Key Takeaways
- The Brazilian government is sponsoring a new round of infrastructure auctions aiming at attracting investment and improve the productivity of the economy, along with fostering economic recovery after the pandemic.
- Despite the virus-induced economic shock, air, roadway, port, and railway traffic in Brazil has held up relatively well in 2020, and should experience a similar trend in 2021.
- S&P Global Ratings doesn't expect this auction round to see massive participation from foreign sponsors, given that they're still recovering from the pandemic's harsh economic effect. However, there's sufficient investor appetite for Brazilian infrastructure assets, given the country's still considerable infrastructure shortfall, ample liquidity, and Brazil's favorable regulatory framework.
The new round of concession auctions will kick off starting April 7 and will consist of 22 regional airports, five port terminals, one highway, and one greenfield railroad.
Table 1
Infrastructure Assets Scheduled To Be Auctioned In April 2021* | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Airports | Railways | Ports | Highways | |||||||
Project | South Block (9) | FIOL – section I in Bahia | Four liquid bulk terminals in Itaqui/Maranhao | BR-153/0080/414/Goias-Tocantins | ||||||
North Block (7) | General cargo terminal in Pelotas/Santa Catarina | |||||||||
Central Block (6) | ||||||||||
Auction date | 7-Apr-21 | 8-Apr-21 | 9-Apr-21 | 29-Apr-21 | ||||||
Estimated capex | R$6.13 billion (about $1.1 billion) | R$3.3 billion (about $590 million) | R$612 million (about $110 million) | R$8.46 billion (about $1.5 billion) | ||||||
*For a more details on the planned auction, please see Appendix at the bottom of the article. Source: Brazilian Ministry of Infrastructure |
Despite the success of previous concession auctions, the new round faces short-term challenges, such as:
- The economic outlook will largely be shaped by the pandemic's trajectory. Currently, the country faces the worst phase of the pandemic since the outbreak in early March 2020. The recession and large government support measures led to a record fiscal deficit and a significant surge in government debt in 2020. Congress recently approved a limited fiscal reform. Nevertheless, persistent fiscal uncertainty and high government financing needs could weigh on investors' confidence in the short term.
- Congress is willing to discuss reforms, but faces a crowded agenda. The regulatory agenda has continued to advance – including the recent approval of new frameworks for sanitation and natural gas, which should foster private investment in the country. Cabotage and railway reforms are expected to pass in the coming months. However, political tensions could grow in the short term as the pandemic and economic situation worsen, undermining the approval of new reforms.
Essential Nature Of Infrastructure Services Should Attract Investors
At the same time, the essential nature of the service provided by infrastructure assets have sustained their resilience during the pandemic, as demonstrated by the relatively small number of distressed exchanges and bankruptcy proceeding for the sector's players in 2020 (see "Default, Transition, and Recovery: The 2020 Global Corporate Default Tally Reached 226", published Jan. 8, 2021). Although the industry was directly impacted by the mobility restrictions implemented worldwide to contain the virus, traffic impact was relatively limited in Brazil's ports, roads, and regional airports.
Airports
The drop in air travel in Brazil was deeper than our initial expectations, while we forecast the recovery to pre-pandemic levels after 2023, particularly for international flights as most countries kept their borders closed. At the same time, domestic air travel recovery was strong, as outlined in the graph below, resulting in overall 2020 domestic traffic drop of 53% in comparison with 2019 baseline, versus a drop of 72% for international passengers, which eased the negative performance of regional airports.
While we continue to expect international flights in 2021 to only reach 40%-60% of the 2019 level (see "As COVID-19 Cases Increase, Global Air Traffic Recovery Slows", published Nov. 12, 2020), the pandemic's second wave is hindering the recovery of domestic air travel. The current outbreak in Brazil has been more severe than the first, given the higher rate of infections and deaths, which caused many states to reimpose lockdowns. We expect a dent in the Brazilian air traffic in the next few months until the country overcomes the second wave peak. Domestic traffic should follow the same trend of recovery as observed last year starting in June 2021, as the vaccination campaign accelerates in the second half of the year (see chart 1).
