HONG KONG (S&P Global Ratings) Nov. 10, 2023--China's new bank capital rules will be less onerous than the draft measures proposed in February. The recent changes will likely mitigate strains on Chinese banks' capital buffers amid declining profitability, and help them address their TLAC gap (see "China's Major Banks Still Have An RMB3.7 Trillion Shortfall On TLAC Requirement," Jan. 18, 2023).
The National Administration of Financial Regulation introduced the rules on Nov. 1 to more accurately reflect banks' lending risks. The measures will also bring the country's banking system broadly in line with Basel 3 standards.
The final version allowed a handful of meaningful relaxations. It reduces banks' regulatory capital charges on certain residential mortgages and equity holdings. "China's new capital rules may channel bank resources to policy-supported initiatives," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Michael Huang.
We expect the new capital rules will continue to address emerging strains in the Chinese banking industry (see "China's Tightening Capital Rules To Hit Aggressive Banks," Feb. 22, 2023).
REDUCED CAPITAL CHARGES TO ALLEVIATE MORTGAGE PAIN
The regulators have reduced the risk weights of residential mortgages that meet prudential requirements, from the draft measures for tier-one banks. Among other steps, the rules stipulate that:
- Risk weights are lowered to 20%-50% from 40%-75%, for residential mortgages not relying on rental income, when the loan-to-value ratio (LTV) is below 100%; and
- Risk weights are lowered to 30%-75% from 50%-105% for residential mortgages relying on rental income, when the LTV is below 100%.
Significantly, the final rules are not just a relaxation from the February draft proposal, they are somewhat less strict than the existing standards. Most banks' residential mortgage LTVs are below 80%, which will subject them to below 50% risk weights under the new rules. This is compared with a uniform 50% risk charge under existing capital rules.
"We believe the Chinese regulators want to balance the need for robust risk controls without placing excessive burden on the banks, given they play an instrumental role in supporting the economy," said Mr. Huang. "The eased capital charges do not make it easier for developers to borrow from banks, but it does reduce some burden for banks as they charge lower interest rates on homebuyers seeking a mortgage."
We believe the changes will be generally favorable to Chinese banks. Those lenders with prudent underwriting standards and lower LTVs will likely enjoy incremental capital savings.
The new rules also loosen the capital charges on certain equity holdings in nonfinancial corporates to 250% from 400%. Some of the holdings are policy-oriented or associated with resolving asset risks (such as debt-to-equity swaps).
The new rules raise charges on subordinated claims of financial institutions to 150%, in line with Basel 3 requirements. But officials maintained the regulatory risk weighting for the subordinated debt of policy banks at 100%.
"The risk weighting supports policy banks' fundraising to facilitate government initiatives, while still meeting the regulators' aim to reduce contagion risk among commercial banks," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Ming Tan.
A BIT OF BUFFER FOR TLAC
We assume that China's global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) need to raise Chinese renminbi (RMB) 2.4 trillion in total loss-absorbing capital (TLAC) before January 2025, to satisfy regulatory requirements. China's G-SIBs are Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp., Agricultural Bank of China Ltd., and Bank of China Ltd. The lenders are also known as China's 'Big Four' banks.
A combination of proactive issuance of regulatory capital instruments and a pivot to less capital-intensive exposure could help the G-SIBs bridge their TLAC gaps.
We nonetheless expect the TLAC capital gap to grow, mainly driven by Chinese G-SIBs' fast risk-weighted asset (RWA) growth and weak profitability amid a lackluster economic recovery.
But the new capital rules help reduce RWA growth by lowering risk weightings. The new rules also allow incremental capital savings under the internal rating-based approach, under which the RWA output floor will be lowered to 72.5% of RWA versus 80% under the standardized approach.
We test the TLAC funding pressure in different scenarios and focus on the annual RWA growth rate and return on average assets (ROAA) of the Chinese G-SIBs.
|TLAC gap sensitivity analysis|
|Big Four banks' combined TLAC gap (Tril. RMB)* for different ROAA and RWA scenarios|
|Average annual RWA growth rate§|
|*TLAC gap refers to the volume of TLAC capital these banks need to raise by January 2025. §Average for 2023 and 2024. RWA--Risk-weighted assets. ROAA--Return on average assets. RMB--Renminbi. Source: S&P Global Ratings.|
We expect the major banks to expedite the issuance of TLAC-eligible instruments to plug their funding gap, as TLAC implementation begins in about a year. Senior nonpreferred debt could play an increasing role in TLAC conformance for Chinse G-SIBs, given their cheaper funding costs. It is also a likely substitute for some mature senior unsecured debt without adding much to debt leverage.
Traditional Tier-2 and additional Tier-1 (AT1) instruments will continue to be key to replenishing immediate shortfalls. The Big Four banks collectively have unused Tier-2 and AT1 quota of about RMB1 trillion as of end-September 2023, by our estimates.
The regulators allow a two-year phase-in period for Chinese banks to beef up their reserves for nonloan exposure, and a five-year period for pillar three disclosure (a framework that promotes market discipline and transparency via public disclosure) when the rules become effective on Jan. 1, 2024.
Editor: Jasper Moiseiwitsch
- Credit FAQ: Asia-Pacific Bank Hybrids Bounce Back In The Wake Of Credit Suisse, Sept. 28, 2023
- China's Tightening Capital Rules To Hit Aggressive Banks, Feb. 22, 2023
- China's Major Banks Still Have An RMB3.7 Trillion Shortfall On TLAC Requirement, Jan. 18, 2023
This report does not constitute a rating action.
The report is available to RatingsDirect subscribers at www.capitaliq.com. If you are not a RatingsDirect subscriber, you may purchase a copy of the report by sending an e-mail to email@example.com. Ratings information can also be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website by using the Ratings search box at www.spglobal.com/ratings.
|Primary Credit Analysts:||Michael Huang, Hong Kong + 852 25333541;|
|Ming Tan, CFA, Singapore + 65 6216 1095;|
|Secondary Contact:||Ryan Tsang, CFA, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3532;|
|Research Assistant:||Birao Fan, HANGZHOU|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.