articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220812-declining-spending-combined-with-higher-rates-could-tip-the-scale-for-b-and-b-rated-u-s-consumer-product-12468566 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Declining Spending Combined With Higher Rates Could Tip The Scale For 'B' And 'B-' Rated U.S. Consumer Products Issuers

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Could The Israel-Iran Escalation Stress Sovereigns, Banks, And Corporates?

COMMENTS

Real Estate Monitor: Slower Growth And Cost Pressure Could Drive Higher Negative Rating Bias

COMMENTS

Navigating Tariffs' Credit Implications Across Asset Classes

COMMENTS

Sustainability Insights: U.S. Health Care Access And Affordability: A Chronic Issue With Heightened Concerns For Credit


Declining Spending Combined With Higher Rates Could Tip The Scale For 'B' And 'B-' Rated U.S. Consumer Products Issuers

Supply chain constraints and rising labor costs have squeezed companies in the consumer products sector, driving many negative rating actions over the past year. Some companies have navigated the pressures by raising prices and cutting costs, but incremental risk is growing because of rising interest rates and the softening macroeconomic backdrop.

S&P Global Ratings economists believe the Fed will likely raise interest rates by 300 basis points (bps) by the end of 2022, having started from zero at the beginning of the year, and reach 3.50%–3.75% by mid-2023. Higher interest rates will add incremental cost pressure to a sector that has already been buffeted by rising costs in freight, transportation, and labor. Meanwhile, weaker macroeconomic conditions and a pullback in consumer spending could be a tipping point for issuers with limited financial flexibility.

We believe companies we rate 'B' and 'B-' will likely be challenged as many are already highly leveraged with moderate to minimal free operating cash flows (FOCF). In the consumer products portfolio, we rate 74% of issuers in the speculative-grade category, of which we rate around half 'B' or 'B-' (chart 1). We have net negative outlooks or CreditWatch with negative implications on more than 10% of issuers we rate 'B' and 'B-', indicating that we believe there is at least a one-in-three chance we could downgrade these companies (chart 2).

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

We analyzed the pool of issuers we rate 'B' and 'B-' to identify those that could be challenged to maintain credit quality in the current interest rate environment. We found that higher interest rates alone are unlikely to have a meaningful impact on credit quality. However, when we applied moderate stress to EBITDA beginning in 2022 and intensifying in 2023—similar to what could occur in a recession—we found credit characteristics could deteriorate which could spur negative rating actions for about half of the companies (table 1). We took into consideration nuances that may be present in subsectors or individual issuers. For instance, the operating environment in a recession for many food and beverage companies tends to be relatively benign as consumers shift to food-at-home from dining out. Similarly, issuers may have positive attributes that partly offset weak earnings, such as a high cash balance that bolsters liquidity.

Our ratings already our reflect our expectation of lingering inflation and supply chain bottlenecks in addition to a softening macroeconomic environment. S&P Global Ratings expects a low-growth recession next year with GDP of just 1.6% and higher unemployment. The odds of avoiding a recession in the next 12 months are slim. It will be difficult for the Fed to navigate a soft landing. A significantly weaker economic backdrop could materialize if the Fed pulls back on rate hikes too soon and inflation becomes more persistent. Conversely, continued rate hikes could spell recession in 2023.

In our weaker-than-expected earnings scenario, we found recurring challenges behind deteriorating credit quality. Not surprisingly, these align with themes that frequently drive credit quality in the sector. The essential nature of a company's product protects it from weaker consumer spending. The more discretionary a company's product or service is, especially higher-ticket durables, the more sensitive it will be to economic cycles. Brand power is critical to effectively passing on costs and maintaining margins. Without brand loyalty, consumers are quick to trade down to a less expensive substitute. Financial markets will likely be choppy amid rising interest rates combined with a weaker economy. Relatively weak issuers with near-term maturities or tight financial covenants could face liquidity crises or refinancing risk.

Exposure To Discretionary Spending Is A Key Risk

As inflationary pressures continue to tighten consumer wallets, the outlook for discretionary spending remains uncertain. Consumers are seeing the prices of their staple products, such as gas and grocery items, increase and this is leaving them with a lower capacity to spend on discretionary products, especially bigger-ticket items. For instance, the outdoor grill category has already been hit hard by supply chain challenges and cost inflation. Manufacturers like Weber Inc., which we downgraded to 'CCC+' in July, and Traeger Inc. (B/Negative/--) now face the double whammy of lower demand for relatively high-priced grills and very difficult comparisons to last year when they benefitted from pulled forward demand during pandemic lockdowns.

Discretionary categories that benefitted from spending patterns while consumers were homebound could also face a dramatic pullback in demand as consumers shift stretched discretionary spending to experiences or travel. Manufacturers such as Gibson Brands (B-/Stable/--), which sells guitars, and SWF Holdings I Corp. (B-/Stable/--), which sells window coverings and accessories, could see a decline in sales as consumers shift their discretionary spending to in-person activities or defer it altogether.

We also see a similar pattern for consumer service companies that are not essential, like WW International (B/Stable/--), a weight management service, and AMS Intermediate Holdings LLC (B-/Stable/--), a residential moving company. Offerings from companies such as these can be deferred or substituted by always cheaper do-it-yourself (DIY) options (for example, eliciting help from friends and family for home moving). We will continue monitoring the rising uncertainty around demand for discretionary products and services.

