Overview
- We reviewed Azure Finance No. 2's performance by conducting our analysis of the transaction's underlying assets and structural features.
- Following our review, we raised our ratings on the class B, C, D-Dfrd, and E-Dfrd notes. At the same time, we affirmed our ratings on the class A and F-Dfrd notes.
- Azure Finance No. 2 is an asset-backed securitization backed by a portfolio of U.K. auto loan receivables originated by Blue Motor Finance.
LONDON (S&P Global Ratings) July 26, 2022--S&P Global Ratings today raised its credit ratings on Azure Finance No.2 PLC's class B notes to 'AAA (sf)' from 'AA+ (sf)', class C notes to 'A+ (sf)' from 'A (sf)', class D-Dfrd notes to 'A- (sf)' from 'BBB (sf)', and class E-Dfrd notes to 'B+ (sf)' from 'B (sf)'. At the same time, we affirmed our 'AAA (sf)' and 'CCC+ (sf)' ratings on the class A and F-Dfrd notes, respectively.
Today's rating actions follow our review of the transaction's performance and the application of our current criteria, and reflect our assessment of the payment structure according to the transaction documents (see "Related Criteria").
We analyzed the transaction's credit risk under our updated global auto ABS criteria, which fully supersede our previous auto ABS criteria. Our standard recovery rate assumption for investment and speculative grade ratings was replaced with tiered recoveries (recovery rate base case and increasingly stressful recovery rate haircuts at higher ratings). Our rising, flat, and down stress interest rate scenarios were replaced by interest rate curves based on the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross framework specific to each rating category.
The transaction has amortized strictly sequentially since closing in July 2020 (see "New Issue: Azure Finance No.2 PLC," published on July 28, 2020). This has resulted in increased credit enhancement for the outstanding notes, most notably for the senior and mezzanine notes. As of the April 2022 servicer report, the pool factor had declined to 37.9% (for non-defaulted receivables), and the available credit enhancement for the class A, B, C, D-Dfrd, and E-Dfrd notes had increased to 88.3%, 51.4%, 27.6%, 19.7%, and 9.8%, respectively, compared with 34.6%, 20.6%, 11.6%, 8.6%, and 4.8% at closing. As the class F-Dfrd notes are only backed by the reserve fund, there is no increase in credit enhancement for this class of notes. The uncollateralized class X1-Dfrd and X2 notes have now redeemed.
Realized losses, both from hostile and voluntary terminations, are in line with our expectation at our last review.
Observed gross losses from hostile terminations and voluntary terminations are currently (based on the April 2022 investor report) at 3.2% and 0.7%, respectively.
We therefore maintained our base-case hostile termination assumption at 7.75%. We removed a 0.25% COVID-19 adjustment from our base-case voluntary termination assumption. Consequently, we revised our voluntary termination base-case to 3.50% from 3.75% at closing.
Given the well-seasoned pool and relatively low pool factor, we reduced the applicable multiple at the 'AAA' rating level to 4.00x from 4.25x at closing for hostile terminations, and to 2.00x from 2.70x at closing for voluntary terminations.
The purchased loan receivables arise from used car financing, predominantly in the near-prime market. As such, the transaction includes receivables with relatively long original maturities of up to 85 months, original loan-to-value (LTV) ratios up to 125%, and higher vehicle ages. The age distribution of the vehicles, based on the April 2022 investor report suggests that a fifth of the portfolio could be non-euro 6 diesel-powered vehicles, which we believe could face lower recoveries. We factored these while determining our recovery rate haircuts to determine the stressed recovery assumption.
Based on this and the observed recoveries on defaulted receivables so far, we considered a recovery rate base-case of 40.0% for all rating levels. For recoveries related to hostile terminations, we assumed 100% to be realized nine months after default. We did not apply any recovery lag for voluntary terminations since vehicles must be returned by the obligors to exercise this right.
Lastly, as the collateral backing the notes comprises U.K. fully amortizing fixed-rate auto loan receivables arising under hire purchase agreements, the transaction is not exposed to residual value risk.
Table 1
Credit Assumptions Summary--Current Review | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rating level | Cumulative HT base-case (%) | HT stress multiple (x) | Stressed cumulative HT (%) | Cumulative VT base-case (%) | VT stress multiple (x) | Stressed cumulative VT (%) | Recovery rate haircut (%) | Stressed recovery rate (%) | Stressed cumulative net losses (%) | |||||||||||
AAA | 7.75 | 4.00 | 31.00 | 3.5 | 2 | 7.00 | 25 | 30.00 | 26.60 | |||||||||||
A+ | 7.75 | 2.50 | 19.38 | 3.5 | 1.63 | 5.71 | 20.6 | 31.76 | 17.11 | |||||||||||
A- | 7.75 | 1.83 | 14.18 | 3.5 | 1.42 | 4.97 | 17.5 | 33.00 | 12.83 | |||||||||||
BBB+ | 7.75 | 1.75 | 13.56 | 3.5 | 1.38 | 4.83 | 16.9 | 33.24 | 12.28 | |||||||||||
BBB- | 7.75 | 1.42 | 11.01 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 4.20 | 13.3 | 34.68 | 9.93 | |||||||||||
B+ | 7.75 | 1.13 | 8.76 | 3.5 | 1.05 | 3.68 | 7.5 | 37.00 | 7.83 | |||||||||||
B | 7.75 | 1.00 | 7.75 | 3.5 | 1 | 3.50 | 5 | 38.00 | 6.98 | |||||||||||
Based on the closing pool balance. HT--Hostile termination. VT--Voluntary termination. |
We performed our cash flow analysis to test the effect of the amended credit assumptions and deleveraging in the structure.
