articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/211130-economic-research-eurozone-economic-outlook-2022-a-look-inside-the-recovery-12204638 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Economic Research: Eurozone Economic Outlook 2022: A Look Inside The Recovery

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Limited Supply Poses A Barrier To The U.S. Homebuying Dream

COMMENTS

Economic Research: U.S. Real-Time Data: Economic Activity Slows As Omicron Takes Center Stage

COMMENTS

Economic Research: U.S. Economic Roundup: Tight Job Market Allows For More Fed Tightening

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Where Is The Wage Inflation? Not In Europe


Economic Research: Eurozone Economic Outlook 2022: A Look Inside The Recovery

Will the new wave of COVID-19 infections derail the recovery?

S&P Global Ratings believes the recent rise in COVID-19 cases in some European countries will somewhat slow the recovery in consumption but still allow the eurozone economy to surpass pre-pandemic levels of activity in fourth-quarter 2021. Some governments--such as in Austria, the Netherlands, and Belgium--are imposing some restrictions to economic activity, which are dampening consumer-facing businesses. Google retail and recreation mobility data for these countries is already down about 10% in recent weeks from pre-pandemic levels. Plus, even in countries less affected by the recent COVID-19 wave, governments have put travel restrictions in place. Yet, it is too early to call for a drop in output. First, it is still unclear whether the Omicron variant is resistant to vaccines and whether it is very deadly. Second, as the last lockdown shows, restrictions don't necessarily reduce aggregate demand. Businesses and consumers have learned to live with them, and governments can easily extend or reactivate support measures--such as furlough schemes and credit guarantees. What's more, the industry still has large unfilled orders to complete and real-time indicators (such as truck mileage) suggest that manufacturing activity resumed in the fourth quarter. Finally, a slowdown in the latter part of the fourth quarter might be offset by a stronger recovery in February or March 2022.

S&P Global Ratings believes the new Omicron variant is a stark reminder that the COVID-19 pandemic is far from over. Although already declared a variant of concern by the World Health Organization, uncertainty still surrounds its transmissibility, severity, and the effectiveness of existing vaccines against it. Early evidence points toward faster transmissibility, which has led many countries to close their borders with Southern Africa or reimpose international travel restrictions. Over coming weeks, we expect additional evidence and testing will show the extent of the danger it poses to enable us to make a more informed assessment of the risks to credit. Meanwhile, we expect the markets to take a precautionary stance and governments to put into place short-term containment measures. Nevertheless, we believe this shows that, once again, more coordinated, and decisive efforts are needed to vaccinate the world's population to prevent the emergence of new, more dangerous variants.

Will the eurozone continue to suffer from supply chain bottlenecks?

Our forecast for the eurozone economy is broadly unchanged from our September baseline, but we have modified our view of specific country trends. We are now more optimistic about growth prospects for France and Italy, and less so about Germany's and Spain's (see our forecast table at the end of this article). The reopening this summer benefited services-oriented economies like France much more than manufacturing-oriented economies such as Germany or tourist destinations in Spain.

Industry continues to face supply chain shortages, with September industrial production in Germany about 10% below its 2019 average, even though factory orders are 10% higher (see chart 1). Shortages are particularly acute for the automobile industry, where production in September was 42% below its 2019 average, close to its 2020 lows (see chart 2). Interestingly Italy, the eurozone's second industrial powerhouse, has suffered less from these shortages because of a slightly different specialization; industrial production there has been hovering close to its pre-pandemic levels since the summer (see chart 3).

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

Supply bottlenecks should start to ease as we move into 2022. First signs of a reversal are already visible. Shipping costs, lumber prices, and a backlog of orders for Taiwan manufactures are now easing, suggesting that the peak in supply chain pressures may be behind us. Nonetheless, most businesses expect those constraints to hinder production until second-half 2022 (see "Global Corporates: Supply Chain Strains And Rising Costs Will Pressure Profitability in 2022," published on Nov. 18, 2021). What's more, a slightly less dynamic Chinese economy will also weigh on German exporters' prospects, which means that German GDP is set to recover to pre-pandemic levels only in first-quarter 2022, one quarter after the eurozone average.

Meanwhile, the slowdown in Spain cannot be explained by supply-chain bottlenecks but rather a high specialization in tourism. As travel takes time to recover to pre-pandemic levels, tourism-oriented economies are also set to underperform their peers in the recovery. In Spain, tourism arrivals in third-quarter 2021 were still one-half those for third-quarter 2019 because of travel restrictions.

