- The supply shortage (primarily in semi-conductors) faced by the auto sector is evident across economic activities facing consumers and producers.
- Retail sales came in stronger than expected in June and would have been even stronger had it not been for the decline in auto sales.
- The auto-related drag played out in manufacturing as well, with manufacturing gains in aerospace and related transportation equipment as well as primary metals more than offset by a 6.6% monthly drop in auto manufacturing.
- Headline and core CPI jumped 0.9% over the previous month, bringing second-quarter headline and core CPI annual inflation to 4.8% and 3.7%, respectively, close to our forecasts of 4.7% and 3.6%. More than one-third of the uptick in core CPI in June from May was from a 10.5% increase in the price index for used cars and trucks.
Retail sales were much stronger than expected in June but were close to what most expected once adjusted for the downward revision for May. Sales rebounded 0.6% in June and were up 1.3% excluding autos. Core sales--headline sales excluding autos, gas, and building material, which are directly accounted for in GDP calculations--were up 1.3% in June after falling 0.6% the month earlier. Eating/drinking establishment sales rose a solid 2.3% following the prior month's increase of 3.7%, now back above the prepandemic high.
For the second quarter as a whole, core retail sales were up close to 14%, but when mapping into real consumer spending, or "volume" terms (these retail sales numbers are in nominal terms), the growth is only half as impressive given the relatively high CPI inflation during the quarter. Core retail sales combined with auto sales is a good proxy for goods consumption (which is about one-third of total consumption), so June's retail sales suggest that goods consumption growth likely peaked in the first quarter. Even as real goods consumption stalled in the second quarter, the strength in the spending rebound of services (illustrated by the restaurants and bars sales in the retail sales report) will likely still bring second quarter real consumer spending growth close to our forecast of 11.2% (quarter-over-quarter annualized).
Autos Holding Back Industrial Production
While weakness in vehicles and parts sales continued (declining another 2.0% in June after having declined 4.6% in May) in retail sales data, the auto-sector related drag also played out in industrial production. Industrial production increased only 0.4% in June, which was a tad below the consensus expectation. The monthly gain was driven by mining (1.4%) and utilities (2.7%), offset by a 0.1% decline in manufacturing, where supply chain problems continued to weigh on auto output.
Gains in manufacturing of aerospace and related transportation equipment as well as primary metals were more than offset by a 6.6% monthly drop in auto manufacturing. Motor vehicle production continued to seesaw--up one month, down another--throughout this year as the short supply of semiconductor (a much-needed input) continued to pose problems. On the bright side, the New York Fed's Empire Index rose to a record in July, an early indicator of factories working to fulfill orders to restock those depleted inventories. Business inventories rose 0.5% in May following a revised 0.1% in April, which helped the business inventories to sales ratio tick up to 1.26 in May from a nine-year low of 1.25 in April.
The pace of inventory accumulation has clearly been slower than we had anticipated in the second quarter. Combined with non-residential construction, which is tracking another quarter of decline, our GDP forecast for 11.6% annualized growth in the second quarter may be on the optimistic side when preliminary estimate comes out near end-July (see calendar of data release in table 2).
The Consumption Basket Costs More in June
The jump in June headline and core Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation caught everyone's attention again, with headline and core prices rising 0.9% from a month earlier, translating to a rise of 5.4% and 4.5%, respectively, compared to June 2020 (see chart 2). In the second quarter, when the reopening of the economy was in full swing with steadily declining restrictions and increasing vaccinations, headline and core inflation averaged 4.8% and 3.7% respectively, close to our forecasts of 4.7% and 3.6%. (see "Economic Outlook U.S. Q3 2021: Sun, Sun, Sun, Here It Comes" June 24, 2021).
The price categories highly visible to households--energy and food--were up by 24.5% and 2.4%, respectively, over the past 12 months. Stripping out the generally volatile energy and food component, the uptick in core CPI (79% of the consumer basket) was mainly a result of higher vehicle prices, with the price index for used cars and trucks rising 10.5% in June from May and accounting for more than one-third of the overall price increase. Reopening-related goods and services, such as airline fares, event tickets, and apparel, also contributed to the rise in prices. Idiosyncratic supply constraints and price normalization due to the reopening has continued to contribute more to the recent spike in inflation compared to last year than anything else (see chart 3).
