articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220922-charter-school-brief-texas-12500328 content esgSubNav
In This List

Charter School Brief: Texas


Hurricane Ian: Most Municipal Utility Ratings, Bolstered By Significant Liquidity, Are Expected To Be Unaffected


Russia-Ukraine Military Conflict: Key Takeaways From Our Articles


Cyber Risk In A New Era: U.S. Colleges And Universities Go Back To School On Cyber Security Preparedness


Recent Pension Funding Gains For Largest U.S. Cities Are Expected To Be Short-Lived

Charter School Brief: Texas


As of Sept. 22, 2022, S&P Global Ratings maintains 33 public ratings on charter schools, in the State of Texas, which, along with California, tops our list of states with the most rated charter schools. Today, Texas is home to more than 900 charter schools, serving more than 400,000 students. The Texas legislature enacted its charter school law in 1995, and in the fall of 1996, the state's first charter schools opened their doors.

Chart 1


The credit profiles for our rated charter schools in Texas are slightly superior to those for the rest of the sector, with 61% of schools achieving investment-grade ratings compared with just 43% for the sector as a whole. We attribute this credit strength to more supportive state laws for charter schools compared with the rest of the country. These include the acceptance of qualifying bonds issued by charter schools into the Texas Permanent School Fund (PSF) Bond Guarantee Program, which can significantly lower a school's cost of capital by serving as a credit enhancement for guaranteed bonds.

In Texas, all charter schools are tuition-free, open-enrollment public schools that can be approved to expand under existing charters, although there is a cap on new charter schools (305) that could temper expansion at some point. The Texas PSF Bond Guarantee Program has separate capacity limits for charter schools and traditional public schools. While traditional public schools are nearing capacity at 85% of available funds used, charter schools have more capacity with 50% of funds still left to be accessed and therefore we do not expect capacity limits to affect the charter sector in the state at present. As of July 31, 2022, total bonds guaranteed by the PSF reached more than $100 billion for traditional public schools and more than $3 billion for charter schools.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the Texas State Board of Education both have rulings that limit the PSF's capacity to guarantee debt; of the two, the IRS ruling is currently the most restrictive, capping the capacity at $117.3 billion. This limit will not affect charter schools until they reach their capacity of $7.78 billion, which demonstrates material remaining capacity in the TX PSF program for charter schools. (For more information about the PSF guarantee see our report on the Texas PSF, published June 25, 2021, on Ratings Direct.).

Authorizer Framework

  • All 33 rated charter schools in Texas are authorized by the Texas Education Agency (TEA), most for a maximum term of five years; renewals, if approved, can extend as long as 10 years.
  • In accordance with state statute, local school districts, colleges or universities, and home rule districts (charter districts within a school district) may be authorizers as well.
  • We view the governance, financial performance, academic reports, and consecutive charter renewals from the state as favorable indications of an acceptable relationship between the TEA, which remains the most prevalent authorizer, and charter schools.
  • Not surprisingly, rated charter schools are clustered in major cities across the state, and the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan statistical area is home to the majority of the charter schools that we rate.

Credit Fundamentals

Table 1

Fiscal 2021 Texas Charter School Medians
A-/BBB+/BBB BBB- BB+/BB BB-/B+ Texas medians
No. of ratings 5 15 9 4 33
Enrollment (no.) 31,429 1,554 1,210 1,326 1,554
Waitlist as a % of enrollment 19.7 28.4 6.5 0.0 16.25
Student retention rate (%) 89.0 87.8 84.0 79.0 85.7
Lease-adjusted MADS coverage (x) 2.3 2.3 1.5 2.0 1.9
Lease-adjusted MADS burden (% total revenues) 9.0 11.1 12.1 13.8 11.1
Days' unrestricted cash on hand (no.) 140.0 165.3 145.2 123.6 140.0
Total revenue ($000) 400,125 19,292 16,545 13,897 19,292

More than half of our rated schools in Texas match our definition of a charter network and have multiple campuses. But while Texas is home to numerous large systems, many charter schools in the state also operate at a single site. The state includes the only 'A' category rated charter school we rate (IDEA Public Schools: A-/Negative ).

Generally, Texas public schools serve a larger student population than their peers across the country given continued school-age population growth across counties in the state. This results in median enrollment levels, and in some cases, operating budgets, that are significantly higher when compared with medians for the entire sector. While Texas charter schools are not allowed to levy a property tax, and they do not receive an allocation of property taxes levied by local traditional public school districts as in other states; they do continue to receive state funding to cover lease and building facility costs, which we view as favorable for charters in the state.

Chart 2


Enrollment in charter schools continues to rise, compared with a decline in traditional school districts across the state. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Texas charter schools' enrollment increased by 8.6% and school districts' enrollment dropped by 2.9%.

What We're Watching

School choice vouchers.   Will school vouchers become an option in the state? Although Texas is not one of the nearly 20 states including districts and territories) offering a voucher program, the conversation surrounding vouchers could change following upcoming elections. We have ratings is about a handful of states and territories that have voucher programs. We will continue to monitor how Texas views voucher programs and the potential for traction and if it results in any shifts in charter school enrollment trends.

Mid-term elections.   In Texas, voters will elect officials for seven statewide seats, including the governor. In addition, voters will elect officials for district-based congressional and legislative offices, the state board of education, and judicial seats. Recent events, such as the tragic mass shooting at a Uvalde elementary school and the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade, have reshaped the final months of the race, making it more competitive between candidates. We will continue to monitor the outcome of the elections and what the potential effects could be for charter schools, particularly if a less charter-friendly governor is elected.

