Canadian credit card asset-backed securities (ABS) performance remained strong in second-quarter 2019 as Canadian credit card receivables continued to demonstrate stable and strong credit metrics, including high seasoning and credit quality. Over the 10-year business cycle through June 2019, yield and payment rate increased to 23.6% and 44.0%, respectively, from 18.9% and 30.1% as of June 2009. Similarly, 30-plus day delinquencies and net loss rate (charge-offs) declined to 3.0% and 1.9%, respectively, from highs of 6.1% and 3.2%, as Canada's unemployment rate decreased to 5.5% from 8.6%. Credit card receivables increased through organic growth and new programs to C$52 billion as of June 2019 from C$43 billion a decade earlier.
The improved performance and strong credit metrics support issuance volumes, increasingly through cross-border transactions into the U.S. market. Seven Canadian credit card ABS transactions were issued during the six months ended June 2019. About 89.0% of the C$6.06 billion issued, or US$4.05 billion, were cross-border transactions in the U.S.--a 5% increase from the US$4.03 billion transacted through June 2018. The six transactions accounted for about 33% of the total U.S. bank-credit card ABS volume, providing liquidity and investment opportunity to the U.S. market at a time of declining volumes from U.S. bank-card issuers.
Issuance Declined Year-Over-Year
Overall, Canadian credit card ABS issuance volume declined about 31% to C$6.06 billion as of June 2019 from C$8.83 billion a year earlier, primarily due to reduced Canadian dollar-denominated issuance in the Canadian market.
The relatively lower Canadian volume is consistent with our expectation for 2019 credit card volume to be lower than the previous year's due to refinancing of maturing ABS (C$9 billion) and marginal growth in new issuance (C$3 billion). We expect U.S. dollar-denominated issuance to remain strong. However, total issuance will depend on issuers' funding needs and market conditions (see charts 1 and 2; note that we rounded the numbers in this report to one decimal point, but percent changes are based on unrounded figures).
The slow-down in issuance, coupled with a strong performance matrix (low charge-off, strong payment rate, high excess spread, and seasoned and diversified collateral pools) could be a credit positive for Canadian credit card ABS spreads.
Chart 1
Chart 2
Cross-Border Transactions: Funding Diversification
For the six-months ended June 2019, the top five Canadian banks (Bank of Montreal, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Royal Bank of Canada, The Bank of Nova Scotia, and Toronto-Dominion Bank) conducted six U.S. cross-border transactions totaling US$4.05 billion out of Canada-domiciled trusts backed by Canadian dollar-denominated credit card receivables (see table 1). Across the border, the number and volume of U.S.-domiciled credit card ABS transactions continued to decline (see table 2).
Table 1
2019 U.S. Dollar-Denominated Canadian Credit ABS | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sponsor | Credit card trust | Amount (mil. $) | No. of transaction | |||||
Bank of Montreal | Master Credit Card Trust | 476.2 | 1 | |||||
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | Cards II Trust | 600.0 | 1 | |||||
Royal Bank of Canada | Golden Credit Card Trust | 550.0 | 1 | |||||
The Bank of Nova Scotia | Trillium Credit Card Trust | 1,358.7 | 2 | |||||
Toronto-Dominion Bank | Evergreen Credit Card Trust | 1,069.5 | 1 | |||||
(i)Issuance as of June 30, 2019. ABS--Asset-backed securities. |
Table 2
Canadian And U.S. Credit Card ABS Issuance | ||
---|---|---|
(No. of transactions) | ||
Canada | U.S. | |
1Q 2018 | 5 | 10 |
2Q 2018 | 4 | 14 |
3Q 2018 | 5 | 12 |
4Q 2018 | 4 | 6 |
1Q 2019 | 5 | 6 |
2Q 2019 | 2 | 3 |
Notwithstanding the reduced issuance volumes in the U.S. market, general market uncertainties pushed ABS spreads wider and Canadian credit card ABS issuers continue to face wider issuance spreads in the U.S. market relative to their U.S. peers. Although U.S. cross-border issuances could result in cost savings when compared to existing Canadian credit card ABS trading spreads or potential new issue spread in the Canadian market, they also provide funding diversification for Canadian issuers.
