- Pension and other postemployment benefit (OPEB) obligation bond (POB and OOB) issuance is accelerating in the U.S.
- Factors driving issuances include a favorable interest-rate environment and issuers' desire to control contribution escalation.
- Key credit concerns, while unique to each U.S. public finance (USPF) issuer, primarily include market returns falling short of expectations and pension contribution increases pressuring budgets.
- Obligations that aim to address pension liabilities might come in different forms, but with similar credit risks.
POB Issuance Accelerates
The prevalence of debt issuances to address unfunded pension liabilities continues to increase in the current low-interest-rate environment. From Jan. 1, to Sept. 15, 2021, S&P Global Ratings rated 64 new POB issuances in the USPF sector totaling nearly $6.3 billion; this is a 113% increase in rated POB issuance over the $3.0 billion issued in the entire calendar 2020.
California is still the state that has issued the most POBs, although its share has decreased now that other states have increased their new issuances. We expect continued issuance accelerations as issuers compare peers' seemingly successful transactions with their own large and growing unfunded liabilities, and some issuers might anticipate the end of record low interest rates. The recession and economic disruptions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic serve as reminders of the importance of monitoring volatility in both markets and major revenue streams. Issuers are working to stabilize annual pension and OPEB costs through debt issuance. They are also finding this an opportune time to restructure or revise plan assumptions and contribution methodologies to reduce cost deferrals. While POB issuances appear aimed at fixing annual costs associated with pension plans, only time will tell if plan assumptions, including investment return benchmarks, can be realized and if the issuances themselves will provide long-term cost savings.
The Unique Credit Risks Of POBs And OOBs
POBs and OOBs are taxable obligations that U.S. states, local governments, and other public entities use as a means to address unfunded pension liabilities by issuing debt to fund them and attempting to capture returns between portfolio investments and debt service costs. Rather than oversimplify our credit viewpoint of obligation bonds by expressing a generalized positive or negative view, we look at the individual issue at hand. With an understanding of why the bond is being issued, we analyze the changing credit picture and review management plans to mitigate the associated risks, including changes to plan benefits, contribution methodology, and actuarial assumptions.
POB issuance does not absolve the issuer of pension plan risks. Generally, we believe transactions seeking to refund a pension liability for present-value savings will often not result in savings given the likelihood of poor investment performance, experience, or other changes that could generate new liabilities greater than projected at the time of issuance. In addition, an increased spread does not mean free money; it indicates increased exposure to market volatility risk when proceeds are deposited into the pension trust. Below, we evaluate how an issuer might assess and incorporate the risks associated with market volatility and detail some of the risks involved both with pensions and the debt financing pensions Often, we see some of the expected interest savings from issuance used with the intention of offsetting some of these risks.
Market timing risk
A significant amount of money placed into the market increases exposure to near-term market movement. If markets do not perform to expectations, pension liabilities could grow, potentially defeating the purpose of issuance. Some mitigation techniques we've seen include spreading out the deposit to reduce the likelihood that the deposit is made at a low point in the market and establishing a set-aside reserve fund, often an IRC Section 115 trust dedicated to pensions, to supplement planned contributions and ease the impact on the general fund. The most well-defined set-aside funds tend to have strict definitions of when the balance can be drawn and how funds are invested, and include replenishment clauses as well as dissolution guidelines as the plan approaches full funding.
Cost escalation risk
Pension contributions could escalate over time in the form of either planned amortization payments that increase with expected payroll growth or unplanned increases due to poor experience against risky assumptions. Cost escalation can be a budgetary challenge for issuers to incorporate into their long-term budget planning. With bond issuance, this risk is often mitigated in part by defining the bond repayment schedule to not only be shorter than the pension amortization, but also closer to level dollar. These changes address costs earlier than under the current pension amortization schedule. Long-term cost savings typically stem from either plan changes or the creation of a cheaper new benefit tier for new hires.
Budgetary flexibility risk
Obligation bonds reduce debt capacity as well as create fixed cost burdens that typically have less flexibility than pension and OPEB annual contributions. This could create budgetary constraints and negatively affect an issuer's ability to manage unforeseen near-term liquidity needs.
Pension plans that appear to be overfunded, even when calculated using a high discount rate, might result in the issuer facing calls to increase benefits that are perceived to be "affordable" despite risk to the sponsor. Some higher-rated issuers have set the bond issuance to fund to less than 100% while combining de-risking efforts with issuance to reduce the likelihood of appearing overfunded.
We Expect States Will Continue To Issue Obligation Bonds While Interest Rates Are Low
As we review credit concerns for each issuance we see, and its associated risks to the issuer's budget, we anticipate that low interest rates and accelerating pension costs will continue to spur USPF POB and OOB issuance.