Population growth.   While certain regions in the state's four major counties, namely Dallas, are experiencing school-age population declines, overall, all school-age population projections for Texas' major counties indicate growth of 1% to 11% over the next five years. We believe that this expected growth will enable both traditional public schools and charters schools to continue to operate in a more favorable demand environment than states that are seeing material declines among their respective school-age population, which we view positively.

More charter restrictions.   In Texas, current state law does not require charter officials to host a local public hearing of how their proposed new charter school will affect local community public schools before opening--although traditional public districts might submit projected effects to the TEA about their budgets. The new federal rules would require charters seeking grants to provide a detailed analysis of how the new charter facility would impact surrounding traditional school districts, including demonstrating sufficient student demand via an assessment. We will continue to monitor how these new rules affect the creation of new charters as well as expansion of existing charter organizations.

Steady funding environment.   Charter schools continue to receive substantial state support based on a formula with a base level of funding plus additional funds tied to the demographic population served, which is weighted to benefit those serving economically disadvantaged populations. State funding has been held flat since 2019 when the basic allotment was increased nearly 20% to $6,160 from $5,140. The recently announced $27 billion budget surplus has generated many proposals for how best to use the funds, including many related to school finance. We will continue to monitor the outcome of the 2022 elections for any potential changes in the 2023 legislative session.

Pension funding levels.   All public school employees in Texas, including charter school teachers in , must participate in the Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS), which is adequately funded in our view at 88.8%. Proposed Senate Bill 12 would increase how much the state, school districts, and current teachers contribute to the pension fund over the next six years. We believe that this should continue to support current system funding levels without a material adverse effect on charter school margins over our outlook horizon, and we continue to view the funded status and 100% contribution rate of charter district participants favorably.

Teacher shortage.   Schools across the country are facing challenges related to teacher shortages and Texas is no stranger to these pressures. While the state reportedly certified almost 26,000 new teachers in 2020-2021 and the attrition rate hovered about 9% during the school year, reflective of the current climate, attrition has reportedly risen to almost 12% during the 2021-2022 school year. We will continue to monitor how schools approach the challenge of recruiting and retaining quality instructors and the subsequent effects on both classroom performance and respective budgets.

Long-term use of one-time funds.   ESSER funds have provided a significant amount of operating revenue to traditional public and charter schools. Many schools have used emergency funding to hire additional full- or part-time staff to address learning loss amid the pandemic. As the wave of federal relief expires in September 2024, schools will need to ensure that current spending is sustainable or be willing to make cuts down the road.

Table 2

Texas Charter Schools Ratings List
Charter school Rating Outlook Charter contract expiration
Idea Public Schools A- Negative July 31, 2025
KIPP Texas BBB+ Stable July 31, 2028
Harmony Public Schools BBB Positive June 30, 2025
Responsive Education Solutions BBB Positive July 31, 2023
Trinity Basin Preparatory BBB Stable July 31, 2023
A+ Charter Schools, Inc. BBB- Stable July 31, 2025
Arlington Classics Academy BBB- Stable July 31, 2023
Austin Achieve Public Schools BBB- Stable July 31, 2027
Braination, Inc. (fka Educational Resources) BBB- Stable July 31, 2026
Cityscape Schools, Inc. (East Grand Preparatory Academy) BBB- Stable July 31, 2031
Compass Academy Charter School BBB- Stable July 31, 2026
Eleanor Kolitz Hebrew Language Academy BBB- Stable July 31, 2028
Golden Rule Charter School BBB- Negative July 31, 2029
Horizon Montessori Public Schools BBB- Stable July 31, 2023
Hughen Center, Inc. (The) dba Bob Hope School BBB- Stable July 1, 2024
Life School of Dallas BBB- Stable July 31, 2023
Orenda Education BBB- Stable July 31, 2025
Riverwalk Education Foundation, Inc. BBB- Negative June 30, 2023
Ser-Ninos, Inc. BBB- Stable July 31, 2031
Uplift Ed BBB- Stable July 31, 2031
Eagle Advantage Schools, Inc. dba Advantage Academy BB+ Stable July 31, 2023
Jubilee Academic Center BB+ Stable July 31, 2025
Southwest Winners Foundation, Inc. BB+ Stable July 31, 2023
Nova Charter School BB Negative July 31, 2023
NYOS Charter School, Inc. BB Stable July 31, 2023
Odyssey Academy BB Stable June 30, 2023
Texas Leadership Charter Academy BB Positive July 31, 2024
Village Tech Schools BB Stable July 31, 2028
Wayside Schools BB Stable July 31, 2023
A.W. Brown Fellowship Charter School BB- Negative July 31, 2026
LTTS Charter School, Inc. dba Universal Academy BB- Stable July 31, 2032
Winfree Academy Charter Schools BB- Stable June 30, 2025
Evolution Academy B+ Stable July 31, 2029

Jack Tortora contributed research to this article.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Brian J Marshall, Dallas + 1 (214) 871 1414;
Secondary Contacts:Alexander Enriquez, Dallas 231-459-9892;
Avani K Parikh, New York + 1 (212) 438 1133;
Jessica L Wood, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7004;
Research Contributor:Arpita Ray, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back