Canadian Receivables: Performance Still Strong Despite Consumer Indebtedness
Canadian credit card receivables continue to demonstrate strong credit metrics such as high seasoning, diversification, and credit quality. On average, approximately 83% of the receivables are accounts aged at least five years, which leads to stable payments and performance. In addition, approximately 34% of Canadian credit card ABS receivables comprise accounts that can be classified as "super prime." The receivables are also geographically diverse, with province exposure consistent with the nation's population distribution.
Canadian credit card ABS performance remained strong in the second quarter. The receivables balance in the Canadian Credit Card Quality Index (CCQI) increased to $52.1 billion as of June 2019 from C$50.8 billion as of June 2018. Collateral performance of the credit card receivables backing Canadian credit card ABS transactions has generally remained within our expectations. In second-quarter 2019, the 30-plus-day delinquency rate of 1.9% and charge-off rate of 3.0% remained steady compared with 1.93% and 2.9%, respectively, a year earlier. The payment rate also stayed robust, with the 12-month average increasing to 45.2% as of June 2019 from 45.1% the prior year. These figures positively affect yield and excess spread, which averaged 23.9% and 17.1%, respectively, during second-quarter 2019.
The strong receivables performance reflects many factors, including favorable credit fundamentals, conservative underwriting standards, established credit relationships within issuers' framework, and prudent consumer behavior, influenced by the full recourse credit regime.
Canadian consumer debt service ratio increased to 14.9% as of first-quarter 2019, nearing the historical high of 15.0% as of December 2007. The 14.9% debt service ratio includes 6.7% mortgage debt and 8.2% other consumer debt. Household savings as a proportion of disposable income decreased to 1.1% as of first-quarter 2019 from 1.9% as of first-quarter 2018 (see chart 3). Despite this weakening consumer profile, prudent consumer behavior, influenced by the full recourse credit regime and conservative lending practices at banks, will continue to balance the risks of consumer affordability.
We expect Canadian credit card ABS transactions will continue to benefit from strong performance, and we will continue to monitor the credit quality of the receivables relative to the credit enhancement available to each class.
Chart 3
The Relative Value
Comparatively, Canadian credit card receivables have historically performed better than U.S. bankcard receivables (see table 3).
Table 3
Comparative Performance Of S&P Global Ratings' CCQIs | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average for the 12 months ended Dec. 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average for the six months ended June 30, 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canada | U.S. | Canada | U.S. | Canada | U.S. | Canada | U.S. | Canada | U.S. | |||||||||||||
Average principal receivables outstanding (bil.) | C$50.91 | US$188.02 | C$50.74 | US$191.00 | C$49.82 | US$204.17 | C$44.26 | US$211.38 | C$34.11 | US$234.16 | ||||||||||||
Annualized portfolio yield (%) | 23.57 | 20.34 | 23.48 | 19.55 | 23.15 | 18.65 | 23.13 | 18.36 | 23.03 | 18.23 | ||||||||||||
Avg. monthly payment rate (%) | 44.04 | 29.59 | 45.50 | 28.54 | 44.73 | 27.21 | 43.53 | 26.48 | 42.38 | 25.88 | ||||||||||||
Delinquencies of 30 days or more (%)(i) | 1.94 | 1.46 | 1.90 | 1.53 | 2.23 | 1.56 | 2.31 | 1.52 | 2.21 | 1.51 | ||||||||||||
Annualized net losses | 3.02 | 2.42 | 2.88 | 2.38 | 3.03 | 2.31 | 3.23 | 2.13 | 3.16 | 2.20 | ||||||||||||
Excess spread (%) | 16.94 | 14.13 | 17.30 | 13.63 | 17.14 | 13.24 | 16.67 | 13.37 | 16.30 | 13.39 | ||||||||||||
(i)The delinquency rate is for the last month for each year. CCQI--Credit Card Quality Index. |
Over the past five years, the Canadian CCQI payment rates and yields have significantly outperformed the U.S. bankcard CCQI (see charts 4a and 4b). Most Canadian bank originators tend to have robust reward and loyalty programs linked to their cards, resulting in payment rates of around 44%, compared with approximately 30% in the U.S. Furthermore, the Canadian CCQI yield of approximately 24% is also higher, compared with the U.S. bankcard CCQI yield of 20%. Canadian credit cards tend to have high annual percentage rates (APRs), which stem from less stringent usury laws. Although APR is a major driver of yield, other components of yield, such as interchange and annual fees, could also contribute to the higher Canadian yield. Most Canadian credit cards are issued from just six major banks, whereas the banking sectors in the U.S. are highly competitive, creating downward pressure on credit card APRs.