Our cash flow analysis indicates that the available credit enhancement for the class B, C, D-Dfrd, and E-Dfrd notes is sufficient to withstand the credit and cash flow stresses that we apply at the 'AAA', 'A+', 'A-' and 'B+' ratings, respectively. We therefore raised to 'AAA (sf)', 'A+ (sf)', 'A- (sf)' and 'B+ (sf)', from 'AA+ (sf)', 'A (sf)', 'BBB (sf)', and 'B (sf)' our ratings on the class B, C, D-Dfrd, and E-Dfrd notes, respectively.
Our cash flow analysis indicates that the available credit enhancement for the class A notes is sufficient to withstand the credit and cash flow stresses that we apply at the 'AAA' rating. We therefore affirmed our rating on the class A notes.
The class F-Dfrd notes do not pass a 'B' level of credit and cash flow stress. We believe this class of notes is vulnerable to nonpayment, and depends on favorable business, financial, or economic conditions to be repaid, according to our criteria for assigning 'CCC+', CCC, 'CCC-', and 'CC' ratings (see "Related Criteria"). We therefore affirmed our 'CCC+ (sf)' rating on the class F-Dfrd notes.
Our credit stability analysis indicates that the maximum projected deterioration that we would expect at each rating level for one-year horizons under moderate stress conditions is in line with our criteria.
There are no rating constraints under our operational risk criteria. In addition, there are no rating constraints under our counterparty or structured finance sovereign risk criteria, and legal risks continue to be adequately mitigated, in our view.
Azure Finance No. 2 securitizes a portfolio of auto loan receivables, which Blue Motor Finance granted to its U.K. clients.
Related Criteria
- Criteria | Structured Finance | ABS: Global Auto ABS Methodology And Assumptions, March 31, 2022
- General Criteria: Environmental, Social, And Governance Principles In Credit Ratings, Oct. 10, 2021
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Framework For Payment Structure And Cash Flow Analysis Of Structured Finance Securities, Dec. 22, 2020
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Methodology To Derive Stressed Interest Rates In Structured Finance, Oct. 18, 2019
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Counterparty Risk Framework: Methodology And Assumptions, March 8, 2019
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Incorporating Sovereign Risk In Rating Structured Finance Securities: Methodology And Assumptions, Jan. 30, 2019
- Legal Criteria: Structured Finance: Asset Isolation And Special-Purpose Entity Methodology, March 29, 2017
- Criteria | Structured Finance | ABS: Global Methodology And Assumptions For Assessing The Credit Quality Of Securitized Consumer Receivables, Oct. 9, 2014
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Framework For Assessing Operational Risk In Structured Finance Transactions, Oct. 9, 2014
- General Criteria: Methodology Applied To Bank Branch-Supported Transactions, Oct. 14, 2013
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Derivative Agreement Criteria, June 24, 2013
- General Criteria: Criteria For Assigning 'CCC+', 'CCC', 'CCC-', And 'CC' Ratings, Oct. 1, 2012
- General Criteria: Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Methodology For Servicer Risk Assessment, May 28, 2009
Related Research
- EMEA Structured Finance Chart Book: July 2022, July 7, 2022
- U.K. Economic Outlook For Q3 2022 Signals The Great Inflation Squeeze, June 27, 2022
- Global Credit Conditions Special Update: Inflation, War, And COVID Drag On, May 17, 2022
- European Auto ABS Index Report Q1 2022, May 16, 2022
- United Kingdom 'AA/A-1+' Ratings Affirmed; Outlook Stable, April 22, 2022
- Azure Finance No. 2 Class B, C, And D U.K. Auto ABS Notes Ratings Raised Following Review; Other Ratings Affirmed, July 30, 2021
- New Issue: Azure Finance No.2 PLC, July 28, 2020
- 2017 EMEA ABS Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis, July 6, 2017
- Global Structured Finance Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis 2016: The Effects Of The Top Five Macroeconomic Factors, Dec. 16, 2016
- European Structured Finance Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis 2016: The Effects Of The Top Five Macroeconomic Factors, Dec. 16, 2016
Primary Credit Analyst: | Marta O'Gorman, London + 44 20 7176 2523; marta.ogorman@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.