Auto-Related Supply Issues Pushed Prices Up
One outsize driver for the sharp consumer price hike can be found on the supply side. Higher costs of production are passed through to consumers, with automobiles and related goods and services contributing to a considerable portion of the price jump.
The Producer Price Index for final demand increased by 1% in June, increasing 7.3% on an unadjusted basis compared to the previous year. Almost 60% of the jump in producer prices came from a 0.8% increase in prices for final demand service, with the margins for automobiles and automobile parts retailing rising by 10.5%, exactly the same as the rise in the prices of used cars and trucks, signaling that bottlenecks in vehicle production (due to a shortage of semiconductors, which are essential to the production of integrated circuits or chips) have made substitutes of new vehicles more expensive. Against the backdrop of fewer vehicle sales in the second quarter, the hike in vehicle prices has mostly been a supply issue in the past three months.
Considering supply chains, we could see that the major contributors to the price increase in June are also auto-related. Nearly one-fifth of the rise in the price index of processed goods for intermediate demand can be traced to a 6.2% jump in prices for steel mill products, and 30% of the rise in the index of services for intermediate demand came from a monthly increase of 13.9% in the prices for metals, minerals, and ores wholesaling.
In fact, auto-related supply chain issues emerged as the major driver of price increases in the second quarter. From April to June, the contribution to headline CPI inflation from auto-related goods and services averaged 20%, much higher than the average of 3.7% in the first quarter. At this point, it is hard to say when this supply issue might get resolved--it could take much of this year and perhaps some time through next year for the resulting chips to work their way through the supply chain products.
Near-Term Inflation Expectation Picked Up, But Long-Term Expectation Stabilized
As gasoline and food prices resurged since February, consumer short-term inflation expectations jumped around in the range of 4.2%-4.8%: rising to 4.6% in May, dipping to 4.2% in June, and hitting 4.8% in early July (compared with 2.5% precrisis), due to the high visibility of these prices in daily life. However, long-term inflation expectations from the financial markets' point of view seem to have stabilized, with the five-year forward looking inflation rate expected five years from now, a reflection of financial market participants' long-term inflation expectations (five to 10 year time horizon), increasing at a slower pace since February and retreating from its peak in May. Long-term market expectations stood at 2.3% as of June, while medium-term (five-year horizon) average inflation expectations were a bit higher at 2.5%. Clearly, the markets don't believe in the staying power of current inflation handles.
While the pick-up in inflation and short-term inflation expectations is mostly due to surging reopening demand and supply bottleneck issues, the stabilization of long-term inflation expectations may reflect improvements in monetary policy credibility. The Federal Reserve describes the current hike in prices as "transitory", and signaled in its July Monetary Policy Report that its policy stance is not likely to change unless long-term inflation expectations exceed the level "consistent with the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) longer-run inflation goal".
How Have U.S. Small Businesses Recovered?
As the economy reopens from the once in a lifetime pandemic, small businesses in the U.S. are slowly getting back to normal. Small businesses, which constitute nearly 97% of total U.S. businesses (firms with less than 100 employees), were the most impacted by social distancing restrictions. As half of the U.S. population has already received at least one dosage of the vaccine, while new COVID-19 variants are starting to challenge the health systems in many developed and emerging market countries, the new $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan (ARP) is providing emergency support to localities, people, and hard-hit small businesses.
For the Federal, state, and local governments, supporting small businesses during the pandemic remains a priority to broaden the economic recovery. Around $1 trillion has already been deployed as relief for small businesses since the pandemic struck the country last summer. However, it is unclear whether the historic mobilization of resources has been adequate or whether the funds have reached the targeted businesses. According to the Census Bureau's weekly Small Business Pulse Survey (for the week ended July 11, 2021), 44.3% of the businesses surveyed stated they haven't received financial assistance from any source since Dec. 27, 2020. Meanwhile, 41.7% of businesses surveyed stated they have received financial assistance under they Paycheck Protection Program, up from 30.3% since the week ended Feb. 21, 2021.