Finally, the rollout of recovery packages can also provide some support to the economy while bottlenecks continue (see "Next Generation EU Will Shift European Growth Into A Higher Gear," April 27, 2021). France had already disbursed close to half of its recovery stimulus this summer, helping companies restart the economy more quickly. In Italy, although some disbursements have already been postponed to next year--a bit later than originally expected--the start of the wide-ranging reform plan (notably for the judiciary, public administration, and taxation) has lifted consumer and business confidence to levels not seen since 2001 and seems to have given a positive impetus to investment as well.

Which sectors are recovering the quickest, and what does it mean for employment and productivity?

The post-pandemic economy so far looks much different than recoveries of the past. Sectoral data shows that the winners of this crisis have been in the information and communication sector, along with finance and real estate (see chart 4). Government services (public administration, health, and education) also make up a larger share of output because of the need to support the economy during the crisis and recovery. By contrast, consumer-facing activities still have some way to go--especially arts and entertainment, where employment has also dropped the most (see chart 5), but retail and wholesale are also still lagging behind the total aggregate, and manufacturing is also well below its pre-pandemic level because of continued supply chain constraints.

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

image

Interestingly, this crisis has not featured the typical overall destruction of employment. Instead, before activity recovered jobs overshot pre-pandemic levels in France and Spain, which is unusual as job creation normally lags GDP growth. This can be partly attributed to furloughs, which preserved pre-pandemic jobs. Less than 1% of European workers are now on furlough and unlike in the U.S., European workers have not left the labor market (see chart 6 and see "Where Are The Workers? Three Explanations Point To An Answer," Nov. 4, 2021). As a result, labor shortages are just starting to appear and are mostly concentrated in the sectors where furlough schemes were less efficient at keeping jobs alive, such as the accommodation and food industry or retail trade sector.

Chart 6

image

The reallocation of labor observable in the sectoral data points to some positive trends for productivity—but the use of savings points to a big negative one. Employment creation has been more dynamic in higher productivity-enhancing sectors (like information and communication) and for more highly skilled workers. While policy support to corporates has prevented much destruction of the economic fabric, many new businesses have been created since the outbreak of the pandemic. They might turn out to be more productive than existing firms. On the other hand, the sharp rise in nonproductive investments such as housing is a negative development for productivity. A large part of savings accumulated by consumers during lockdowns is going toward buying property (see "European Housing Market Inflation Is Here To Stay," Nov. 2, 2021). This is not only worsening housing affordability and inequality but also likely to act as a drag on total aggregate productivity.

Is above-target inflation here to stay?

We expect inflation to slow as we move into 2022 as temporary drivers start to fade. These were linked to the reopening of economies (for example, the end of tax cuts) and the mismatch between supply and demand globally, which sent energy prices higher and created supply chain bottlenecks (see chart 7).

Chart 7

image

As the year turns, base effects, such as the return of the German VAT to pre-pandemic levels or the spike in oil prices in 2021 (up 122% in November in euro terms), will start to fall out of the yearly inflation numbers (see chart 8). What's more, we estimate that government measures to limit the rise in gas and energy prices will have a sizable impact next year, reducing headline inflation 0.3 percentage points in Germany for 2022. What's more, inflation may fall at the start of 2022 if the Omicron variant leads to a drop in demand, because that will likely lower energy prices.

Chart 8

image

At the same time, companies' non-energy input costs will start falling as supply chain bottlenecks start to ease in mid-2022, especially because they have tended to place larger orders than needed to rebuild inventories in the face of shortages, which could trigger some oversupply. This should lead to lower non-energy industrial goods inflation from 2023 as the current boost diminishes from producer prices, on the order of 0.3-0.4 percentage points for 2022.

The labor market and wages will take a bit more time to fuel higher prices. We expect that to happen only from the end of 2023. Job levels have recovered in some countries already and vacancy rates are now above pre-pandemic levels for the eurozone average. However, we expect more workers to enter the labor market as job prospects improve further (especially in countries like Italy and Spain, where participation rates have yet to recover), which would somewhat alleviate shortages. Second, we find that companies in Europe expect wages to rise only "a little" next year (see "Global Corporates: Supply Chain Strains and Rising Costs Will Pressure Profitability in 2022"). Adding to that, if higher wages are concomitant with productivity improvements, wages might not have an inflationary impact. Compensation per hour is expanding less than output per hour in most sectors of the European economy, which translates into falling unit labor costs, easing the pressure from non-labor costs for producers (see chart 9). As a result, we see the inflation rate falling to 2% in 2022 from 4.9% in November 2021, and decreasing to 1.5% in 2023 before rising to 1.7% in 2024.

Chart 9

image

Will the ECB tighten monetary policy as soon as next year?

