- The emerging markets (EMs) that will benefit the most from China's lifting of COVID-19 restrictions are those that are exposed to China's consumption, especially tourism-related. These are mostly EMs in Asia, and include Thailand and Vietnam.
- Private consumption activity is likely to pose a stronger recovery than infrastructure and real estate. The recent increase in industrial metals prices will improve terms of trade dynamics in South Africa, Brazil, Chile, and Peru. However, benefits to growth in those EMS will not materialize until China's property market recovers more decisively.
- Supply chain disruptions have eased significantly, and the loosening in mobility restrictions in China could further benefit EMs with significant linkages with China in manufacturing--mostly EMs in Asia, but also Mexico.
- There could be some inflationary pressure from China's reopening as demand comes back online, but weakening global demand will temper inflation.
China has begun the rapid relaxation of zero COVID-19 policy. In our view, emerging markets (EMs) that are exposed to China's consumption will benefit the most from this policy shift. In particular, EMs that are large recipients of Chinese tourists could benefit significantly as travel picks up after a couple years of virtually no outbound Chinese tourism. These include Thailand, and Vietnam.
We expect consumption activity to recover more strongly than investment because real estate fixed investment isn't on a firm recovery path. EMs that typically benefit from greater demand for infrastructure-heavy industrial metals, such as South Africa, Brazil, Chile, and Peru, may see terms of trade improvements if the recent increase in commodity prices is sustained. However, the benefits to growth in those EMs will not materialize until China's property market recovers more decisively and results in greater export volumes of metals, or prices remain high for a sustained period to fuel income growth.
Greater mobility in China reduces the risk of port or manufacturing disruptions, which could be positive for EMs with significant manufacturing linkages with China. However, weakening demand in advanced economies, they key buyers of manufactured goods, is likely to prevent those benefits from fully materializing.
Growth Drivers In China As It Reopens
China's exit from its stringent COVID-19 strategy toward the end of last year will be a key driver of stronger GDP growth in 2023. We currently forecast 4.8% growth in China this year, compared with 3% in 2022 (see "China’s Earlier Policy Shift Advances Its Recovery," Jan. 18, 2023). Two opposing COVID-19-related drivers are at play: improved social mobility and business activity, and reduced workforce productivity (due to illness or mortality). Our current base case assumes the former driver will have a bigger impact than the latter in 2023 (see "China’s COVID Wave: Q1 2023 Will Be Critical," published on Dec. 21, 2022).
In our view, consumption will lead the recovery, with investment more muted. That said, signs suggest policymakers have started to focus more on supporting investment in real estate, including a major easing of restrictions on bank lending to property developers, among other signs. This could lead to a more notable pickup in investment in infrastructure later in the year.
What This Means For Chinese And Asian Corporates
We do not expect the Chinese government to back-track on its COVID-19 easing. Officials have given no such indications, and the boom in passenger volumes and cinema ticket sales, among other reporting during the Lunar New Year, suggest fears of infection have been receding over past weeks. Meanwhile, the government, at the highest level of the State Council, has emphasized the need to support growth.
Sustained reopening will help China's GDP growth reach our base case of 4.8% in 2023 and may allow some businesses to recover faster than we previously expected. Sectors that stand to benefit first are those more reliant on consumption and mobility. For example, we expect China's retail sales growth to reach 5.8% this year, and we have revised up our mass gross-gaming revenue forecasts for Macao on the back of the reopening.
Infrastructure and real estate, however, may take longer to recover. COVID-19 lockdowns have obstructed the deployment of government stimulus and compounded the country's property crisis. The latest reporting continues to show synchronized declines in overall fixed asset investments and real estate fixed asset investment. Reversing those trends will be challenging. Homebuyers remain cautious, leading us to expect home sales to decline another 5%-8% this year, after falling in 2022. Local governments also remain under fiscal strain, squeezed by rising outlays for COVID-19 and stimulus and declining revenues from land sales, a key part of their income.
For Asia, the above implies that travel and consumption are likely to be the main transmission channels for the China reopening impetus. Tourism and export sectors from Thailand to Korea are already pinning hopes of a boost to recovery this year from Chinese tourists and consumers. Upstream oil and gas, and mining sectors in China as well as across Asia may also benefit if the reopening continues to push up energy and commodity prices. This leaves capital goods, real estate, and domestic services with delayed or less direct benefits, and thermal power and downstream energy and metals sectors with risks of cost and margin pressures.
