articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/221028-u-s-local-governments-credit-brief-massachusetts-municipalities-means-and-medians-12540608 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Local Governments Credit Brief: Massachusetts Municipalities Means And Medians

COMMENTS

Cyber Risk Insights: Recession Pressures Could Expose More U.S. Public Finance Issuers To Cyber Attacks

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Credit Rating Models

COMMENTS

Charter School Brief: Tennessee

COMMENTS

U.S. Public Sector Cyber Risk Is Mainstream Now, Says Seminar


U.S. Local Governments Credit Brief: Massachusetts Municipalities Means And Medians

Overview

Massachusetts municipalities (or local governments [LGs]) maintained generally stable credit quality through the pandemic and recession. S&P Global Ratings expects continued stability in the near term, despite macro-level economic pressures. Projected stability is supported by high economic metrics relative to national peers, Massachusetts LGs' high reliance on property taxes, and a stable state-aid environment. Debt-funded infrastructure needs and underfunded retirement liabilities could pressure credit quality over the long term if local governments are unable to balance competing priorities within financial and political constraints.

S&P Global Ratings maintains ratings on 235 Massachusetts municipalities. Since November 2021, there were 13 total rating actions affecting 11 LGs, with one negative rating action and 12 positive actions on the LGs' respective general obligation (GO) bonds. Currently, 99% of the 235 Massachusetts LG GO ratings have a stable outlook, two LGs have a negative outlook, and none on positive.

Credit Fundamentals
  • Stable operating environment, with generally predictable revenues and expenditures and stable state aid
  • Most rated municipalities participate in a broad and diverse metropolitan statistical area (MSA)
  • More than 70% of Massachusetts municipalities have good or strong management as assessed by our FMA
Potential Challenges
  • For many municipalities, pension and other postemployment benefit (OPEB) liabilities and costs are generally increasing and funding discipline varies. These costs could increasingly pressure budgets if they grow faster than overall budgets
  • Environmental risks may be elevated, particularly along the coast, on Cape Cod and the Islands. Managements will play an increasingly important role in addressing potential environmental risk to municipal operations and the tax base
  • While the state's property tax limitation is embedded in our analysis and we do not make a distinction between municipalities' unlimited- and limited-tax pledges, growing fixed costs and capital needs could pressure managements' abilities to balance competing expenditure priorities below the levy cap

What We are Watching in 2021 and Beyond

image

Very few Massachusetts LGs faced material financial pressure during the pandemic and resulting recession. State aid and local property taxes, which represent the predominant revenue sources for LGs, were stable. LGs demonstrated an ability to cut expenditures, primarily through not filling vacant positions, energy and other savings due to closures stemming from pandemic gathering restrictions, postponing nonurgent capital projects, and cutting ancillary services such as recreational programming.

Unemployment rates spiked across the state, particularly in areas with significant service-related employment. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Barnstable County (10.8%), Bristol County (10.8%), Essex County (10.4%), Hampden County (11.0%), Nantucket County (11.1%), Plymouth County (10.0%), and Suffolk County (10.3%) were all elevated at more than 10% in 2020, with several other counties approaching 10%. However, the high unemployment rates did not translate to material financial pressure for LGs, and unemployment rates across the state have fallen to levels comparable with the rest of the country.

Spotlight On Environment, Social, Governance

image

According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Massachusetts has more than 1,500 miles of coastline. The state's economic and population center in Boston, along with significant population and regional economic centers along and near the coastline, results in heightened environmental physical risk from storms, flooding, and sea-level rise. Its Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) program assists municipalities in planning for and addressing these risks. However, municipalities are likely to face increasing budgetary pressure from implementing resiliency efforts and funding capital infrastructure projects to support adaptation measures.

Although Massachusetts has generally stable population trends and demographics, outside of the Boston MSA, municipalities could face pressure from declining or aging populations. Furthermore, although property tax rates are lower than in surrounding states, which helps keep housing costs more affordable, home prices are high in and around Boston, which could lead to some social capital risks for residents. The state has a demonstrated history of intervening to support financially distressed municipalities, which can help stabilize local government credit quality, but it is less formalized than in neighboring Connecticut and Rhode Island. Additionally, given somewhat poor pension plan governance at the local level, our view of an individual municipality's risk management, culture, and oversight governance risks could vary based on how local governments incorporate forward-looking planning and projections of pension and OPEBs into their operations. Our view of governance will vary by individual local government based on its unique circumstances.