Chart 1
Roads
The drop in roadway traffic in Brazil was milder than our initial estimate dropping 13% in 2020. This was due to the roadways' unique status as the dominant transportation mode in Brazil, as commercial trucks continued to move critical supplies of food, medicine, and to support the businesses that have carried on through the restriction measures. On the contrary, a the light vehicle traffic plummeted due to lockdown measures, while the new working from home framework might have caused a permanent loss of commute traffic.
Similar to air traffic, the recently reimposed lockdowns caused light-vehicle volume to drop more than 20% in the first two weeks of March 2021 (from the 2019 baseline) according to the traffic data for the concessions managed by CCR S.A., in line with traffic performance in the previous year. While we expected a full recovery to 2019 traffic levels in 2021, the severity of the second wave should result in an up to a 15% drop in 2021.
Chart 2
Ports
Contrary to airports' performance, cargo volumes at ports posted an overall 4.4% year-on-year growth in 2020, despite a 4.4% contraction in Brazil's GDP. This was mainly due to exports of bulk solids (iron ore and metals, soybean, sugar, etc.), which represented about 60% of the cargo handled, while handling of bulk liquids accounted for about 25% of total. We continue to expect volumes to grow at least in tandem with GDP, which we forecast at 3.4% for 2021, still benefiting from exports of agricultural and metals commodities.
Chart 3
Limited Appetite Among International Operators
In our view, the global infrastructure players' participation in Brazil's upcoming auctions will be lower, given the following factors:
- Limited appetite to widen their geographic diversification to Brazil, a speculative-grade rated sovereign (BB-/Stable/B); and
- Sponsor's ability to absorb higher capex commitments amid slow recovery, particularly among European airport operators.
Global airport operators, particularly European ones, played a major role in the previous auction rounds for Brazilian airport concessions (see table 2). Some of these groups have a negative outlook with financial metrics close to downgrade triggers, while they're implementing cost-cutting measures, and postponing investments to preserve liquidity and cash flows (see "Europe's 2021 Air Passenger Traffic Likely To Stall At 30%-50% Of 2019 Level," published Feb. 18, 2021).
Table 2
European Sponsors' Participation In Previous Rounds Of Auctions For Brazilian Airport Concessions | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sponsor | Airport concessions | Committed capex | Rating (as of March 2021) | |||||
AENA | Northest Block (six regional airports: Recife in the state of Pernambuco, Maceio in Alagoas, Joao Pessoa in Paraiba, Aracaju in Segipe. Campinha Grande in Paraiba, Juazeiro do Norte in Ceara in the fifth wave in 2019) | R$2.15 billion. Grant fee: R$1.9 billion | Not rated | |||||
Fraport AG | Fortaleza in the state of Ceara and Porto Alegre in Rio Grande do Sul, both in 2017 | Not rated | ||||||
VINCI Airports | Salvador in the state of Bahia in 2017 | A-/Stable | ||||||
Flughafen Zürich AG | Confins in the state of Minas Gerais in 2013*. Florianapolis in Santa Catarina in 2017. | A+/Negative | ||||||
Southeast Block (two regional airports: Vitoria in the state of Espirito Santo and Macae in Rio de Janeiro) in the fifth wave in 2019 | R$592 million. Grant fee of R$437 million | Not rated | ||||||
*A 51% ownership of a joint venture with CCR S.A., the rest owned by Infraero Source: S&P Global Ratings, ANAC |
The potentially lower participation of international bidders in the next round of concessions might open the door for domestic and regional players. In the previous round, a Brazilian joint venture (Sociacam Terminais Rodoviarios and Sinart-Sociedade Nacional de Apio Rodoviario) won the concessions to operate the Center-West block (four airports in the state of Mato Gross). The joint venture committed to pay R$40 million as a grant fee and invest R$791 million into airports.
