | |||||
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. | Unrated | 193.01 | 0 | |||||
Kerry Properties Ltd. | Unrated | 75.77 | 0 | |||||
Sino Land Co. Ltd. | Unrated | 66.29 | N.A. | |||||
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. | Unrated | 63.27 | N.A. | |||||
Lai Sun Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | 34.68 | 95 | |||||
Emperor International Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | 30.99 | 91 | |||||
Wing Tai Properties Ltd. | Unrated | 18.89 | 21 | |||||
K. Wah International Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | 16.60 | 10 | |||||
HKR International Ltd. | Unrated | 13.92 | 0 | |||||
Kowloon Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | 13.50 | N.A. | |||||
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. | Unrated | 10.90 | 100 | |||||
Chuang's Consortium International Ltd. | Unrated | 7.52 | 85 | |||||
Sea Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | 6.74 | 100 | |||||
Grand Ming Group Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | 6.27 | 100 | |||||
Far East Consortium International Ltd. | Unrated | 6.08 | 58 | |||||
Chevalier International Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | 5.81 | N.A. | |||||
Road King Infrastructure Ltd. | Unrated | 5.27 | 76 | |||||
CSI Properties Ltd. | Unrated | 3.17 | 100 | |||||
Wang On Properties Ltd. | Unrated | 0.07 | 100 | |||||
Ratings as of Feb. 3, 2025. *Ratio of value of all investment properties held to total lending. N.A.--Not available. Sources: Company disclosures, S&P Global Ratings. |
A Negative Feedback Loop May Kick In
If financially distressed developers cannot obtain secured borrowings, they may need to resort to selling assets at steep discounts as buyers vanish. However, this could be their last resort to replenish liquidity, particularly when refinancing looms.
If developers sold iconic investment properties at steeply discounted prices, the valuations of investment properties owned by healthy Hong Kong property companies might be hit. This would weaken entities' ratios of debt to capital, a metric widely monitored by banks and investors.
A major distress event would require a recalibration of our base-case view. Homebuyers' sentiment may turn sour, prices may again fall, funding conditions may tighten, triggering primary home price cuts by developers and price drops in the secondary home market.
We view the stabilization of Hong Kong's residential property market as something less than robust. Projected cuts to interest rates may falter, homebuyer sentiment seems fragile, and the market faces a supply overhang. Adding a default by a major developer to this mix would be throwing the proverbial cat among the pigeons.
Appendix
Table 4
The liquidity buffers among major Hong Kong developers vary sharply | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liquidity metrics for the top six Hong Kong developers by asset size | ||||||||||
Rating | Total assets (bil. HK$) | Liquidity A/B (x) over the next 12 months | Reported cash to short-term* debt (x) | |||||||
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. | A+/Negative/-- | 818.09 | 3.57 | 1.55 | ||||||
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. | A/Stable/-- | 504.46 | 2.12 | 2.11 | ||||||
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | 534.95 | N.A. | 0.62 | ||||||
New World Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | 445.16 | N.A. | 0.65§ | ||||||
Kerry Properties Ltd. | Unrated | 210.53 | N.A. | 1.51 | ||||||
Sino Land Co. Ltd. | Unrated | 180.34 | N.A. | No short-term debt | ||||||
Ratings as of Feb.3, 2025. *Due within 12 months. §According to company disclosures, New World Development refinanced HK$17.8 billion of bank loans from July 2024 to Jan. 23, 2024; reported cash to short-term debt would be 1.13x if we assume all refinanced loans were short-term. N.A.--Not available. Sources: Company disclosures, S&P Global Ratings. |
Table 5
Some unrated developers continue to have thin liquidity buffers | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reported cash to short-term debt (x) | ||||||||||
Rating | Liquidity A/B (x) over the next 12 months* | As of period prior to latest reported period§ | As of latest reported period† | |||||||
Nan Fung International Holdings Ltd. | BBB-/Stable/-- | 4.5 | 2.75 | 6.45 | ||||||
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. | A+/Negative/-- | 3.57 | 2.04 | 1.55 | ||||||
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. | A/Stable/-- | 2.12 | 4.75 | 2.11 | ||||||
Sino Land Co. Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 36.88 | No short-term debt | ||||||
