HONG KONG (S&P Global Ratings) July 26, 2022--A boycott on mortgage payments in China signals sliding confidence among homebuyers. S&P Global Ratings now expects national property sales will fall 28%-33% this year in the country, almost double the drop of our prior forecast, as people lose faith many developers can complete presold units. This could further squeeze the liquidity of distressed developers, leading to more defaults.
The strikes pick at China developers' reliance on presales. Developers typically ask buyers to pay for residences before they are completed. Such presales account for the bulk of developers' cash inflow.
Homebuyers have withheld payments on mortgages spanning hundreds of residential projects in China, on the view some distressed developers don't have the means to complete the homes. This boycott on payments could easily spread to other developers, in our view.
The real estate sector makes up about 25% of GDP, including direct and indirect effects such as developers' suppliers used in construction, and banks. Our bottom-up analysis shows the country's banks could rack up almost Chinese renminbi (RMB) 1 trillion in at-risk mortgage loans by recent homebuyers boycotts in mortgage payment associated with stalled residential projects (see "China's Mortgage Strike Puts Almost RMB1 Trillion In Bank Loans At Risk," July 26, 2022).
"We continue to expect an 'L-shape' recovery for property sales, bottoming out at RMB12 trillion to RMB13 trillion in 2022, with any recovery likely delayed till early next year," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Esther Liu.
This will certainly hit developer liquidity. Presales proceeds are often upstreamed for debt repayment as long as they meet regulatory requirements. This can serve as a funding means of last resort while most other refinancing channels are shut.
Regulators have subsequently eased many of these measures, signalling on March 16 that policy tightening had bottomed. However, as some distressed developers such as Evergrande have run out of funds to complete homes, the sector is now contending with homebuyers' waning confidence. People have doubts about developers' ability to continue as a going concern. Buyers may also have questions about their own financial standing, as a weak economy means that some are contending with the possibility of job loss or a pay cut.
This further restricts developers' liquidity, hitting the confidence of investors and banks to lend to property firms. Suppliers and services firms would also be less inclined to support distressed developers on the promise of payment down the line.
Buyers are also losing confidence that property as an asset class will continue to appreciate, in our view, with home prices set to fall 6%-7% this year. We assume almost of all this decline happened in the first half and that prices will stabilize from here.
While developers want to sell more units, they also understand further price cuts would hit already-weak buyers' confidence. Price floor policies introduced by local governments will also stop home prices from dropping significantly.
Property Crisis Set To Ensnare Higher Rated Developers
We anticipate the boycott on mortgage payments could presage a liquidity crunch for property firms higher up the ratings spectrum. So far most of the strain has focused on firms within the 'B' ratings category. But we now see greater possibility the crisis may entangle higher rated entities that have so far largely retained their liquidity and funding lines.
"Many firms have already lost access to bank loans and debt raised in both onshore and offshore capital markets. Contracted sales have served as many developers' funding channel, or repayment source of last resort--as long as they meet regulatory requirements. If they now lose presales, because people decline to buy homes from weaker developers, or banks decline to provide mortgages, the firms could quickly tip into distress," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Lawrence Lu.
China rules on presales aim to trap funds at the project level. The goal is to ensure funds are available to carry the homes through the whole building process. However, developers have always found loopholes to extract money from these projects to buy new land or pay down debt. This is particularly true in lower-tier cities, where rules on escrowing are relatively loose, giving firms more leeway to use presales to bolster their liquidity. If developers lose this source of sales, their liquidity risks will grow.
We anticipate there could be a vicious cycle in which weak contracted sales hit cash flow, leading to more defaults. This may shut more developers out of capital markets, with homebuyers staying away from projects developed by entities known to be in financial difficulty.
Likewise, there may also be a flight to quality. Higher rated, state-owned developers or privately owned developers that have been able to tap onshore capital markets would retain more capacity to do presales, in our view. Buyers would likely continue to buy homes from stronger developers on a contracted basis, on the assumption they won't run out of money, and will deliver the homes they promised.
The mortgage strikes mark a significant deterioration in China's property downturn. It is a highly visible and concrete statement of no-confidence in some of the country's biggest developers. While we anticipate regulators will shortly attempt to address the issue, it is very difficult to restore sentiment by fiat. This makes the next leg of the downturn tricky, and risky, for developers.
Writing: Jasper Moiseiwitsch
Related Research
- China's Defaulted Developers Are Running Out Of Time To Exchange And Extend, July 17, 2022
- China's City-Led Property Voucher Plan Won't Replicate Sales Boom Of 2015, July 6, 2022
- China Signals Policy Support For Select Private Developers, June 1, 2022
- China's Property Downcycle Won't End With Policy Easing, April 7, 2022
- Auditor Resignations Flag Governance Risk For China Developers, Feb. 16, 2022
- As The Escrow Flies: China Developers Navigate Convoluted Rules On Presales, Jan. 20, 2022
This report does not constitute a rating action.
The report is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. If you are not a RatingsDirect subscriber, you may purchase a copy of the report by calling (1) 212-438-7280 or sending an e-mail to research_request@spglobal.com. Ratings information can also be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website by using the Ratings search box located in the left column at www.standardandpoors.com. Members of the media may request a copy of this report by contacting the media representative provided.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Esther Liu, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3556; esther.liu@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Lawrence Lu, CFA, Hong Kong + 85225333517; lawrence.lu@spglobal.com |
Research Assistant: | Ivy Yi, Hong Kong |
Media Contacts: | Ning Ma, Hong Kong (852) 2912-3029; ning.ma@spglobal.com |
Michelle Lei, Beijing + 86 10 6569 2961; michelle.lei@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.