articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210823-economic-research-how-u-s-infrastructure-investment-would-boost-jobs-productivity-and-the-economy-12085911 content esgSubNav
In This List

Economic Research: How U.S. Infrastructure Investment Would Boost Jobs, Productivity, And The Economy


Global Macro Update: 2024 Is All About The Landing


Economic Research: Economic Outlook Emerging Markets Q1 2024: Challenging Global Conditions Will Constrain Growth


Economic Research: Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2024: Cooling Off But Not Breaking


Economic Outlook Canada Q1 2024: Growth Is Set To Continue Slowing

Economic Research: How U.S. Infrastructure Investment Would Boost Jobs, Productivity, And The Economy

As stimulus checks work their way through the system, the Biden Administration is looking to further strengthen the U.S. economy, in the near and long term, with an infrastructure funding bill. The two major parties have each proposed an infrastructure bill. This leaves the Biden Administration with having to decide whether to embrace a bipartisan infrastructure plan, or somewhat go it alone through the reconciliation process, which requires a slim majority in the Senate to pass bills.

Given these two options, the question has moved from will it pass, to how big a plan will it be?

Taking that into account, we updated our projections on what impact a $1 trillion investment would have on the U.S. economy through 2030.

Fortunately, the U.S. economy looks a lot better than in May 2020, when we did our last infrastructure analysis (see "Infrastructure: What Once Was Lost Can Now Be Found--The Productivity Boost," published May 6, 2020). But with an improving economy, there are higher costs of production, making our 2020 multiplier less feasible today. Recognizing that commodity prices are high today, if, indeed, they are "transitory" as the Fed and we believe, prices would be lower when the shovel hits the ground.

With that said, we believe the multiplier today would still be above its 1.0x neutral mark--or, in dollar terms, the project will create more in economic activity than it would cost. Our current analysis estimates a 1.4x multiplier from the $1 trillion infrastructure investment. The investment would add $1.4 trillion to the economy over the project's time frame, with more benefits later, assuming the project was productivity generating.

Economic Recovery: A Faster Return To Pre-Pandemic Growth

Over the long run, the infrastructure investment will likely provide the productivity boost needed to help get the expansion back on track. It will essentially steepen the slope of the curve, with the infrastructure scenario catching up to the pre-pandemic economic expansion at a faster rate than the no infrastructure scenario. The investment would also add as much as $1.7 trillion to U.S. GDP growth over the decade (see chart 1).

The infrastructure growth path is steeper than the no infrastructure growth path but remains much shallower than pre-2008 U.S. growth, highlighting the scars left behind from both the Great Recession and the pandemic.

Chart 1


Jobs: Over 880,000 Added By 2030

In our analysis, we found the infrastructure project would create 883,600 more jobs by 2030--many middle-class jobs--in construction, engineering, and accounting. This will likely help offset some of the impact of COVID-19 on the jobs market, providing a lifeline to the millions of unemployed workers, including many long-term unemployed, who were displaced by it.

Wallets also will be thicker, with per capita personal income in 2030 $100.50 (10.5%) larger than in the no infrastructure scenario. On top of an already large household savings surplus from quarantine (about $2.4 trillion above its 2019 average), more jobs with fatter paychecks will help propel households to spend an additional $677 billion over the eight-year period.


Productivity: A Potential Long-Term Boost

An economy's productive capacity and output typically increase once infrastructure is built and absorbed into the economy. We estimate the infrastructure investment will lift private-sector productivity by 10 basis points, on average, each year.

Overall, infrastructure investment, if done wisely, leads to increased productivity and, thus, to economic growth. Indeed, public infrastructure investment could "crowd in" private investment, with every dollar spent having a multiplier effect. If the project was implemented wisely, the multiplier from the infrastructure investment would be larger than the money spent. That said, the CBO notes in its August 2021 report on physical infrastructure that deficit financing would mitigate the positive effects on the economy of investments in infrastructure.

This investment leads to the productivity effect, which would likely increase future investment and jobs long after a project has ended. In our analysis, business investment increases by an additional $1.7 trillion over the eight-year period in the infrastructure scenario. Under the CB0 assumption that the infrastructure boost to private-sector productivity will be in place for another seven years, we expect the business investment lift would continue, all else equal.

For evidence of this, look no further than Dwight D. Eisenhower's Interstate Highway System. Costing about $500 billion in today's dollars, it has clearly paid for itself given all the products and people that travel on its 48,000 miles of roads on any given day. Ike's project is reportedly estimated to have a multiplier equal to 6x--or, for every dollar spent, the U.S. got six dollars back.

Economic Growth: Begin Takeoff

We expect the $1 trillion infrastructure investment, in its entirety, would continue to boost productivity seven years after the spending was completed, in line with the CBO's infrastructure analysis in August 2021. (After that, the productivity effect will slowly diminish over time as the stock of public capital depreciates, though regular maintenance will help extend its life.) That productivity boost would likely lift our estimated real potential (maximum sustainable) GDP growth by 10 basis points, on average, over the eight-year horizon, lifting average growth on an annual basis to 2.1% from around 2.0% over that period. According to the CBO's economic projections in July 2021, it expects potential economic growth, excluding infrastructure, to slow to just 1.7% by 2030. With that said, an extra infrastructure-driven lift to 1.8% for potential growth would be welcome news.

Even with a possible $1 trillion boost in spending, public spending on infrastructure as a share of GDP would remain near record lows (see chart 2). From 1947-1973, when growth in the stock of public capital, which is used to build and maintain U.S. infrastructure, averaged 4.5% in real terms, productivity growth averaged more than 2.6%. But, from 1974-1995, real growth in public capital stock slowed to an average of just over half that, with average productivity growth, at 1.5%, losing over one full percentage point. And, after the 3% productivity boost from 1996-2005, resulting in large part from significant private investment in internet connectivity, productivity growth fell further, averaging just 1.1% from 2011-2020.

Chart 2


U.S. GDP growth over the past 10 years, through 2019, has struggled at around 2.3%--one-third the rate of 1959 when the Interstate Highway System was built. Even when factoring in the pandemic and recovery boost, the 10-year growth trend through 2022 would remain at 2.3%. While the near-term burst in economic activity is expected to reach a multidecade high, we see the likely short-lived demand-driven reopening surge lasting through next year. In our forecast, growth will once again slow to just 1.8% by 2024 after the reopening surge and absent infrastructure.

In our analysis, we estimated that, with a multiplier of 1.4x, infrastructure investment would still add an additional $1.4 trillion to the economy over the project's time frame, with more benefits later, assuming the project was productivity generating. The type of project matters when measuring its economic gains.

Transportation infrastructure for highways has been measured to have a multiplier of around 2.0x, according a 2012 San Francisco Fed study. And according to a March 2021 IMF study, estimated multipliers associated with green spending, which make up a noteworthy share of proposed infrastructure investment in both the BPI and Democratic proposals according to our calculations, are also considered to have higher multipliers than those associated with non-eco-friendly expenditure, depending on sectors, technologies, and horizons. These imply that a greener approach may be a win for both the U.S. economy and the planet.

The views expressed here are the independent opinions of S&P Global's economics group, which is separate from, but provides forecasts and other input to, S&P Global Ratings' analysts. The economic views herein may be incorporated into S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings; however, credit ratings are determined and assigned by ratings committees, exercising analytical judgment in accordance with S&P Global Ratings' publicly available methodologies.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

U.S. Chief Economist:Beth Ann Bovino, New York + 1 (212) 438 1652;

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back