Massachusetts Local Government Data

Table 1

Massachusetts Municipalities: Medians
Rating
AAA AA+ AA AA- A+ A
Projected per capita EBI (%) 175 129 112 81 76 76
Market value per capita ($) 263,404 173,782 139,130 94,700 83,195 68,812
Available general fund (%) 21 20 15 13 15 5
General fund performance (%) 2.2 3.3 2.0 2.9 3.4 4.0
Cash and expense (%) 40 41 42 35 33 18
Carrying charge (%) 4.4 3.5 3.7 3.4 1.6 2.4
Pension ARC + OPEB as % expense 6.6 6.7 7.7 8.7 9.1 10.1
EBI--Effective buying income. ARC--Annual required contribution. OPEB--Other postemployment benefits.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Table 2

Massachusetts Municipalities Unlimited-Tax General Obligation: Ratings List
As of Sept. 19, 2022. This list was prepared by individuals on behalf of the USPF Group of S&P Global Ratings and is current as of September 19, 2022. For the most up to date, accurate, and complete information on any credit ratings referenced in this list, please visit www.standardandpoors.com.
General obligation
Organization Rating Outlook
Abington AA STABLE
Acton Twn AAA STABLE
Acushnet Twn AA+ STABLE
Adams Twn AA- STABLE
Agawam AA+ STABLE
Amesbury AA STABLE
Amherst AA+ STABLE
Andover AAA STABLE
Arlington AAA STABLE
Ashland AAA STABLE
Athol Twn AA- STABLE
Attleboro AA STABLE
Auburn AA+ STABLE
Avon Twn AA+ STABLE
Ayer Twn AA+ STABLE
Barnstable AAA STABLE
Bedford Twn AAA STABLE
Belchertown AA STABLE
Bellingham Twn AA+ STABLE
Belmont Twn AAA STABLE
Berlin Twn AA+ STABLE
Beverly AA+ STABLE
Billerica Twn AA+ STABLE
Blackstone Twn AA+ STABLE
Bolton Twn AAA STABLE
Boston AAA STABLE
Bourne Twn AA+ STABLE
Boxborough Twn AAA STABLE
Boxford AAA STABLE
Braintree AA NEGATIVE
Brewster Twn AAA STABLE
Brimfield Twn AA+ STABLE
Brockton AA- STABLE
Brookline AAA STABLE
Buckland AA STABLE
Burlington AAA STABLE
Cambridge AAA STABLE
Canton Twn AAA STABLE
Carver Twn AA STABLE
Charlton Twn AA+ STABLE
Chatham AAA STABLE
Chelmsford Twn AA+ STABLE
Chelsea AA STABLE
Cheshire Twn AA- STABLE
Chicopee AA- STABLE
Chilmark Town AAA STABLE
City of Watertown AAA STABLE
Clinton Twn AA+ STABLE
Cohasset Town AAA STABLE
Danvers Twn AAA STABLE
Dartmouth AAA STABLE
Dedham AAA STABLE
Dennis AAA STABLE
Dracut Town AA STABLE
Dudley Twn AA STABLE
Duxbury Twn AAA STABLE
East Bridgewater AA STABLE
East Longmeadow Twn AA+ STABLE
Eastham AA+ STABLE
Easthampton AA+ STABLE
Erving Twn AA STABLE
Essex AA+ STABLE
Everett AA+ STABLE
Fairhaven Twn AA+ STABLE
Falmouth Twn AAA STABLE
Fitchburg A+ STABLE
Foxborough Twn AAA STABLE
Framingham AA STABLE
Franklin Twn AAA STABLE
Freetown AA+ STABLE
Gardner AA- STABLE
Gloucester AA STABLE
Grafton Twn AA+ STABLE
Granby AA STABLE
Great Barrington AAA STABLE
Greenfield AA- STABLE
Groton Twn AAA STABLE
Hadley AAA STABLE
Halifax Twn AA+ STABLE
Hamilton Twn AAA STABLE
Hampden Twn AA+ STABLE
Harvard Twn AAA STABLE
Harwich AAA STABLE
Hatfield AA STABLE
Haverhill AA STABLE
Hingham Twn AAA STABLE
Holden AA+ STABLE
Holliston AAA STABLE
Holyoke A+ STABLE
Hopkinton Twn AAA STABLE
Hubbardston Twn AA+ STABLE
Hudson Twn AA STABLE
Hull AA STABLE
Ipswich Twn AAA STABLE
Lakeville AA+ STABLE
Lawrence A+ STABLE
Lee Twn AA STABLE
Leicester Twn AA+ STABLE
Lenox AAA STABLE
Leominster AA STABLE
Leverett Twn AA STABLE
Lexington Twn AAA STABLE
Lincoln Twn AAA STABLE
Littleton AAA STABLE
Longmeadow Twn AA+ STABLE
Lowell AA- STABLE
Lunenburg AA+ STABLE