EMs With High Exposure To Chinese Outbound Tourism Will Benefit The Most
One of the most noticeable impact on EMs from China's reopening will likely be the resumption of outbound tourism. Several EMs, mostly in Asia, traditionally have benefited from a large share of tourists coming from China--a trend that came to halt during the pandemic (see chart 1), with large negative repercussions to GDP growth in those countries. In the case of Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines, at least 1 in every 5 tourist arrivals came from China before he pandemic. In the case, of Indonesia, and Malaysia, it was at least on in every 10.
The resumption of Chinese outbound travel into these countries will likely have a large impact on their economies, especially in EMs where inbound tourism is a relatively large share of GDP. In Thailand and Vietnam, for example, tourism exports where roughly 10% of GDP before the pandemic (see chart 2). The speed in the recovery of tourism in those EMs will be subject to potential COVID-19-related travel restrictions imposed by those governments on Chinese arrivals. However, any such measures imposed are likely to be temporary, and tourism flows are likely to recover as the year progresses.
EMs Exposed To Chinese Investment In Infrastructure May Take Longer To Benefit
The evolution of Chinese investment in infrastructure as its economy reopens will be key to several EMs that supply infrastructure-related industrial metals, such as Chile, Peru, Brazil, and South Africa. Chile stands out, with copper exports representing over 15% of GDP in 2021 and about two-thirds of those going to China. Peru is also one the largest exporters of copper to China (roughly 6% of GDP). Brazil and South Africa export significant volumes of iron ore to China and could also benefit from higher Chinese investment in infrastructure.
The initial reaction of metal prices to the relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions has been positive. Iron ore prices are up over 50% since early November 2022 (when the initial signs of a policy shift in China came to light), and copper prices are up roughly 20% since then. Higher prices certainly help EM exporters of industrial nominally, by improving trade balances, and often benefit fiscal accounts through taxes/royalties on mining sectors. Tight copper supply in key producers, such as in Chile where output has been declining and in Peru where political instability has disrupted production, could add upward pressure on prices if those issues are not resolved.
Unless high metals prices remain for a prolonged period and fuel higher income growth, the impact on real GDP growth will take hold once volumes, and not just prices of metals, increase. For example, in 2019, iron ore prices were up on average by nearly 45%, yet iron ore output declined in both Brazil and South Africa that year. Therefore, for EM metals exporters to see growth benefits from the reopening in China, a more decisive improvement in its property sector may be needed--that significantly increases demand for metals.
The outlook for the Chinese property sector remains subject to a lot of uncertainty, following a series of defaults of major developers last year, as well as a recent decline in prices of real estate. While we don't expect a sharp rebound in real estate activity, a barrage of recent government support measures should slow the downturn.
Weakening Global Demand Will Dampen A Potential Improvement In Manufacturing…
The loosening in mobility restrictions in China could also eventually ease any remaining supply-chain disruptions, potentially benefiting EMs with significant manufacturing linkages with China. However, initially some disruption to production could take place as large numbers of people become temporarily ill after catching the virus. Beyond that, once manufacturing production normalizes, it will likely be muted by expected weakness in global demand--unless the outlook for the main advanced economies brightens.
EMs in Asia are have the largest linkages with China's manufacturing sector (see table 3). In addition, supply-chain linkages tend to be high in the computer and electronics sector. Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, and the Philippines have sectors with large supply-chain linkages with China that represent a higher share of their economy (see table 4). Outside of EM Asia, Mexico stands out, with about a fifth of value added in its computer and electronics sector coming from Chinese inputs.
In EMs with higher supply-chain linkages with China (Vietnam, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, and Mexico), in most cases manufacturing output is well above pre-pandemic levels (see chart 3). The main laggard is Thailand, where manufacturing output is still 3.5% below its level at the end of 2019. Among the worst-performing manufacturing segments in Thailand is the computer and electronics sector, which is still 13% below its pre-pandemic level.