Although the Canadian CCQI payment rates and yields have historically outperformed the U.S. bankcard CCQI's by wide margins, Canadian charge-offs and 30-plus-day delinquencies are roughly in-line with their U.S. counterparts (see charts 4c and 4d). The Canadian CCQI charge-off rate is approximately 3.0%, compared with 2.4% in the U.S. We believe higher unemployment rates is one of the driving factors of credit card charge-offs. As of June 2019, the Canadian unemployment rate was 5.5%, whereas the U.S. unemployment rate was 3.7%. Still, despite Canada's higher unemployment rate, the Canadian CCQI charge-off rate has remained in-line with the U.S. bankcard CCQI charge-off rate, demonstrating high obligor credit quality.
Chart 4a
Chart 4b
Chart 4c
Chart 4d
Canadian CCQI Highlights
The Canadian CCQI tracks the performance of approximately C$52.1 billion in credit card receivables from eight major Canadian trusts that issue credit card ABS.
We observed the following performance trends in the Canadian CCQI as of second-quarter 2019:
- The three-month average principal receivables totaled C$51.7 billion, up 2.5% year-over-year and 3.3% from first-quarter 2019.
- The three-month average charge-off rate was 3.1%, up 3.6% year-over-year and up 5.0% from first-quarter 2019.
- The three-month average 30-plus-day delinquency rate was 1.9%, down 2.9% year-over-year and 7.6% from first-quarter 2019.
- The three-month average total payment rate was 46.1%, up 0.1% year-over-year and 9.6% from first-quarter 2019.
- The three-month average yield was 23.9%, up 0.9% year-over-year and 2.6% from first-quarter 2019.
- The three-month average excess spread was 17.1%, down 1.1% year-over-year and up 2.2% from first-quarter 2019.
Table 4
S&P Global Ratings' Canadian CCQI Three-Month Average Trends | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance period | Q2 2017 | Q2 2018 | Q4 2014 | Q1 2019 | Q2 2019 | |||||||
Outstandings (bil. C$) | 49.8 | 50.5 | 52.1 | 50.1 | 51.7 | |||||||
Yield (%) | 23.3 | 23.7 | 23.7 | 23.3 | 23.9 | |||||||
Payment rate (%) | 45.1 | 46.0 | 47.0 | 42.0 | 46.1 | |||||||
Charge-offs (%) | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 3.1 | |||||||
Delinquencies (%) | ||||||||||||
30-plus-day | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.9 | |||||||
60-plus-day | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | |||||||
90-plus-day | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | |||||||
Base rate (%) | 3.1 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 3.7 | |||||||
Excess spread rate(%) | 17.1 | 17.3 | 17.6 | 16.8 | 17.1 | |||||||
CCQI--Credit Card Quality Index. |
Chart 5
Chart 6
Issuers Versus The Index
Table 5a
Issuers Versus The Index As Of March 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | Seller | Outstanding amount (mil. C$) | Yield (%) | Charge-offs (%) | Base rate (%) | Excess spread rate (%) | Payment rate (%) | 30-plus-day delinquency rate (%) | 60-plus-day delinquency rate (%) | 90-plus-day delinquency rate (%) | ||||||||||||
Canadian CCQI | N/A | 49,922 | 23.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 16.9 | 42.8 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
CARDS II Trust(i) | Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 11,646ii) | 22.0(ii) | 3.2(ii) | 2.9(iii) | 15.9(iii) | 36.6(ii) | 2.4(iii) | 1.4(iii) | 0.8(ii) | ||||||||||||
Golden Credit Card Trust | Royal Bank of Canada | 10,572 | 23.3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 18.6 | 48.2 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
Master Credit Card Trust II(i) | Bank of Montreal | 7,312(ii) | 26.3(ii) | 3.5(ii) | 2.1(iii) | 20.7(iii) | 47.1(ii) | 3.0(iii) | 1.7(iii) | 1.1(ii) | ||||||||||||