Lynn A+ STABLE
Lynnfield AA+ STABLE
Malden AA STABLE
Manchester-By-The-Sea AAA STABLE
Mansfield AA+ STABLE
Marblehead Twn AAA STABLE
Marion Twn AAA STABLE
Marlborough AAA STABLE
Marshfield Twn AA+ STABLE
Mashpee Twn AAA STABLE
Mattapoisett AAA STABLE
Medford AA+ STABLE
Medway AAA STABLE
Melrose AA+ STABLE
Mendon AA+ STABLE
Merrimac AA+ STABLE
Methuen AA- STABLE
Middleborough Twn AA STABLE
Middleton AA+ STABLE
Millbury Twn AA STABLE
Milton AAA STABLE
Monson Town AA STABLE
Montague Twn AA STABLE
Nantucket Twn AA+ STABLE
Natick AAA STABLE
Needham AAA STABLE
New Bedford AA- STABLE
Newbury AAA STABLE
Newburyport AAA STABLE
Newton AAA STABLE
Norfolk Twn AA+ STABLE
North Adams A STABLE
North Andover AAA STABLE
North Attleborough AA+ STABLE
North Brookfield Twn AA- STABLE
Northampton AAA STABLE
Northbridge Twn AA+ STABLE
Norton Twn AA+ STABLE
Norwell Twn AAA STABLE
Norwood AA+ STABLE
Oak Bluffs AA+ STABLE
Orange Twn A+ STABLE
Orleans Twn AAA STABLE
Otis AA STABLE
Pelham Twn AA+ STABLE
Pembroke Twn AA STABLE
Petersham Twn AA+ STABLE
Pittsfield A+ STABLE
Plympton AA+ STABLE
Provincetown AA+ STABLE
Quincy AA STABLE
Randolph Twn AA STABLE
Raynham AA+ STABLE
Reading AAA STABLE
Revere AA STABLE
Richmond AA+ STABLE
Rochester AA+ STABLE
Rockland Twn AA STABLE
Rockport Twn AA+ STABLE
Rowley Twn AA+ STABLE
Rutland Twn AA STABLE
Salem AA STABLE
Salisbury AA STABLE
Sandwich Twn AA+ STABLE
Saugus AA+ STABLE
Scituate Twn AA+ STABLE
Seekonk Twn AA+ STABLE
Sherborn AAA STABLE
Shirley Twn AA STABLE
Shrewsbury AAA STABLE
Somerville AA+ STABLE
Southampton Twn AA- STABLE
Southborough AAA STABLE
Southbridge Twn AA- STABLE
Springfield AA- NEGATIVE
Stockbridge Twn AA+ STABLE
Stoneham AA+ STABLE
Stoughton AA STABLE
Stow Twn AAA STABLE
Sturbridge Town AA+ STABLE
Sudbury AAA STABLE
Sutton Twn AA+ STABLE
Swampscott AA+ STABLE
Swansea Twn AA+ STABLE
Taunton AA STABLE
Tewksbury Twn AA+ STABLE
Tisbury AA+ STABLE
Topsfield AAA STABLE
Town of Holbrook AA- STABLE
Town of Kingston AA+ STABLE
Town of Ludlow AA- STABLE
Town of Plymouth AA+ STABLE
Town of Sharon AA STABLE
Town of Upton AA+ STABLE
Truro Twn AA+ STABLE
Twn of Groveland AA+ STABLE
Tyngsborough AA+ STABLE
Uxbridge Twn AA STABLE
Wakefield Twn AAA STABLE
Walpole AA+ STABLE
Waltham AA+ STABLE
Ware AA STABLE
Wareham AA+ STABLE
Wellfleet AAA STABLE
Wenham Twn AAA STABLE
West Boylston Twn AA+ STABLE
West Bridgewater AA+ STABLE
West Newbury AAA STABLE
West Springfield AA STABLE
West Tisbury Twn AA+ STABLE
Westborough Twn AAA STABLE
Westfield AA STABLE
Westford Twn AAA STABLE
Westhampton AA+ STABLE
Westminster AA+ STABLE
Weston AAA STABLE
Westwood AAA STABLE
Weymouth AA STABLE
Wilbraham AA+ STABLE
Williamsburg Twn AA+ STABLE
Wilmington AA+ STABLE
Winchendon A+ STABLE
Winchester AAA STABLE
Winthrop AA STABLE
Woburn AAA STABLE
Worcester AA- STABLE
Wrentham Twn AA+ STABLE
Yarmouth AA+ STABLE

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Christian Richards, Washington D.C. + 1 (617) 530 8325;
christian.richards@spglobal.com
Anthony Polanco, Manchester + 1 (617) 530 8234;
anthony.polanco@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Charlene P Butterfield, New York + 1 (212) 438 2741;
charlene.butterfield@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Akash J Pandey, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.


Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back