The European Central Bank in our view will wait until early 2024 to start raising rates, after tapering net asset purchases from the end of 2023. Even if inflation has risen above the ECB's 2% average inflation target, this was mostly temporary. Indeed, prices in October were just 3.7% higher than two years ago, so still below target (see chart 10). Meanwhile, the ECB is likely to wait for the U.S. Federal Reserve to tighten monetary policy first, as this will be a first source of upward pressure on eurozone long-term yields and trigger some tightening in eurozone financing conditions (see "How Long Can The ECB Yield Shield Last?" June 11, 2021).

Chart 10

image

The ECB will provide more guidance about next steps at its December meeting, including for its quantitative easing (QE) programs. Unless the new COVID-19 variant proves resistant to vaccines and deadly, we expect President Christine Lagarde to clarify the phasing out of the pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP) from March 2022. Currently, monthly average purchases are about €65 billion, down from €90 billion in the summer (see chart 11). We expect the ECB to continue lowering its net purchases under the PEPP gradually until March 2022 to around €40 billion, so that it could easily stop them by then and carry on with slightly higher purchases under the asset purchase programme (APP)--perhaps about €40 billion a month instead of the current €20 billion. This would make it easier for the ECB to announce that it will taper in 2023. Meanwhile, we also expect the ECB to renew targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTRO) next year, to continue supporting credit growth during the recovery but with slightly less favorable terms, as a first step to normalizing its monetary policy as the economy moves closer to potential. That said, to give itself flexibility in case inflation worsens, the ECB could be tempted to adjust its two QE programs, announcing a phaseout of just the PEPP in December and waiting for March next year to announce a recalibration in size and redefinition of the guidelines for bond purchases under the APP.

Chart 11

image

S&P Global Ratings' European Economic Forecasts November 2021
GDP
Germany France Italy Spain Netherlands Belgium Eurozone U.K. Switzerland
2019 1.1 1.8 0.4 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.6 1.7 1.2
2020 (4.9) (8.0) (9.0) (10.8) (3.8) (5.7) (6.5) (9.7) (2.5)
2021 2.7 6.7 6.4 4.5 4.6 6.1 5.1 6.9 3.3
2022 4.3 3.8 4.7 7.0 3.9 3.3 4.4 4.6 3.3
2023 2.5 2.2 1.8 4.4 2.0 1.5 2.4 2.2 2.1
2024 1.5 1.6 1.0 2.4 1.8 1.4 1.6 1.9 1.6
CPI inflation
2019 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.8 2.7 1.2 1.2 1.8 0.4
2020 0.4 0.5 (0.1) (0.3) 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.9 (0.7)
2021 2.9 2.1 1.7 2.8 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.4 0.5
2022 2.2 1.9 1.7 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.4 0.7
2023 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.5 0.6
2024 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.0
Unemployment rate
2019 3.2 8.4 10.0 14.1 3.4 5.4 7.6 3.8 4.4
2020 3.9 8.0 9.3 15.5 3.8 5.6 7.9 4.5 4.8
2021 3.6 8.0 9.6 15.1 3.3 6.4 7.9 4.6 5.2
2022 3.4 7.8 9.1 14.4 3.5 5.8 7.5 4.5 4.7
2023 3.3 7.7 8.9 14.0 3.4 5.7 7.3 4.3 4.5
2024 3.2 7.4 8.7 13.8 3.3 5.6 7.1 4.0 4.5
10-year government bond
2019 (0.2) 0.1 1.9 0.7 (0.1) 0.2 0.4 0.9 (0.5)
2020 (0.5) (0.2) 1.2 0.4 (0.3) (0.1) 0.1 0.3 (0.5)
2021 (0.3) (0.0) 0.8 0.4 (0.2) (0.0) 0.1 0.8 (0.3)
2022 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.4 1.3 0.1
2023 0.3 0.6 1.6 1.1 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.9 0.2
2024 0.4 0.8 1.9 1.3 0.5 0.8 0.9 2.1 0.3
Exchange rates
Eurozone U.K. Switzerland
USD per euro USD per GBP Euro per GBP CHF per USD CHF per euro
2019 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.1
2020 1.1 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.1
2021 1.2 1.4 1.2 0.9 1.1
2022 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.1
2023 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.1
2024 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.1
Policy rates
Eurozone (ECB) U.K. (BoE) Switzerland (SNB)
Deposit Rate Refi Rate
2019 (0.4) 0.0 0.8 (0.8)
2020 (0.5) 0.0 0.2 (0.8)
2021 (0.5) 0.0 0.1 (0.8)
2022 (0.5) (0.0) 0.4 (0.8)
2023 (0.5) (0.0) 0.6 (0.8)
2024 (0.3) (0.0) 0.9 (0.6)
Source: S&P Global Ratings.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Senior Economist:Marion Amiot, London + 44(0)2071760128;
marion.amiot@spglobal.com
EMEA Chief Economist:Sylvain Broyer, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9156;
sylvain.broyer@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Debabrata Das, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P Global Ratings affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.