Glacier Credit Card Trust | Canadian Tire Bank | 3,786 | 20.0 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 10.0 | 24.6 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Eagle Credit Card Trust(i) | President's Choice Bank | 2,174(ii) | 23.6(ii) | 2.9(ii) | 4.6(iii) | 16.1(iii) | 56.8(ii) | 1.5(iii) | 0.9(iii) | 0.6(ii) | ||||||||||||
Canadian Credit Card Trust II(i) | National Bank of Canada | 1,769(ii) | 25.2(ii) | 3.7(ii) | 1.7(iii) | 19.8(iii) | 47.5(ii) | 1.8(iii) | 1.1(iii) | 0.8(ii) | ||||||||||||
Evergreen Credit Card Trust | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 8,260 | 22.9 | 2.1 | 4.3 | 16.5 | 45.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Trillium Credit Card Trust II | The Bank of Nova Scotia | 4,403 | 23.2 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 15.0 | 41.1 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
(i)S&P Global Ratings does not publicly rate the credit card asset-backed securities issued by this trust. (ii)As reported in the issuer's regulatory filing. (iii)Calculated by S&P Global Ratings using information obtained from the issuer's regulatory filings. CCQI--Canadian Credit Card Quality Index. N/A--Not applicable. Source: S&P Global Ratings and issuer regulatory filings. |
Table 5b
Issuers Versus The Index As Of June 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer | Seller | Outstanding amount (mil. C$) | Yield (%) | Charge-offs (%) | Base rate (%) | Excess spread rate (%) | Payment rate (%) | 30-plus-day delinquency rate (%) | 60-plus-day delinquency rate (%) | 90-plus-day delinquency rate (%) | ||||||||||||
Canadian CCQI | N/A | 52,089 | 23.0 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 16.4 | 43.4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
CARDS II Trust(i) | Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 12,028(ii) | 23.5(ii) | 3.7(ii) | 4.5(iii) | 15.3(iii) | 36.7(ii) | 2.2(iii) | 1.2(iii) | 0.7(ii) | ||||||||||||
Golden Credit Card Trust | Royal Bank of Canada | 10,927 | 21.5 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 17.2 | 48.5 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Master Credit Card Trust II(i) | Bank of Montreal | 7,806(ii) | 24.1(ii) | 2.7(ii) | 2.1(iii) | 19.4(iii) | 46.6(ii) | 2.7(iii) | 1.6(iii) | 1.1(ii) | ||||||||||||
Glacier Credit Card Trust | Canadian Tire Bank | 3,886 | 21.3 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 12.0 | 25.0 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Eagle Credit Card Trust(i) | President's Choice Bank | 2,307(ii) | 24.6(ii) | 3.3(ii) | 4.8(iii) | 16.5(iii) | 54.8(ii) | 1.3(iii) | 0.8(iii) | 0.5(ii) | ||||||||||||
Canadian Credit Card Trust II(i) | National Bank of Canada | 1,824(ii) | 26.6(ii) | 3.5(ii) | 1.9(iii) | 21.2(iii) | 48.3(ii) | 1.7(iii) | 1.1(iii) | 0.7(ii) | ||||||||||||
Evergreen Credit Card Trust | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | 8,483 | 21.6 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 15.3 | 47.1 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Trillium Credit Card Trust II | The Bank of Nova Scotia | 4,830 | 25.1 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 16.5 | 44.2 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
(i)S&P Global Ratings does not publicly rate the credit card asset-backed securities issued by this trust. (ii)As reported in the issuer's regulatory filing. (iii)Calculated by S&P Global Ratings using information obtained from the issuer's regulatory filings. CCQI--Canadian Credit Card Quality Index. N/A--Not applicable. Source: S&P Global Ratings and issuer regulatory filings. |
Appendix: CCQI Performance Variables
The CCQI is a monthly performance index that aggregates performance information across credit card ABS transactions in the following key risk areas: receivables outstanding, yield, payment rate, charge-off rate, delinquencies, base rate, and excess spread rate.