K. Wah International Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 1.55 | 5.41 | ||||||
Chevalier International Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 2.4 | 1.88 | ||||||
Kerry Properties Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 1.44 | 1.51 | ||||||
Sea Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 1.03 | 1.24 | ||||||
Chuang's Consortium International Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 1.86 | 1.1 | ||||||
Lai Sun Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 0.61 | 1.1 | ||||||
Hang Lung Properties Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 1.19 | 1.07 | ||||||
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 2.02 | 1.06 | ||||||
Wing Tai Properties Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 1.39 | 0.88 | ||||||
Road King Infrastructure Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 1.18 | 0.79 | ||||||
New World Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 0.67 | 0.65‡ | ||||||
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 0.5 | 0.62 | ||||||
CSI Properties Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 1.16 | 0.47 | ||||||
HKR International Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 1.25 | 0.27 | ||||||
Kowloon Development Co. Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 0.04 | 0.24 | ||||||
Wang On Properties Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 0.2 | 0.22 | ||||||
Far East Consortium International Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 0.18 | 0.22 | ||||||
Asia Standard International Group Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 0.15 | 0.13 | ||||||
Emperor International Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 0.17 | 0.12 | ||||||
Grand Ming Group Holdings Ltd. | Unrated | N.A. | 0.07 | 0.04 | ||||||
Ratings as of Feb. 3, 2024. Short-term debt refers to debt due within the coming 12 months. *Estimates as of June 30, 2024 for Sun Hung Kai Properties, Sept. 30, 2024 for Nan Fung International, June 30, 2024 for CK Asset. §Actual figures as of Dec. 31, 2023 include Sun Hung Kai Properties, Sino Land, New World Development; as of Sept. 30, 2023 includes Nan Fung International, Chevalier International, Chuang's Consortium International, HKR International, CSI Properties, Wang On Properties, Far East Consortium, Emperor International, Asia Standard International Group, Grand Ming; as of July 31, 2023 includes Lai Sun Development; the rest of the companies are as of June 30, 2023. †Actual figures as of Sept. 30, 2024 included Nan Fung International, Chevalier International, Chuang's Consortium International, HKR International, CSI Properties, Wang On Properties, Far East Consortium, Emperor International, Asia Standard International Group, Grand Ming; as of July 31, 2024 includes Lai Sun Development; the rest of the companies are as of June 30, 2024. ‡According to company disclosures, New World Development refinanced HK$17.8 billion of bank loans from July 2024 to Jan. 23, 2024; reported cash to short-term debt would be 1.13x if we assume all refinanced loans were short-term. N.A.--Not available. Sources: Company disclosures, S&P Global Ratings. |
Editor's note: S&P Global Ratings believes there is a high degree of unpredictability around policy implementation by the U.S. administration and possible responses--specifically with regard to tariffs--and the potential effect on economies, supply chains, and credit conditions around the world. As a result, our baseline forecasts carry a significant amount of uncertainty. As situations evolve, we will gauge the macro and credit materiality of potential and actual policy shifts and reassess our guidance accordingly (see our research here: spglobal.com/ratings).
Writer: Jasper Moiseiwitsch
Digital designer: Evy Cheung
Related Research
- Monetary Easing: What If The Interest Rate Descent Disappoints? Dec. 4, 2024
- Hong Kong Residential Property In 2025: Volume Will Rise, Not Price, Nov. 10, 2024
- After Trump's Win, What's Next For The U.S. Economy? published on Nov. 7, 2024
- Hong Kong's Easing Property Policy Isn't A Quick Fix, March 5, 2024
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Edward Chan, CFA, FRM, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3539; edward.chan@spglobal.com |
Wilson Ling, Hong Kong +852 25333549; wilson.ling@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contact: | Lawrence Lu, CFA, Hong Kong + 85225333517; lawrence.lu@spglobal.com |
Research Assistant: | Dengyu Yang, HANGZHOU |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.