Overview
Massachusetts municipalities (or local governments [LGs]) maintained generally stable credit quality through the pandemic and recession. S&P Global Ratings expects continued stability in the near term, despite macro-level economic pressures. Projected stability is supported by high economic metrics relative to national peers, Massachusetts LGs' high reliance on property taxes, and a stable state-aid environment. Debt-funded infrastructure needs and underfunded retirement liabilities could pressure credit quality over the long term if local governments are unable to balance competing priorities within financial and political constraints.
S&P Global Ratings maintains ratings on 235 Massachusetts municipalities. Since November 2021, there were 13 total rating actions affecting 11 LGs, with one negative rating action and 12 positive actions on the LGs' respective general obligation (GO) bonds. Currently, 99% of the 235 Massachusetts LG GO ratings have a stable outlook, two LGs have a negative outlook, and none on positive.
Credit Fundamentals
- Stable operating environment, with generally predictable revenues and expenditures and stable state aid
- Most rated municipalities participate in a broad and diverse metropolitan statistical area (MSA)
- More than 70% of Massachusetts municipalities have good or strong management as assessed by our FMA
Potential Challenges
- For many municipalities, pension and other postemployment benefit (OPEB) liabilities and costs are generally increasing and funding discipline varies. These costs could increasingly pressure budgets if they grow faster than overall budgets
- Environmental risks may be elevated, particularly along the coast, on Cape Cod and the Islands. Managements will play an increasingly important role in addressing potential environmental risk to municipal operations and the tax base
- While the state's property tax limitation is embedded in our analysis and we do not make a distinction between municipalities' unlimited- and limited-tax pledges, growing fixed costs and capital needs could pressure managements' abilities to balance competing expenditure priorities below the levy cap
What We are Watching in 2021 and Beyond
Very few Massachusetts LGs faced material financial pressure during the pandemic and resulting recession. State aid and local property taxes, which represent the predominant revenue sources for LGs, were stable. LGs demonstrated an ability to cut expenditures, primarily through not filling vacant positions, energy and other savings due to closures stemming from pandemic gathering restrictions, postponing nonurgent capital projects, and cutting ancillary services such as recreational programming.
Unemployment rates spiked across the state, particularly in areas with significant service-related employment. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Barnstable County (10.8%), Bristol County (10.8%), Essex County (10.4%), Hampden County (11.0%), Nantucket County (11.1%), Plymouth County (10.0%), and Suffolk County (10.3%) were all elevated at more than 10% in 2020, with several other counties approaching 10%. However, the high unemployment rates did not translate to material financial pressure for LGs, and unemployment rates across the state have fallen to levels comparable with the rest of the country.
Spotlight On Environment, Social, Governance
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Massachusetts has more than 1,500 miles of coastline. The state's economic and population center in Boston, along with significant population and regional economic centers along and near the coastline, results in heightened environmental physical risk from storms, flooding, and sea-level rise. Its Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) program assists municipalities in planning for and addressing these risks. However, municipalities are likely to face increasing budgetary pressure from implementing resiliency efforts and funding capital infrastructure projects to support adaptation measures.
Although Massachusetts has generally stable population trends and demographics, outside of the Boston MSA, municipalities could face pressure from declining or aging populations. Furthermore, although property tax rates are lower than in surrounding states, which helps keep housing costs more affordable, home prices are high in and around Boston, which could lead to some social capital risks for residents. The state has a demonstrated history of intervening to support financially distressed municipalities, which can help stabilize local government credit quality, but it is less formalized than in neighboring Connecticut and Rhode Island. Additionally, given somewhat poor pension plan governance at the local level, our view of an individual municipality's risk management, culture, and oversight governance risks could vary based on how local governments incorporate forward-looking planning and projections of pension and OPEBs into their operations. Our view of governance will vary by individual local government based on its unique circumstances.