In the case of Ferrovia de Integração Oeste-Leste – FIOL, we believe that short- to medium-term challenges would likely limit the number of interested players, both domestic and international. This asset is a greenfield railway in the southern area of Bahia state, divided into three tranches. The first section that's been auctioned now is still under construction (about 80% completed) and will connect mainly an iron ore production facility with a new port of Porto Sul, to be constructed near city of Ilheus in the same area of Bahia. There are timing uncertainties for the construction of this port, along with counterparty risk because the main offtaker will be a relatively small iron ore producer (Minas da Bahia Mineração – Bamin). Bamin's controlling group is currently under investigation for corruption, and the project could also face environmental risks, which could lead to reputational issues for the new concessionaire. The other two sections of FIOL are still under construction (section II), or in the study/project phase (section III), with no clear view about when the entire stretch of railway would be fully operational. After the three sections are completed, the railway would connect with the Ferrovia Norte-Sul railway and could be an alternative route for grain exports from the center-west region of the country.
Auctions Could Offer A Silver Lining
Before the pandemic, Brazil's potential growth was about 2%, one of the lowest rates among emerging markets. Even though the 4.4% GDP contraction in 2020 was milder than most of its regional peers, raising the country's long-term GDP growth rate--estimated at 3.4% in 2021 and 2.5% in 2022--depends on reforms to increase productivity and private investment (see "Despite Growth Picking-Up, Pre-Pandemic Weaknesses Remain" published on March 25, 2021). The challenges of Brazilian infrastructure's quality and capacity are caused by limited investment in recent years (around 15% of GDP in the past five years). The government has had very limited fiscal room to fund public investment, given the structural fiscal crisis. Microeconomic and regulatory reforms--which don't require constitutional amendments--are more likely to continue to advance in the short term, supporting private-sector participation in various industries.
Despite the end of the monetary easing policy following the recent hike of the domestic basic interest rate to 2.75% per year, the still low interest rates offer attractive conditions to invest in infrastructure assets. The new round of concessions could benefit from the ample liquidity in the capital markets, which alleviates the cost of capital and the inherently strong market position of these assets, which are typically monopolies in the areas that they serve, with the exception of ports leases.
Finally, these concessions operate under the regulatory framework that we view as favorable and relatively stable. The framework boasts a good track record of contract performance and regulatory oversight, with more than 20 years for roadway and port concessions, and almost 10 years for airports. We observed either economic or financial compensation mechanisms during regulatory intervention in rate readjustments. In addition, the regulator reduced grant amounts for airport concessions tom compensate for severe traffic losses caused by the pandemic.
Appendix
Details On Concession Auctions Scheduled For April 2021 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Concession | Assets | Investment | |
Airports | South Block 9 | Bage/Rio Grande do Sul | Capex: R$2.85 billion |
Capacity: 12.2 million passengers per year | Pelotas/Rio Grande do Sul | Planned grant fee: R$516 million | |
Concession term: 30 years | Uruguaiana/Rio Grande do Sul | Opex: R$9.1 billion | |
Joinville/Santa Catarina | Reference IRR: 7.23% | ||
Navegantes/Santa Catarina | Auction criteria: greatest grant (up front) | ||
2 Curitiba/Parana | |||
Foz do Iguaçu/Parana | |||