…And Offset Inflationary Pressure From China's Reopening
As EM authorities continue implementing measures to re-anchor inflation expectations by tightening monetary policy, some fear that the reopening of China's economy could threaten to set back those disinflationary efforts. Reopening China's economy will certainly have an impact on price pressures domestically and globally, given its size and role in manufacturing and commodity markets. Prices for energy and industrial metals have already begun to rise. Brent prices have risen 10% since mid-December, and S&P Global's GSCI Industrial Metals index is up more than 9% in the same period. Our sense is that higher commodity prices from earlier and speedier abandonment of stringent COVID-19 policies in China will slow expected disinflation in 2023 only marginally--not enough to shift the stance among central banks in EMs, which is to pause or even begin cutting this year.
On the demand side, the impact of Chinese consumers releasing pent up demand may be gradual. Domestically, most goods markets in China face oversupply. Moreover, the overhang of "excess saving," while significant, is substantially smaller in China than in the U.S. and Europe, mainly because the government has largely abstained from providing fiscal support to households during the COVID-19 period. Price gains in China will more likely be centered on contact-based services that were affected the most by mobility restrictions, and these will have a limited spillover effect on the rest of the world. As a result, the demand-side impact of the Chinese reopening on EM inflation is likely to be relatively small, and will be muted by weakening demand in most of the rest of the world.
Supply-side dynamics that have been the main driver of inflation in EMs (food and energy) since the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022 will remain a major swing factor. In our late November economic outlook, we penciled in Brent prices to average $85 per barrel in 2023 (versus $101 in 2022); even if Brent prices were to revert to $100, the impact would be relatively modest. Such an upward revision to our oil forecast implies that compared to what we had previously expected, EM fuel inflation would be on aggregate 2.5 percentage points (ppts) higher--and headline EM inflation 0.3 ppts higher--all else equal.
Furthermore, to the extent that China's reopening increases commodities prices further, these would improve terms of trade of several EMs and potentially lead their currencies to appreciate at the margin, relieving inflationary pressure. Most EM currencies have appreciated against the U.S. dollar in recent months, and a terms of trade improvement could further this trend.
The Impact On Financing Conditions
China's reopening has increased risk appetite for investors, and EMs have seen an uptick in portfolio inflows over the past few weeks. Overall, these factors have been supportive for financing conditions, which have also improved over the past few weeks for other factors, including less pessimism toward growth in Europe and the U.S. amid better-than-expected economic data. However, challenges persist. While EM speculative-grade issuers have been able to tap the market, this has come at considerably higher interest rates than in recent years (see chart 7); reflecting expectations that tight monetary conditions will remain in place for a prolonged period.
We expect financing conditions will remain volatile over the first half of 2023 as investors assess the path of U.S. interest rates and inflation. More signs of easing inflation could fuel more optimism because it could temper expectations for additional tightening by the U.S. Federal Reserve, and point toward the end of its rate-hiking cycle. Such conditions could also continue to support EM currencies against the dollar. Consequently, a "cheaper dollar" would reduce inflationary pressures for EMs, potentially increasing investor appetite for EM assets. Conversely, higher-than-expected inflationary pressures in the U.S. would likely have to opposite effect, increasing expectations for more tightening by the Fed. This could tighten financing conditions and weaken EM currencies.
In our view, the recent improvement in financing conditions triggered by China's reopening could be short-lived if other factors weaken investor sentiment. In particular, those that keep the Fed on a tighter monetary policy stance for longer, such as higher-than-expected inflation and renewed pessimism toward global growth, could pare back the recent improvement in financing conditions.
The views expressed here are the independent opinions of S&P Global's economics group, which is separate from, but provides forecasts and other input to, S&P Global Ratings' analysts. The economic views herein may be incorporated into S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings; however, credit ratings are determined and assigned by ratings committees, exercising analytical judgment in accordance with S&P Global Ratings' publicly available methodologies.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
|Primary Contact:||Elijah Oliveros-Rosen, New York + 1 (212) 438 2228;|
|Secondary Contacts:||Vishrut Rana, Singapore + 65 6216 1008;|
|Satyam Panday, San Francisco + 1 (212) 438 6009;|
|Jose M Perez-Gorozpe, Madrid +34 914233212;|
|Charles Chang, Hong Kong (852) 2533-3543;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.