articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220919-real-estate-monitor-negative-rating-bias-grows-in-the-u-s-real-estate-sector-12501534 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Real Estate Monitor: Negative Rating Bias Grows In The U.S. Real Estate Sector

Capital Markets View - September 2022

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

NEWS

China's Zero-COVID Stance Poses A Bigger Threat To Firms Than Inflation, Says Report

COMMENTS

China's Zero-COVID Stance Poses A Bigger Threat To Firms Than Inflation


Real Estate Monitor: Negative Rating Bias Grows In The U.S. Real Estate Sector

Homebuilders' positive rating momentum is decreasing

Second quarter results showed a deceleration in operating momentum from the homebuilders rated by S&P Global Ratings. We believe the sector has reached peak gross margins and expect them to decline over the next several quarters, given slowing housing demand, an increase in cancellation rates, and persistent cost pressure from supply chain issues. Lately builders have been offering more incentives (from almost no incentives a year ago), such as a reduction in the sale price of the homes, pressuring profitability. Some builders have pulled financial guidance for fiscal 2022 given sharply higher mortgages rates and a weaker economic outlook. We are also seeing an uptick in cancellations as consumers reconsider their home purchases, and expect builders to slow orders given weaker demand amid supply chain constraints.

Given these headwinds, we expect our positive ratings bias for the homebuilders to moderate over the next year. We recently revised the outlook on LGI Homes Inc. to stable from positive as we expect their revenue and EBITDA to decline because of longer construction and development cycles and delayed home closings. We also revised the outlook to negative for both Brookfield Residential Properties Inc. and The Howard Hughes Corp. due to difficulty forecasting cash flows and underperforming key operating assets. The portion of ratings on positive outlook has declined from about 40% to 33% in the last quarter.

The 30-year mortgage rate has climbed to record levels since 2008, reaching above 6% as of Sept 14, 2022. This has worsened housing affordability for a generation of Americans who have grown accustomed to rates that are 200 basis points lower. According to S&P Global economists, housing affordability is the weakest it's been since 2006. Our affordability measure of mortgage payments as a share of income, assuming a 10% down payment, likely topped 25% in second-quarter 2022 for the typical first-time buyer and is set to worsen to 28% by fourth-quarter 2022--its highest since first-quarter 2007 during the financial crisis--on soaring home prices and mortgage rates, particularly for first-time home buyers (see "The American Dream May No Longer Be In Reach," published July 20, 2022).

To address affordability concerns, builders have been offering price discounts on individual homes, optional upgrades (to appliances, cabinetry, and flooring, for example) without charge, and financing incentives, such as mortgage interest rate locks and buydowns to its buyers. These incentives are meant to help the builder close on the home in the face of higher cancellation rates.

Despite the rapid slowdown in housing demand, rated homebuilders are coming off a period of strong performance and peak gross margins. While we expect profitability to start trending back towards more normalized levels, most homebuilders have improved their balance sheets and are operating with significant cushion relative to our rating downgrade triggers. Builders are adjusting to weaker demand by slowing their starts and land acquisitions, to preserve cash. They are also adjusting their pricing to get the appropriate number of deliveries.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Building materials sector is also under pressure

While second quarter results for rated building materials issuers were mostly positive given order backlogs, we expect slowing revenue growth for the building materials sector over the next year. Demand for building materials is cyclical and an expected housing cool-down will pressure demand for materials used in remodels and renovations. We expect housing starts to decline to 1.5 million in 2023 from 1.6 million in 2022 as the impact of higher mortgage rates take hold. In addition, weaker consumer confidence driven by inflationary pressure can also reduce spending on repairs and remodels. Our economists currently estimate the risk of a recession at 45% in the U.S. as economic momentum continued to worsen in recent months. High housing prices and rising interest rates hurt affordability and slowed domestic activity in recent months, which will likely worsen into 2023. As demand softens, the ability to pass on cost increases will likely diminish, resulting in growing margin pressure.