Massachusetts Local Government Data
Table 1
Massachusetts Municipalities: Medians | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating | ||||||||||||||
AAA | AA+ | AA | AA- | A+ | A | |||||||||
Projected per capita EBI (%) | 175 | 129 | 112 | 81 | 76 | 76 | ||||||||
Market value per capita ($) | 263,404 | 173,782 | 139,130 | 94,700 | 83,195 | 68,812 | ||||||||
Available general fund (%) | 21 | 20 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 5 | ||||||||
General fund performance (%) | 2.2 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 4.0 | ||||||||
Cash and expense (%) | 40 | 41 | 42 | 35 | 33 | 18 | ||||||||
Carrying charge (%) | 4.4 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 2.4 | ||||||||
Pension ARC + OPEB as % expense | 6.6 | 6.7 | 7.7 | 8.7 | 9.1 | 10.1 | ||||||||
EBI--Effective buying income. ARC--Annual required contribution. OPEB--Other postemployment benefits. |
Chart 1
Chart 2
Table 2
Massachusetts Municipalities Unlimited-Tax General Obligation: Ratings List | ||
---|---|---|
As of Sept. 19, 2022. This list was prepared by individuals on behalf of the USPF Group of S&P Global Ratings and is current as of September 19, 2022. For the most up to date, accurate, and complete information on any credit ratings referenced in this list, please visit www.standardandpoors.com. | ||
General obligation | ||
Organization | Rating | Outlook |
Abington | AA | STABLE |
Acton Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Acushnet Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Adams Twn | AA- | STABLE |
Agawam | AA+ | STABLE |
Amesbury | AA | STABLE |
Amherst | AA+ | STABLE |
Andover | AAA | STABLE |
Arlington | AAA | STABLE |
Ashland | AAA | STABLE |
Athol Twn | AA- | STABLE |
Attleboro | AA | STABLE |
Auburn | AA+ | STABLE |
Avon Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Ayer Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Barnstable | AAA | STABLE |
Bedford Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Belchertown | AA | STABLE |
Bellingham Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Belmont Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Berlin Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Beverly | AA+ | STABLE |
Billerica Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Blackstone Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Bolton Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Boston | AAA | STABLE |
Bourne Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Boxborough Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Boxford | AAA | STABLE |
Braintree | AA | NEGATIVE |
Brewster Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Brimfield Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Brockton | AA- | STABLE |
Brookline | AAA | STABLE |
Buckland | AA | STABLE |
Burlington | AAA | STABLE |
Cambridge | AAA | STABLE |
Canton Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Carver Twn | AA | STABLE |
Charlton Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Chatham | AAA | STABLE |
Chelmsford Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Chelsea | AA | STABLE |
Cheshire Twn | AA- | STABLE |
Chicopee | AA- | STABLE |
Chilmark Town | AAA | STABLE |
City of Watertown | AAA | STABLE |
Clinton Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Cohasset Town | AAA | STABLE |
Danvers Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Dartmouth | AAA | STABLE |
Dedham | AAA | STABLE |
Dennis | AAA | STABLE |
Dracut Town | AA | STABLE |
Dudley Twn | AA | STABLE |
Duxbury Twn | AAA | STABLE |
East Bridgewater | AA | STABLE |
East Longmeadow Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Eastham | AA+ | STABLE |
Easthampton | AA+ | STABLE |
Erving Twn | AA | STABLE |
Essex | AA+ | STABLE |
Everett | AA+ | STABLE |
Fairhaven Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Falmouth Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Fitchburg | A+ | STABLE |
Foxborough Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Framingham | AA | STABLE |
Franklin Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Freetown | AA+ | STABLE |
Gardner | AA- | STABLE |
Gloucester | AA | STABLE |
Grafton Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Granby | AA | STABLE |
Great Barrington | AAA | STABLE |
Greenfield | AA- | STABLE |
Groton Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Hadley | AAA | STABLE |
Halifax Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Hamilton Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Hampden Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Harvard Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Harwich | AAA | STABLE |
Hatfield | AA | STABLE |
Haverhill | AA | STABLE |
Hingham Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Holden | AA+ | STABLE |
Holliston | AAA | STABLE |
Holyoke | A+ | STABLE |
Hopkinton Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Hubbardston Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Hudson Twn | AA | STABLE |
Hull | AA | STABLE |
Ipswich Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Lakeville | AA+ | STABLE |
Lawrence | A+ | STABLE |
Lee Twn | AA | STABLE |
Leicester Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Lenox | AAA | STABLE |
