articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230522-european-and-u-k-credit-card-abs-index-report-q1-2023-12725992 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

European And U.K. Credit Card ABS Index Report Q1 2023

NEWS

LNR Partners LLC STRONG Commercial Mortgage Loan Special Servicer Ranking Affirmed; Ranking Outlook Stable

COMMENTS

Weekly European CLO Update

COMMENTS

China Securitization: Auto ABS And RMBS Tracker April 2023

COMMENTS

Prime Assets Will Help Shield Australia's Office REITs From Rising Stress


European And U.K. Credit Card ABS Index Report Q1 2023

Table 1

Key performance indicators: U.K.
Index (%) Q1 2023 Q4 2022 Q3 2022 Q2 2022 Q1 2022
Total delinquency rate* 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5
Charge-off rate* 2.9 3.0 2.9 3.1 3.1
Payment rate* 32.9 32.6 33.1 32.3 30.8
Yield rate* 15.6 15.7 15.1 14.5 15.0
Net spread* 12.7 12.7 12.3 11.4 11.8
Economic data
Unemployment rate (%)§ 3.8 3.6 3.7 3.8 4.0
Individual insolvencies§ 27,432 29,352 28,946 32,305 27,668
Y-O-Y GDP growth§ N.A. 2.4 2.9 8.7 6.6
*The quarterly performance data reflects the three-month average performance during the quarter, rather than the value as of quarter-end. For example, the data for first quarter reflects the average performance for January, February, and March, rather than the value for March alone. §Office for National Statistics, England, and Wales, not seasonally adjusted. Y-O-Y--Year on year. N.A.--Not available. Source: S&P Global Ratings.

Table 2

Key performance indicators: Continental Europe
Index (%) Q1 2023 Q4 2022 Q3 2022 Q2 2022 Q1 2022
Total delinquency rate* 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7
Charge-off rate* 1.3 2.1 1.4 0.9 2.7
Payment rate* 26.5 25.2 25.4 26.7 26.6
Yield rate* 16.9 16.5 16.8 16.9 16.8
Net spread* 15.6 14.8 15.5 16.1 14.1
Unemployment rate (%)
France§ 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.1 7.5
Spain§ 13.3 12.9 12.7 12.5 13.7
Switzerland† 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.4
Y-O-Y GDP growth
France§ 0.8 0.4 1.0 4.2 4.7
Spain§ 3.8 2.9 4.4 6.8 6.7
Switzerland† N/A 0.5 0.5 3.7 3.8
*The quarterly performance data reflects the three-month average performance during the quarter, rather than the value as of quarter-end. For example, the data for first quarter reflects the average performance for January, February, and March, rather than the value for March alone. Y-O-Y--Year on year. N/A--Not applicable. Sources: §ECB/Eurostat, †State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO), as of Jan. 30. S&P Global Ratings.

Table 3

Scenarios for U.K. and European credit card ABS collateral
Actual Forecast
2022 2023f 2024f 2025f 2026f Baseline effect on collateral credit quality
Real GDP (%) change
U.K. 4.0 (0.5) 1.5 1.8 1.6 Somewhat unfavorable
France 2.6 0.4 1.2 1.6 1.4 Neutral
Spain 5.5 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.2 Somewhat favorable
Switzerland 2.1 0.6 1.2 1.7 1.2 Somewhat favorable
Unemployment rate (%)
U.K. 3.7 4.3 4.5 4.2 4.0 Somewhat unfavorable
France 7.3 7.6 7.9 7.9 7.6 Somewhat unfavorable
Spain 12.9 13.0 13.2 12.9 12.7 Somewhat unfavorable
Switzerland 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.0 4.0 Neutral
U.K. CPI inflation (%) 9.1 5.8 1.4 1.1 1.7 Unfavorable
Bank of England policy rate Q4 average (%) 3.25 4.25 2.86 2.50 2.50 Unfavorable
ECB policy rate Q4 average (%) 2.51 4.00 3.50 2.50 2.50 Unfavorable
Swiss National Bank policy rate Q4 average (%) 1.04 1.75 1.25 1.00 1.0 Somewhat unfavorable
CPI--Consumer price index. f--Forecast. Sources: Oxford Economics, S&P Global Ratings.

U.K. ABS Credit Card Focus

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Table 4

Issuers versus the index - March 2023
Outstanding amounts (mil. £) Trust as percentage of U.K. index (%) Yield rate (%) Payment rate (%) Charge-off rate (%) Total delinquency rate (%)
U.K. index 19,552 16.4 35.5 3.0 1.4
Delamare 3,098 15.8 12.3 53.5 1.9 2.5
Gracechurch 8,851 45.3 16.2 30.7 3.1 1.0
Penarth 7,092 36.3 17.4 35.1 2.3 1.2
Oban Cards 511 2.6 29.7 15.4 15.4 4.7

Table 5

Performance against base-case assumptions
Charge-off rate (%) Yield rate (%) Payment rate (%)
Trust 12-month average Three-month average Base case* 12-month average Three-month average Base case* 12-month average Three-month average Base case*
Delamare 2.0 1.9 6.0 11.4 11.5 8.0 47.0 48.5 25.0
Gracechurch 3.3 3.1 7.5 16.0 15.9 13.5 29.1 29.5 15.0
Penarth 2.2 2.3 6.5 14.8 15.7 13.5 32.2 32.1 17.0
Oban Cards 13.0 13.0 20.0 31.0 32.7 32.0 14.8 14.5 12.0
*In our analysis, we subject base case rates to stresses, haircuts, and lagging. For the yield rate, these values cannot be directly compared with our base-case assumptions because they include interchange, which we do not give credit for in our analysis.

