articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/250523-default-transition-and-recovery-the-european-speculative-grade-default-rate-could-ease-slightly-to-3-6-by-13495168 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: The European Speculative-Grade Default Rate Could Ease Slightly To 3.6% By March 2026

NEWS

June 23 "This Week In Credit" Newsletter Published: Speculative-Grade Rating Actions In Focus

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: U.S. Corporate Bond Yields As Of June 18, 2025

COMMENTS

Default, Transition, and Recovery: Corporate Defaults In May Reach Highest Level Since October 2020

COMMENTS

Navigating Tariffs' Credit Implications Across Asset Classes


Default, Transition, and Recovery: The European Speculative-Grade Default Rate Could Ease Slightly To 3.6% By March 2026

image

Easing Tariff Tensions Provide Relief, But This Could Prove Temporary

Baseline: S&P Global Ratings Credit Research & Insights expects the European trailing-12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate to fall to 3.6% by March 2026.  This would be a decline from the 4.1% default rate for the 12 months ended March 2025 (see chart 1).

The U.S. administration's 90-day pause related to its recent tariff proposals has encouraged optimism that the trade conflict may not be that damaging for global credit markets. But the negotiation processes are far from over. The U.K. has been the first to reach an outline agreement with the U.S., though this is far from a broader easing of global tariffs, or even resembling pre-April 2 trade relationships, which we believe won't return.

The direct negative impact on Europe appears--at this time--to be comparably less than other U.S. trading partners. Supporting consumers and issuers, interest rates have continued to decline, with EU policy rates closer to their neutral levels, while inflation has been falling. The euro has strengthened, which should continue to help push inflation down.

Given the overall lack of clarity, combined with weaker consumer and business confidence, we anticipate defaults could remain near their current levels by next year, though some increases or declines along the way are likely.

Chart 1

image

Optimistic scenario: We forecast that the default rate could fall to 2.5% by March.  While some level of tariffs by the U.S. is expected, if they are largely limited to 10%, and there is no retaliation, the negative impact could be mitigated for most speculative-grade European issuers. Still, this scenario would depend on economic growth in Europe exceeding our economists' base-case expectation.

Pessimistic scenario: We forecast that the default rate could rise to 5.25%.  In this scenario, after the 90-day pause on U.S. tariffs, the U.S. administration imposes the tariff levels on European countries that it proposed on April 2. Thus far, the U.K., which is the largest contributing country to the speculative-grade population in Europe, has reached an agreement limiting tariffs on U.K. goods entering the U.S. to 10% (with exceptions for specific imports), but this development has been short on detail.

Retaliation by the EU is still a possibility, which could produce even higher cross-border tariffs than already proposed. In this situation, global demand and consumer confidence would sink, with weaker, consumer-reliant industries suffering most.

image

image

Europe Sees Some Tailwinds

Although Europe has been hit less hard by the U.S. administration's tariff moves than other regions, Europe arguably has had the biggest negative turn in sentiment this year. Some of this is understandable given the region has more at stake with its relationship with the U.S. other than trade--namely, the future of mutual defense agreements and efforts, especially amid the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

But by other measures, Europe is arguably benefiting currently. We expect inflation to continue declining this year, in no small part due to the recent appreciation of the euro and pound (see chart 2). The recent strengthening of both currencies has been the result of international investors' growing fears about the role of U.S. Treasuries as a global safe-haven and benchmark.

At the same time, interest rates have been falling, largely led by the European Central Bank (ECB). For the private sector, lower rates are helping to reduce the burden of servicing debt, particularly for corporate loan issuers whose benchmarks are floating rates tied closely to policy rates.

Chart 2

image

As of April 1, debt rated 'CCC'/'C' maturing through year-end 2029 stood at €99 billion (see chart 3), slightly below where it was at the beginning of the year (€102.1 billion). This remains significantly above outstanding 'CCC'/'C' rated debt at the beginning of 2024, when €63.4 billion in outstanding debt was coming due through the following five years (2024-2028).

However, much of the increase in maturing debt among the lower ratings is concentrated. Around one-third (€32.5 billion) was issued by two organizations downgraded to 'CCC'/'C' in 2024: Altice and Ardagh, leaving €66.4 billion among smaller issuers--more comparable to the total at the start of 2024.

Looking beyond the 'CCC'/'C' category, near-term speculative-grade maturities appear largely manageable, with only €41.5 billion coming due in the remainder of 2025 and another €126.5 billion due in 2026. Broader market conditions have become more challenging in recent months, but it isn't until 2028 that speculative-grade maturities expand dramatically, to €270.6 billion.

Chart 3

image

Near-term maturities are concentrated among only a few larger sectors (see chart 4). Telecommunications leads this year's speculative-grade total with just over €8.8 billion due. It ranks high among 'CCC'/'C' maturities as well.

However, given our default rates are based on issuer count and not debt amounts, the top three sectors in terms of near-term maturing debt account for only 11.3% of the speculative-grade population and 20.3% of 'CCC'/'C' rated issuers. Well over half of the 'CCC'/'C' total is attributable to consumer products alone.

Chart 4

image

Primary Markets Take A Step Back In April

In Europe, combined speculative-grade bond and leveraged loan issuance started the year off well (see chart 5). Bond and loan issuance totaled €78 billion through March, roughly in line with the €76 billion through March 2024. But the quickly deteriorating trade environment that led to increased market volatility pushed April issuance down to only €10 billion. As a result, cumulative issuance through April--at €88 billion--was off last year's pace by roughly €20 billion.