Issuers with operations in Europe could also face energy cost pressure and macro headwinds. As Europe faces continuing uncertainty about the war in Ukraine and Russia tightens the noose on natural gas, higher natural gas prices could further dampen margins. Germany and Italy are most exposed given their heavy reliance on Russian gas (see "Europe Braces For a Bleak Winter," Aug. 29, 2022). Among the rated portfolio, Mohawk Industries Inc. and Jeld-Wen Inc. generate about 28% of their revenue from Europe.

Building materials issuers have already started to feel the squeeze from cost inflation in 2022 with some reported lower margins in the first half of 2022 from supply chain issues stemming from the pandemic. Despite expectations for weaker performance, we're seeing a moderation in input costs with oil and commodities prices already declining from peak levels, which could help mitigate revenue pressure in the next few quarters. In addition, we expect the commercial end market to remain more resilient despite a softening in the residential end market.

As spending slows and cost pressure persists, we think building material issuers more exposed to new construction and discretionary general materials to face more pressure than those exposed to aggregates and non-discretionary general materials (i.e. roofing, HVAC) or infrastructure and commercial end markets. In particular, aggregates companies could benefit in coming years from spending related to the country's $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

Currently, 88% of ratings have stable outlooks. We recently affirmed the ratings on Mannington Mills Inc. and maintained a stable outlook as we expect credit metrics to remain in line with the rating despite our expectations for slower revenue growth. We also recently assigned our 'A-2' to Vulcan Materials' new $1.6 billion commercial paper program. We lowered the ratings on Cornerstone Building Brands Inc. following the leveraged buyout by Clayton Dubilier & Rice, given our expectation for leverage to rise towards the 6x-7x range in the next year.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

REITs' revenue growth will slow

While overall operating results for rated REITs in the second quarter were mostly positive, we expect slowing revenue growth in the next few quarters as consumer spending weakens and the impact of interest rate hikes take hold. We think retail REITs could see some pressure from tenants holding bloated inventory levels amid weaker consumer demand. This could result in a deterioration of retail tenant quality and a growing watch list after a period of stabilization. For the office sector, we expect a slow pace in employees returning to office and a deteriorating job market to dampen demand for office real estate over the next year. We revised the outlook on Office Properties Income Trust to negative given its elevated debt leverage and increased execution risk related to the company's proposed asset sales. Currently 85% of ratings have stable outlooks, with the remainder split between positive and negative outlooks.

Chart 5

image

On the flipside, we expect industrials and rental housing REITs to remain resilient and we took a number of positive rating actions in recent months. We upgraded Prologis Inc. to 'A' from 'A-' given or expectations for strong operating performance amid favorable tailwinds for industrial assets and significant mark-to-market rent spread potential despite a slowing economic outlook. We also upgraded Mid-America Apartment Communities Inc. to 'A-' from 'BBB+' given its track record of above-average NOI growth, low debt leverage, and a conservative financial policy.

Chart 6

image

Debt issuance by equity REITs remained subdued through August 2022 given rising rates, market volatility and limited refinancing needs. Capital raising activity slowed significantly in 2022, with equity REITs raising 72% less in capital compared to a year ago and we don't expect the market to pick up in the near term. REITs equity prices have also come under pressure. Publicly listed U.S. equity REITs traded at a median 19.1% discount to their consensus S&P Capital IQ net asset value per-share estimates as of the end of August, a further decline from the 12.9% discount at which they traded as of July.

Chart 7

image

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Ana Lai, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 6895;
ana.lai@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Maurice S Austin, New York + 1 (212) 438 2077;
maurice.austin@spglobal.com
William R Ferara, Princeton + 1 (212) 438 1776;
bill.ferara@spglobal.com
Kristina Koltunicki, Princeton + 1 (212) 438 7242;
kristina.koltunicki@spglobal.com
Michael H Souers, Princeton + 1 (212) 438 2508;
michael.souers@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.


Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back