|Issuer||State||Rating date||Amount (mil. $)||Pension plan||Issuer type||Security pledge|
|Apache Cnty||AZ||May 2021||15||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|Arizona Fire and Medical Auth||AZ||Mar 2021||38||PSPRS||Protection District||Lease appropriation|
|Bullhead City Fire Dist||AZ||Feb 2021||35||PSPRS||Protection District||Lease appropriation|
|Casa Grande||AZ||May 2021||63||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|Central Arizona Fire and Medical Auth||AZ||Feb 2021||58||PSPRS||Protection District||Lease appropriation|
|Coconino County||AZ||Apr 2021||18||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|Copper Canyon Fire and Medical Dist||AZ||Feb 2021||7||PSPRS||Protection District||Lease appropriation|
|Cottonwood||AZ||Apr 2021||20||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|Douglas||AZ||Apr 2021||39||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|Glendale||AZ||May 2021||253||PSPRS||Local government||Lease appropriation|
|Golder Ranch Fire Dist||AZ||Jan 2021||28||PSPRS||Protection District||Lease appropriation|
|Highlands Fire District||AZ||Jan 2021||9||PSPRS||Protection District||Lease appropriation|
|Kingman||AZ||Apr 2021||39||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|Oro Valley||AZ||Apr 2021||18||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|Pima County||AZ||Apr 2021||300||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|Pinetop-Lakeside||AZ||Apr 2021||7||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|San Luis||AZ||Apr 2021||9||PSPRS||Local government||Pledged revenue|
|Superstition Fire and Medical District||AZ||Jan 2021||29||PSPRS||Protection District||Lease appropriation|
|Tempe||AZ||May 2021||364||PSPRS||Local government||Lease appropriation|
|Verde Valley||AZ||May 2021||10||PSPRS||Local government||Lease appropriation|
|Auburn||CA||Sep 2021||18||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Buena Park||CA||Sep 2021||96||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Central Marin Police Authority||CA||Mar 2021||27||CalPERS (M/S)||Protection District||GO|
|Chula Vista||CA||Sep 2021||349||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Commerce||CA||Aug 2021||30||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Corona||CA||Aug 2021||283||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Corte Madera||CA||Aug 2021||19||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Covina||CA||Aug 2021||73||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Downey||CA||Aug 2021||114||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|El Segundo||CA||Jul 2021||152||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Huntington Beach||CA||Jul 2021||364||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Livermore Area Rec & Park Dist||CA||Apr 2021||13||Alameda County ERA||Park District||GO|
|Manhattan Beach||CA||Jul 2021||91||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Monterey Park||CA||Jul 2021||109||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Orange||CA||Jun 2021||286||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Red Bluff||CA||Jun 2021||20||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Redondo Beach||CA||May 2021||213||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||Lease appropriation|
|San Anselmo||CA||Jun 2021||9||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|San Fernando||CA||Jun 2021||40||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Sanger||CA||Jun 2021||22||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Santa Ana||CA||Jun 2021||421||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Santa Cruz County||CA||Jun 2021||124||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Stanislaus Consolidated Fire Proctection Dist||CA||Mar 2021||11||CalPERS (M/S)||Protection District||GO|
|Whittier||CA||May 2021||144||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Willows||CA||May 2021||9||CalPERS (M/S)||Local government||GO|
|Naugatuck Borough||CT||Jul 2021||61||Employee & Firemen's Plans||Local government||GO|
|West Hartford||CT||Jun 2021||324||Local plan||Local government||GO|
|Addison Fire||IL||Apr 2021||38||Local plan||Protection District||GO|
|Bensenville Fire Protection District No. 2||IL||Mar 2021||15||Local plan||Protection District||GO|
|DuQuoin||IL||Aug 2021||8||City Police/Fire Plans||Local government||GO|
|Elmwood Park||IL||Jul 2021||63||City Police/Fire Plans||Local government||GO|
|Geneseo||IL||Jul 2021||4||Police (SE)||Local government||GO|
|Wheaton||IL||Jun 2021||50||Local Police & Fire plans||Local government||GO|
|Calhoun Cnty||MI||Sep 2021||24||Local plan||Local government||GO|
|Ishpeming||MI||Jul 2021||9||MERS||Local government||GO|
|Roosevelt Park||MI||Jun 2021||3||MERS||Local government||GO|
|Vassar||MI||Jun 2021||5||MERs||Local government||GO|
|Westland||MI||Jun 2021||82||MERS||Local government||GO|
|Bridgeton||MO||Nov 2021||14||Local plan||Local government||Appropriation|
|Portland Public Schools||OR||Jan 2021||397||OPERS||School District||GO|
|Dauphin||PA||Aug 2021||55||Local plan||Local government||GO|
|Upper Chichester Township||PA||Aug 2021||32||Local pension and OPEB||Local government||GO|
|Norfolk||VA||Jun 2021||211||Local plan||Local government||GO|
|PSPRS-- Public Safety Personnel Retirement System. CalPERS--Calfiornia Public Employees' Retirement System. ERA--Employees' Retirement Association. KPERS--Kansas Public Employees Retirement System. MERS--Municipal Employees' Retirement System. OPERS-Oregon Public Employees' Retirement System. OPEB--Other postemployment benefits. GO--General obligation.|
- Pension Brief: POBs See Increasing Activity In Low-Interest-Rate Environment, Oct. 14, 2020
- OPEB Brief: The Credit Impacts Of OPEB Obligation Bonds, March 11, 2019
- Pension Obligation Bonds' Credit Impact On U.S. State And Local Government Issuers, Dec. 6, 2017
This report does not constitute a rating action.
|Primary Credit Analysts:||Todd D Kanaster, ASA, FCA, MAAA, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4490;|
|Andy A Hobbs, Dallas + 1 (972) 367 3345;|
|Secondary Contacts:||Alyssa B Farrell, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4184;|
|Daniel Golliday, Dallas 214-505-7552;|
|Christian Richards, Washington D.C. + 1 (617) 530 8325;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org.