Issuance has started to rebound in May, but European markets remain skittish compared with other regions' recent enthusiasm.

Chart 5

image

The relative risk pricing of both bonds and loans (via spreads) reflects markets' still declining credit risk perceptions (see chart 6). The relative risk of holding corporate debt can be a strong indicator of future defaults because companies face pressure if they're unable to refinance maturing debt or service existing debt.

In broad terms, speculative-grade spreads have been good indicators of future defaults based on a roughly one-year lead time. Given current spreads, our baseline default rate forecast of 3.6% is above what the historical trend suggests. Spreads and yields widened somewhat in April as a result of the deteriorating trade environment, but the changes have been historically modest thus far. And in May, we've seen spreads tighten.

However, in contrast to spreads, current yields remain elevated (particularly on loans), increasing the all-in costs of debt that issuers must contend with, regardless of relative risk perceptions. In our view, since the start of the current rate-hiking cycle in 2022, the trend in defaults has been more similar to the trend in yields rather than spreads.

Chart 6

image

Considering broad measures of financial market sentiment, economic activity, and liquidity, the average speculative-grade bond spread in Europe was about 304 basis points (bps) in March, less than half our estimate of 628 bps (see chart 7). The gap between the actual spread and the estimated spread implies that bond markets may be overly optimistic. It also supports the argument that yields, rather than spreads, are the better indicator of financial stress in current conditions.

Chart 7

image

Credit Momentum Remains Stable, For Now

Credit performance has remained largely stable and resilient since 2022, and it's far from the momentum declines that preceded the 2009 and 2020 default cycles--indicating that there are no major spikes in defaults ahead.

In the 12 months ended March 2025, speculative-grade credit quality continued to improve slightly. Net rating actions stayed positive, but only barely. Negative net bias (percentage of issuers with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch negative) implied more downgrades ahead, but it was at its lowest level in the last eight quarters (see chart 8).

Still, net rating actions were only slightly positive in the first quarter. If the global trade situation deteriorates further, net upgrades may give way to net downgrades.

Chart 8

image

The rates of downgrades and net negative bias have tended to lead movement in the default rate by several quarters. Although credit quality among speculative-grade issuers has generally improved since 2021, that hasn't been enough to make up for the declines during 2020. As a result, speculative-grade issuers are still much more vulnerable than they've been historically (see chart 9).

The 'CCC'/'C' category has experienced higher defaults than is typical, historically. And because many of these defaults are distressed exchanges, issuers reemerging from such transactions typically receive a subsequent rating in this category within a short time, keeping the proportion of 'CCC'/'C' issuers high.

Chart 9

image

The share of speculative-grade issuers rated 'B-' and lower declined slightly in first-quarter 2025 but remained significantly above the long-term average.

We classify issuers rated 'B-' and below with negative outlooks or on CreditWatch negative as weakest links. They typically carry the highest default risk, with an overall default rate of approximately 8x that of the broader speculative-grade population. As a result, we monitor these issuers and their sectors regularly.

There were 45 European weakest links as of March 31, 2025, down by five from Dec. 31, 2024 (see chart 10). However, the count of more vulnerable issuers in the 'CCC'/'C' category is nearly unchanged.

Chemicals, packaging, and environmental services lead the weakest links count with seven, followed by a number of sectors with four weakest links each. Among these, telecommunications stands out with all four being rated 'CCC' and below.

The number of weakest links in chemicals, packaging, and environmental services is unchanged from three months ago, underlining heightened risk in this sector. The petrochemical sector is set to remain in a prolonged cyclical trough this year as a general malaise in key markets, such as housing and auto, as well as slower growth in key regions leads to weaker demand. Vulnerabilities are exacerbated by uncertainties around the trade outlook and U.S. tariffs, which are likely to have a direct impact on most European chemical producers.

While chemicals, packaging, and environmental services has the highest number of weakest links, speculative-grade-rated debt maturing over the course of 2025 is relatively low, at €1.7 billion, and predominantly rated 'B' and above.

Chart 10

image

How We Determine Our European Default Rate Forecast

Our European default rate forecast is based on current observations and expectations of the likely path of the European economy and financial markets.   This report covers financial and nonfinancial speculative-grade corporate issuers. The scope and approach are consistent with those of our default and rating transition studies. In this report, our default rate projection incorporates inputs from S&P Global Ratings economists that also inform the analysis of our regional Credit Conditions Committees.

We determine our default rate forecast for speculative-grade European financial and nonfinancial companies based on a variety of quantitative and qualitative factors. The main components of the analysis are credit-related variables (for example, negative ratings bias and ratings distribution), the ECB bank lending survey, market-related variables (corporate credit spreads and the slope of the yield curve), economic variables (the unemployment rate), and financial variables (corporate profits).

For example, increases in the negative ratings bias and the unemployment rate positively correlate with the speculative-grade default rate. As the proportion of issuers with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications increases, or the unemployment rate rises, the default rate usually increases.

This report covers issuers incorporated in the 31 countries of the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and certain other territories, such as the Channel Islands. The full list of included countries is: Austria, Belgium, the British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Guernsey, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, the Isle of Man, Italy, Jersey, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the U.K.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Credit Research & Insights:Nick W Kraemer, FRM, New York + 1 (212) 438 1698;
nick.kraemer@spglobal.com
Paul Watters, CFA, London + 44 20 7176 3542;
paul.watters@spglobal.com
Sarah Limbach, Paris + 33 14 420 6708;
Sarah.Limbach@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.