Chart 3

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

Chart 6

Chart 7

image

Chart 8

image

Continental Europe ABS Credit Card Focus

Chart 9

image

Chart 10

image

Table 6

Issuers versus the index - March 2023
Trust Outstanding amount (mil. €) Trust as percentage of index (%) Yield rate (%) Payment rate (%) Charge-off rate (%) Total delinquency rate (%)
EMEA Index 3,247.1 16.9 26.5 1.3 2.2
Gingko 733.3 22.6 8.2 5.6 2.9 3.1
MCCP 419.0 12.9 13.5 5.5 0.7 0.3
Columbus 627.2 19.3 17.3 6.5 1.1 2.7
Oneycord 731.6 22.5 13.8 8.7 1.6 2.9
Swiss Cards 736.0 22.7 30.5 94.1 0.1 1.2

Table 7

Performance against base-case assumptions
Charge-off rate (%) Yield rate (%) Payment rate (%)
Trust 12-month average Three-month average Base case* 12-month average Three-month average Base case* 12-month average Three-month average Base case*
Columbus 3.6 2.6 10.0 18.4 17.9 18.5 7.1 6.5 4.4
Ginkgo 2.9 2.8 7.8 7.9 8.1 7.8 6.4 5.3 2.0
MCCP 0.8 0.6 7.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 5.9 5.5 2.0
Oneycord 1.7 1.4 9.0 13.4 13.5 13.5 8.5 8.5 8.0
Swiss Cards 0.1 0.1 3.5 27.8 27.6 8.0 83.4 82.0 32.0
*In our analysis, we subject base-case rates to stresses, haircuts, and lagging.

Chart 11

>

Chart 12

image

Chart 13

Chart 14

Chart 15

image

Chart 16

image

Summary Of Methodology For Our European And U.K. Credit Card ABS Index

What is included in the U.K. and European ABS credit card index?

Unlike our auto and RMBS indexes, we include a transaction as of its closing date. This is because we do not expect a transaction's performance to change materially, due to the short-term nature of the receivables. As the index is current balance weighted, and the transactions are revolving master trusts, the transactions do not change as of closing. We have differentiated between European and U.K. transactions due to their different regulatory regimes, currency denominations, and other characteristics.

What is the data source?

Data is compiled from investor reports and as such is based on each deal's definition of arrears and default.

Is it loan count or "dollar" weighted index?

The index is calculated as the current balance of receivables in each arrear's status (as reported in investor reports), divided by each transaction's current balance (as reported in investor reports). Non-euro denominated transactions are converted to euro.

When a transaction redeems how does it affect the index? Does it affect the past quarter(s)?

When a transaction redeems, it does not contribute to the index beyond that point. It has no effect on reported values for previous quarters.

When do we cut off the index for a given quarter?

The cut off is based on the period covered in investor reports. For example, if the index is up to Q4 2021, only collateral data until Dec. 31, 2021 is included.

Why do prior quarter's numbers sometimes change?

There are two main reasons:

  • The servicer/party providing the investor report can amend data.
  • Newer data for the most recent quarter is available.

Glossary

Delinquency rate

Delinquency data are a leading indicator for the underlying proportion of accounts that roll through the delinquency categories before the debt is charged off. A high proportion of 90+ day delinquencies will typically roll through to charge-off within three months, and so delinquencies, and especially 90+ day delinquencies, are a good indicator of how the charge-off index might perform.

Charge-off rate

We define charge-offs as losses on principal receivables divided by the pool balance at the beginning of the month, which is annualized and expressed as a percentage. They are effectively gross losses.

Payment rate

We define the payment rate as the total collections received in a particular month divided by the pool balance at the beginning of the month, expressed as a percentage. In our view, a high payment rate benefits the transaction as during the amortization period the note principal is paid down faster, meaning noteholders are exposed to losses for a shorter period.

Yield rate

We define yield as finance charge and fee income in a particular month divided by the pool balance at the beginning of the month, annualized and expressed as a percentage. We believe high-yield is beneficial for the transaction, as it means a higher income to offset any losses and pay the interest on the notes.

Net spread

We define net spread as three-month average yield rate minus three-month average charge-off rate.

Related Criteria And Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst: Philip Bane, Dublin + 353 1 568 0623;
philip.bane@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts: Doug Paterson, London + 44 20 7176 5521;
doug.paterson@spglobal.com
Matthew S Mitchell, CFA, Paris +33 (0)6 17 23 72 88;
matthew.mitchell@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.


Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back