We determine each master trust's weighting by dividing its outstanding eligible principal receivables by the total outstanding eligible principal receivables for all trusts included in the index. We then determine the CCQI weighted average performance variables by adding the result of each master trust's variables multiplied by each master trust's respective weighting.
Receivables outstanding
The aggregate outstanding eligible principal receivables of credit card accounts backing each master trust at the end of the collection period.
Yield
The weighted average total trust income for the collection period, as a percentage of eligible principal receivables (annualized).
Total payment rate
The weighted average total monthly collections (obligor principal and finance charge payments), as a percentage of total receivables outstanding.
Charge-off rate
The weighted average losses on principal receivables for the collection period, as a percentage of eligible principal receivables (annualized).
Delinquencies
The weighted average past-due amount for the collection period, as a percentage of the current month's eligible principal receivables.
Base rate
The weighted average cost of funding (the sum of the certificate rate on a securitization and the corresponding transaction servicing fee) for the collection period. For those issuers with ABS not rated by S&P Global Ratings, the base rate is calculated as the difference between the reported yield and charge-off rate for the issuer, less the weighted average excess spread of the issuer based on the outstanding principal balance of each series.
Excess spread rate
The weighted average surplus of cash inflow for the collection period (yield minus charge-offs minus the base rate). For those issuers with ABS not rated by S&P Global Ratings, the excess spread rate is calculated as the weighted average of each series based on the outstanding principal balance.
Related Criteria
- Incorporating Sovereign Risk In Rating Structured Finance Securities: Methodology And Assumptions, Jan. 30, 2019
- U.S. Credit Card Securitizations: Methodology And Assumptions, Aug. 24, 2017
- Structured Finance: Asset Isolation And Special-Purpose Entity Methodology, March 29, 2017
- Methodology: Criteria For Global Structured Finance Transactions Subject To A Change In Payment Priorities Or Sale Of Collateral Upon A Nonmonetary EOD, March 2, 2015
- Global Derivative Agreement Criteria, June 24, 2013
- Criteria Methodology Applied To Fees, Expenses, And Indemnifications, July 12, 2012
- Global Investment Criteria For Temporary Investments In Transaction Accounts, May 31, 2012
- General Methodology And Assumptions For Rating Canadian Credit Card ABS, March 22, 2012
- Criteria - Structured Finance - General: Methodology For Servicer Risk Assessment, May 28, 2009
Related Research
- Credit Conditions North America: Trade Tensions Cloud The Outlook, June 27, 2019
- Quarterly U.S. Credit Card Quality Index: Performance Remains Stable Despite Market Volatility in Fourth Quarter 2018, March 22, 2019
- Canadian Credit Card Quality Index: 2018 Canadian Credit Card Issuance Volumes Exceed 10-Year High, March 19, 2019
- Canadian Credit Card Quality Index: First Quarter 2019 Issuance Declines While Performance Remains Stable, May 23, 2019
- 2019 U.S. And Canadian Credit Card ABS Review, Jan. 14, 2019
- Global Structured Finance Outlook 2019: Securitization Continues To Be Energized With Potential $1 Trillion In Volume Expected Again, Jan. 7, 2019
- Global Structured Finance Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis 2016: The Effects Of The Top Five Macroeconomic Factors, Dec. 16, 2016
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Sanjay Narine, CFA, Toronto + 1 (416) 507 2548; sanjay.narine@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Piper Davis, New York + 1 (212) 438 1173; piper.davis@spglobal.com |
Analytical Managers: | John A Detweiler, CFA, New York (1) 212-438-7319; john.detweiler@spglobal.com |
Frank J Trick, New York (1) 212-438-1108; frank.trick@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.