Leominster | AA | STABLE |
Leverett Twn | AA | STABLE |
Lexington Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Lincoln Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Littleton | AAA | STABLE |
Longmeadow Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Lowell | AA- | STABLE |
Lunenburg | AA+ | STABLE |
Lynn | A+ | STABLE |
Lynnfield | AA+ | STABLE |
Malden | AA | STABLE |
Manchester-By-The-Sea | AAA | STABLE |
Mansfield | AA+ | STABLE |
Marblehead Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Marion Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Marlborough | AAA | STABLE |
Marshfield Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Mashpee Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Mattapoisett | AAA | STABLE |
Medford | AA+ | STABLE |
Medway | AAA | STABLE |
Melrose | AA+ | STABLE |
Mendon | AA+ | STABLE |
Merrimac | AA+ | STABLE |
Methuen | AA- | STABLE |
Middleborough Twn | AA | STABLE |
Middleton | AA+ | STABLE |
Millbury Twn | AA | STABLE |
Milton | AAA | STABLE |
Monson Town | AA | STABLE |
Montague Twn | AA | STABLE |
Nantucket Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Natick | AAA | STABLE |
Needham | AAA | STABLE |
New Bedford | AA- | STABLE |
Newbury | AAA | STABLE |
Newburyport | AAA | STABLE |
Newton | AAA | STABLE |
Norfolk Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
North Adams | A | STABLE |
North Andover | AAA | STABLE |
North Attleborough | AA+ | STABLE |
North Brookfield Twn | AA- | STABLE |
Northampton | AAA | STABLE |
Northbridge Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Norton Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Norwell Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Norwood | AA+ | STABLE |
Oak Bluffs | AA+ | STABLE |
Orange Twn | A+ | STABLE |
Orleans Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Otis | AA | STABLE |
Pelham Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Pembroke Twn | AA | STABLE |
Petersham Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Pittsfield | A+ | STABLE |
Plympton | AA+ | STABLE |
Provincetown | AA+ | STABLE |
Quincy | AA | STABLE |
Randolph Twn | AA | STABLE |
Raynham | AA+ | STABLE |
Reading | AAA | STABLE |
Revere | AA | STABLE |
Richmond | AA+ | STABLE |
Rochester | AA+ | STABLE |
Rockland Twn | AA | STABLE |
Rockport Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Rowley Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Rutland Twn | AA | STABLE |
Salem | AA | STABLE |
Salisbury | AA | STABLE |
Sandwich Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Saugus | AA+ | STABLE |
Scituate Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Seekonk Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Sherborn | AAA | STABLE |
Shirley Twn | AA | STABLE |
Shrewsbury | AAA | STABLE |
Somerville | AA+ | STABLE |
Southampton Twn | AA- | STABLE |
Southborough | AAA | STABLE |
Southbridge Twn | AA- | STABLE |
Springfield | AA- | NEGATIVE |
Stockbridge Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Stoneham | AA+ | STABLE |
Stoughton | AA | STABLE |
Stow Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Sturbridge Town | AA+ | STABLE |
Sudbury | AAA | STABLE |
Sutton Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Swampscott | AA+ | STABLE |
Swansea Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Taunton | AA | STABLE |
Tewksbury Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Tisbury | AA+ | STABLE |
Topsfield | AAA | STABLE |
Town of Holbrook | AA- | STABLE |
Town of Kingston | AA+ | STABLE |
Town of Ludlow | AA- | STABLE |
Town of Plymouth | AA+ | STABLE |
Town of Sharon | AA | STABLE |
Town of Upton | AA+ | STABLE |
Truro Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Twn of Groveland | AA+ | STABLE |
Tyngsborough | AA+ | STABLE |
Uxbridge Twn | AA | STABLE |
Wakefield Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Walpole | AA+ | STABLE |
Waltham | AA+ | STABLE |
Ware | AA | STABLE |
Wareham | AA+ | STABLE |
Wellfleet | AAA | STABLE |
Wenham Twn | AAA | STABLE |
West Boylston Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
West Bridgewater | AA+ | STABLE |
West Newbury | AAA | STABLE |
West Springfield | AA | STABLE |
West Tisbury Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Westborough Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Westfield | AA | STABLE |
Westford Twn | AAA | STABLE |
Westhampton | AA+ | STABLE |
Westminster | AA+ | STABLE |
Weston | AAA | STABLE |
Westwood | AAA | STABLE |
Weymouth | AA | STABLE |
Wilbraham | AA+ | STABLE |
Williamsburg Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Wilmington | AA+ | STABLE |
Winchendon | A+ | STABLE |
Winchester | AAA | STABLE |
Winthrop | AA | STABLE |
Woburn | AAA | STABLE |
Worcester | AA- | STABLE |
Wrentham Twn | AA+ | STABLE |
Yarmouth | AA+ | STABLE |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Christian Richards, Washington D.C. + 1 (617) 530 8325; christian.richards@spglobal.com |
Anthony Polanco, Manchester + 1 (617) 530 8234; anthony.polanco@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contact: | Charlene P Butterfield, New York + 1 (212) 438 2741; charlene.butterfield@spglobal.com |
Research Contributor: | Akash J Pandey, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.