- Following our review of Mansard Mortgages 2007-2, we have raised our ratings on the class B1a and B2a notes.
- At the same time, we have affirmed our ratings on the class A1a, A2a, M1a, and M2a notes.
- The transaction is backed by a pool of buy-to-let and nonconforming mortgage loans on properties in the U.K. and originated by Rooftop Mortgages.
LONDON (S&P Global Ratings) Nov. 25, 2021--S&P Global Ratings today raised to 'A (sf)' from 'BBB+ (sf)' and to 'BBB+ (sf)' from 'BB+ (sf)' its credit ratings on Mansard Mortgages 2007-2 PLC's class B1a class B2a notes, respectively. At the same time, we affirmed our 'A (sf)' ratings on the class A1a, A2a, M1a, and M2a notes.
Today's rating actions reflect the improvement in the overall credit performance and the increase in available credit enhancement.
The performance of the loans in the collateral pool has improved since our previous full review in November 2019 (see "Related Research"). Based on our calculation methodology, total arrears decreased to 7.9% from 8.9% between the September 2021 and June 2019 cutoff dates. This has resulted in a decrease in our weighted-average foreclosure frequency (WAFF) at the 'AAA', 'AA', and 'A' rating levels. The WAFF has increased at the 'BBB', 'BB', and 'B' rating levels due to an increase in the severe arrears. Our weighted-average loss severity (WALS) assumptions have decreased at all rating levels, mainly due to a lower weighted-average current loan-to-value (LTV) ratio.
The overall effect from our credit analysis results is a decrease in the required credit coverage for the 'AAA', 'AA', 'A', 'BBB', and 'BB' rating levels, and a marginal increase at the 'B' rating level.
|Mansard 2007-2 PLC|
|Rating level||WAFF (%)||WALS (%)|
|WAFF--Weighted-average foreclosure frequency. WALS--Weighted-average los severity.|
Both the liquidity facility and the reserve fund are at their required levels and are non-amortizing.
Barclays Bank PLC is the guaranteed investment contract (GIC) account provider for Mansard Mortgages 2007-2. Under our counterparty criteria, our ratings on these notes are capped at our 'A' long-term issuer credit rating (ICR) on Barclays Bank PLC following its loss of an 'A-1' short-term rating and failure to take remedy action.
Following the application of our criteria, we have determined that our assigned ratings on this transaction's classes of notes should be the lower of (i) the rating as capped by our counterparty criteria, or (ii) the rating that the class of notes can attain under our global residential loans criteria.
Our credit and cash flow results for the class Ala, A2a, M1a, and M2a notes indicate that these notes could withstand our stresses at higher ratings than those assigned. However, the ratings are capped at our 'A' long-term ICR on the GIC account provider. We have therefore affirmed our 'A (sf)' ratings on the class A1a, A2a, M1a, and M2a notes.
Under our credit and cash flow analysis, the class B1a notes could withstand our stresses at a higher rating than that assigned. However, the ratings are capped at our 'A' long-term ICR on the GIC account provider. We have therefore raised to 'A (sf)' from 'BBB+ (sf)' our rating on the class B1a notes.
Under our credit and cash flow analysis, the class B2a notes could withstand our stresses at a higher rating than that assigned. As part of our analysis, we have run sensitivities with foreclosure frequencies increased by 1.1x and 1.3x, pro rata priority of payments, and delayed the time to recovery. We also considered this class of notes' relative position in the capital structure and the significantly lower credit enhancement for the subordinated class compared with that of the senior notes. We have therefore raised to 'BBB+ (sf)' from 'BB+ (sf)' our rating on the class B2a notes.
Mansard Mortgages 2007-2 is a RMBS transaction backed by a pool of buy-to-let and nonconforming mortgage loans on properties in the U.K. and originated by Rooftop Mortgages Ltd.
- General Criteria: Environmental, Social, And Governance Principles In Credit Ratings, Oct. 10, 2021
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Framework For Payment Structure And Cash Flow Analysis Of Structured Finance Securities, Dec. 22, 2020
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Methodology To Derive Stressed Interest Rates In Structured Finance, Oct. 18, 2019
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Counterparty Risk Framework: Methodology And Assumptions, March 8, 2019
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Incorporating Sovereign Risk In Rating Structured Finance Securities: Methodology And Assumptions, Jan. 30, 2019
- Criteria | Structured Finance | RMBS: Global Methodology And Assumptions: Assessing Pools Of Residential Loans, Jan. 25, 2019
- Legal Criteria: Structured Finance: Asset Isolation And Special-Purpose Entity Methodology, March 29, 2017
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Framework For Assessing Operational Risk In Structured Finance Transactions, Oct. 9, 2014
- General Criteria: Methodology Applied To Bank Branch-Supported Transactions, Oct. 14, 2013
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Derivative Agreement Criteria, June 24, 2013
- General Criteria: Global Investment Criteria For Temporary Investments In Transaction Accounts, May 31, 2012
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Methodology For Servicer Risk Assessment, May 28, 2009
- European RMBS Index Report For Q3 2021, Nov. 8, 2021
- How Will European RMBS Respond When COVID-19 Relief Measures Come To An End?, July 12, 2021
- European Economic Snapshots: Policy Is Keeping The Impact Of The Second COVID Wave At Bay, Dec. 16, 2020
- Pandemic Won’t Derail European Housing Price Rises, Oct. 20, 2020
- U.K. Mortgage Payment Holiday Risks Emerge As COVID-19 Requests Have Peaked, Sept. 2, 2020
- Various Rating Actions Taken In Three Mansard Mortgages RMBS Transactions Following Review, Nov. 19, 2019
- 2017 EMEA RMBS Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis, July 6, 2017
- Global Structured Finance Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis 2016: The Effects Of The Top Five Macroeconomic Factors, Dec. 16, 2016
- European Structured Finance Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis 2016: The Effects Of The Top Five Macroeconomic Factors, Dec. 16, 2016
|Primary Credit Analyst:||Nicola Dobson, London + 44 20 7176 3879;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.