Presence In Competitive Markets With Slowing Growth

Companies in highly competitive markets are at risk of underperformance and margin degradation as new entrants take market share, leaving larger companies with too much inventory and the need to reduce production volumes. Lower volumes reduce the economies of scale that market leaders typically enjoy and use to offset cost inflation. In the alcoholic beverage sector, for instance, Blue Ribbon LLC (B-/Negative/--) and City Brewing Co. LLC (B/Stable/--) participate in the highly competitive beer and seltzer markets. Recently, these companies' toplines have underperformed and continue to face operational challenges as they navigate the relatively new hard seltzer market which has seen slowing category growth and many new entrants.

Liquidity And Refinancing Risks

Rising interest rates will continue to pressure companies, especially those with refinancing needs over the next 12 months. Higher rates (we believe the Fed will target 3.5% to 3.75% policy rate by mid-2023) could make refinancing more difficult for companies whose cash flows have weakened because of macroeconomic headwinds. In the consumer products sector, some companies face refinancing risk and may face negative rating actions if they cannot successfully refinance their debt in a timely fashion and at manageable rates. Oak Holdings LLC (B-/Stable/--), a sportswear company, uses its revolving credit facility to fund working capital investment in advance of critical selling seasons. The revolver will become current in October 2022, raising the risk that the company could face a liquidity crisis if it is not able to refinance or extend the maturity. Similarly, scholastic and graduation-related product seller Champ Acquisition Corp.'s (B/Stable/--) revolver will become current in December 2022. While these companies have exhibited stable performance recently as they have rebounded from the pandemic, the rising interest rate burdens increase near-term refinancing risk.

Our Scenario And Results

Our analysis includes our base-case assumption of a 150-bp interest rate increase in 2022 and an additional 175 bps in 2023. We then assume a 5% decline in EBITDA in 2022 and an additional 10% in 2023 to simulate earnings decline in a recession. We consider the resulting credit measures such as EBITDA interest coverage and free operating cash flow (FOCF), and implications of lower earnings and higher market interest rates to liquidity. Finally, we consider subsector and issuer-specific nuances that we believe could affect credit quality and the likelihood of a negative rating action.

Table 1

Credit Implications Of Weaker-Than-Expected Macroeconomic Trends
Issuer name Current rating Key credit concern

Champ Acquisition Corp.

B/Stable/-- Weaker performance could pose refinancing risk with December 2023 maturity

CHG PPC Intermediate II LLC

B/Stable/-- Lower demand in casual dining, resulting in higher leverage

City Brewing Co. LLC

B/Stable/-- Operational challenges exacerbated by lower demand leading to weaker-than-expected free cash flow

KNEL Acquisition LLC

B/Stable/-- Refinancing risk with December 2023 maturities; lower demand from trade down

Mad Engine Global LLC

B/Stable/-- Negative free cash flow could lead to tightened liquidity

Monogram Food Solutions LLC

B/Stable/-- Higher-than-expected leverage

PDC Wellness & Personal Care Co.

B/Stable/-- Weaker than expected interest coverage

WW International Inc.

B/Stable/-- Turnaround strategy at risk

Highline Aftermarket Acquisition Parent LLC

B/Negative/-- Higher-than-expected leverage

Instant Brands Holdings Inc.

B/Negative/-- Leverage could be sustained above downgrade trigger

Osmosis Holdings L.P.

B/Negative/-- Higher-than-expected leverage combined with acquisitive track record

Traeger Inc.

B/Negative/-- Weaker-than-expected EBITDA interest coverage

AMS Intermediate Holdings LLC

B-/Stable/-- Higher than expected leverage due to weak EBITDA

Aspire Bakeries Holdings LLC

B-/Stable/-- Lower demand in foodservice. Negative free cash flow could lead to tightened liquidity

Astro Intermediate Holding II Corp.

B-/Stable/-- Weaker-than-expected free cash flow

Balrog Acquisition Inc.

B-/Stable/-- Weaker-than-expected EBITDA interest coverage

BCPE North Star Holdings L.P.

B-/Stable/-- Higher-than-expected leverage if there is trade down or lower demand in casual dining.

Chobani Global Holdings LLC

B-/Stable/-- Negative free cash flow

FFP Holdings Group Inc.

B-/Stable/-- Weaker-than-expected EBITDA interest coverage

Gibson Brands Inc.

B-/Stable/-- Negative free cash flow

LS Parent Corp.

B-/Stable/-- Higher-than-expected leverage

Oak Holdings LLC

B-/Stable/-- Refinancing risk with October 2023 maturity

SWF Holdings I Corp.

B-/Stable/-- Weaker-than-expected free cash flow could lead to liquidity issues

Visual Comfort & Co.

B-/Stable/-- Weaker-than-expected cash flow and EBITDA interest coverage

Blue Ribbon LLC

B-/Negative/-- Rating could be lowered due to weak performance of the group which includes City Brewing Co.

Edward Don & Co. Holdings LLC

B-/Negative/-- Tight liquidity and potentially unsustainable capital structure

Sierra Enterprises LLC

B-/Negative/-- Liquidity at risk and capital structure could become unsustainable

Wahoo Fitness Acquisition LLC

B-/Negative/-- Negative free cash flow could lead to tightened liquidity

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Sadie Mazzola, New York +1 2124387434;
sadie.mazzola@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Sarah E Wyeth, New York + 1 (212) 438 5658;
sarah.wyeth@spglobal.com
Bea Y Chiem, San Francisco + 1 (415) 371 5070;
bea.chiem@spglobal.com
Chris Johnson, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 1433;
chris.johnson@spglobal.com
Amanda C O'Neill, New York + (212) 438-5450;
amanda.oneill@spglobal.com
Gerald T Phelan, CFA, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7031;
gerald.phelan@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Akshay Aggarwal, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P Global Ratings affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in