Londrina/Parana | |||
Airports | North Block 7 | Manaus/Amazonia | Capex: R$1.48 billion |
Capacity: 4.6 million passengers per year | Tabatinga/Amazonia | Planned grant fee: R$44 million | |
Concession term: 30 years | Tefé/Amazonia | Opex: R$6.1 billion | |
Porto Velho/Rondonia | Reference IRR: 9.36% | ||
Rio Branco/Acre | Auction criteria: greatest grant (up front) | ||
Cruzeiro do Sul/Acre | |||
Boa Vista/Roraima | |||
Airports | Central Block 6 | Goiânia /Goias | Capex: R$1.8 billion |
Capacity: 7.4 million passengers per year | Palmas/Tocantins | Planned grant fee: R$50 million | |
Concession term: 30 years | São Luís/Maranhao | Opex: R$6.3 billion | |
Imperatriz/Maranhao | Reference IRR: 8.3% | ||
Teresina/Piaui | Auction criteria: greatest grant (up front) | ||
Petrolina/Pernambuco | |||
Port | IQI03 | Itaqui Port/Maranhao | Expected investment: R$106.5 million |
Brownfield | Terminal area: 25,726 m3 | Monthly rental: R$360,300 | |
Vocation: Charge-liquid bulk | Static capacity: 46,406 m³ (39.445 t) | Variable rental value: R$11.38 per ton | |
Lease term: 20 years | Reference IRR: 9.38% | ||
Auction criteria: Highest grant | |||
Port | IQI11 | Itaqui Port/Maranhao | Expected investment: R$133.3 million |
Brownfield | Terminal area: 33,217 m3 | Monthly rental: R$699,000 | |
Vocation: Charge-liquid bulk | Static capacity: 64,897 m³ (55.162 t) | Variable rental value: R$14.94 per ton | |
Lease term: 20 years | Reference IRR: 9.38% | ||
Auction criteria: Highest grant | |||
Port | IQI12 | Itaqui Port/Maranhao | Expected investment: R$177.3 million |
Brownfield | Terminal area: 34,183 m² | Monthly rental amount: R$171,000 | |
Vocation: Charge-liquid bulk | Static capacity: 78,722 m³ | Variable rental value: R$4,34 per ton | |
Lease term: 20 years | Reference IRR: 9.38% | ||
Auction criteria: Highest grant | |||
Port | IQI13 | Itaqui Port/Maranhao | Expected investment: R$178.5 million |
Brownfield | Terminal area: 32,078 m² | Monthly rental amount: R$166,600 | |
Vocation: Charge-liquid bulk | Static capacity: 78,722 m³ | Variable rental value: R$4,23 per ton | |
Lease term: 20 years | Reference IRR: 9.38% | ||
Auction criteria: Highest grant | |||
Port | PEL01 | Pelotas/Santa Catarina | Expected investment: R$16 million |
Brownfield | Terminal area: 23.510 m² | Monthly rental amount: R$100,400 | |
Vocation: General cargo | Static capacity: 13,500 t | Variable rental value: R$2,08 per ton | |
Lease term: 15 years | Reference IRR: 9,38% | ||
Auction criteria: Highest grant | |||
Highway | BR-153/080/414/GO/TO | Direction: N-S – Anapolis/Goias to Aliança do Tocantins/Tocantins | Expected investment: R$8.46 billion |
850.7 km | Opex: R$6.17 billion | ||
Traffic: Vehicle equivalent: 124,000 per day (tear 2) | Fare: Single track R$12,175/100 km; double track R$17,045/100 km. | ||
Concession term: 35 years | Reference IRR: 8.47% | ||
Auction criteria: Lowest fare (limited discount: 16.25%) and highest grant as a tiebreaker criterion | |||
Railway | EF-334 – FIOL | Bahia | Expected investment: R$3.3 billion, of which R$1.6 billion to complete the works |
537 km under construction | Current situation: work carried out by VALEC. It has a physical advance 76.2% and received approximately R$2.39 billion in investments. | Opex: R$2.55 billion | |
Expected load (in millions of tons per year, every 10 years): 18.4 t (2025); 51.9 t (2035); 52.8 t (2045); 33.8 t (2054) | Grant amount: Higher grant amount (minimum of R$32 million) | ||
Concession term: 35 years (extension prohibited) | Reference IRR: 11.04% |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Julyana Yokota, Sao Paulo + 55 11 3039 9731; julyana.yokota@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Livia Honsel, Mexico City + 52 55 5081 2876; livia.honsel@spglobal.com |
Luisa Vilhena, Sao Paulo + 55 11 3039 9727; luisa.vilhena@spglobal.com | |
Marcelo Schwarz, CFA, Sao Paulo + 55 11 3039 9782; marcelo.schwarz@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.