On the other hand, the survey also pointed out that the effect of COVID-19 on small businesses started to recede as the pace of vaccinations accelerated and new cases dropped, which allowed the authorities to lift the restrictions on businesses, particularly high-contact services. Nearly 24.4% of businesses surveyed stated they experienced a "large negative impact" from the pandemic (as of survey week ended July 11), which was as high as 51% in April 2020 and 30.7% in January 2021. This shows how effective the unprecedented fiscal and monetary measures were at helping the businesses overcome the challenges quickly. Nonetheless, the survey also pointed out the impact on high-contact services is still significantly higher than the national average by sector. For instance, 51.3% of businesses surveyed in accommodation and food services still see a large negative impact from the pandemic, followed by 43.1% in entertainment, and 29% in transportation, compared to a national sector average of 24.4%. However, we continue to see steady improvements in the sentiments of these touch-sensitive sectors as the economy reopens. Employment in these high-contact services also increased substantially in the past couple of months.
|Review of U.S. Economic Indicators|
|Release Date||Measurements||Apr-21||May-21||Jun-21||Jul-21||Level year ago||Year-over-year|
|Four-week moving average of initial claims||7/15/2021||In 000s||621.0||428.8||394.0||382.5||1,384.3|
|All employees, total nonfarm||7/2/2021||Change in 000s||269.0||583.0||850.0||4,846.0|
|All employees, total private||7/2/2021||Change in 000s||226.0||516.0||662.0||4,807.0|
|Average hourly earnings of all employees, total private||7/2/2021||m/m,%||0.7||0.4||0.3||3.6|
|Average weekly hours of all employees, total private||7/2/2021||Hours of work||34.9||34.8||34.7||34.6|
|Total nonfarm private payroll employment||6/30/2021||Change in 000s||621.9||886.1||691.5||4,349.8|
|Labor force participation rate||7/2/2021||%||61.7||61.6||61.6||61.4|
|Job openings: total nonfarm||7/7/2021||Mil.||9.2||9.2||5.5|
|Consumer spending and confidence|
|Personal income||6/25/2021||m/m, %||(13.1)||(2.0)||2.8|
|Real disposable personal income||6/25/2021||m/m, %||(15.1)||(2.8)||(2.3)|
|Personal Consumption Expenditures||6/25/2021||m/m, %||0.9||0.0||18.9|
|Personal saving rate||6/25/2021||%||14.5||12.4||24.7|
|Total vehicle sales||7/2/2021||Mil.||19.1||17.5||15.8||13.4|
|University of Michigan: Consumer Sentiment||6/25/2021||Index||88.3||82.9||72.3|
|Advance retail sales: retail trade and food services||7/16/2021||m/m, %||0.9||(1.7)||0.6||18.0|
|Industrial Production: total index||7/15/2021||m/m, %||0.0||0.7||0.4||9.8|
|Industrial Production: manufacturing (NAICS)||7/15/2021||m/m, %||(0.4)||0.9||0.0||9.9|
|Capacity Utilization: Total Index||7/15/2021||Index||74.6||75.1||75.4||68.7|
|Current General Business Conditions; Diffusion Index for New York||7/15/2021||Index||26.3||24.3||17.4||43.0||17.2|
|Chicago Fed National Activity Index||6/21/2021||Index||(0.2)||0.3||4.6|
|Current General Activity; Diffusion Index for Federal Reserve District 3: Philadelphia||7/15/2021||Index||50.2||31.5||30.7||21.9||24.1|
|New privately owned housing units started: total units||6/16/2021||Mil.||1.5||1.6||1.1|
|New privately owned housing units authorized in permit-issuing places: total units||6/23/2021||Mil.||1.7||1.7||1.3|
|New privately owned housing units completed: total units||6/16/2021||Mil.||1.4||1.4||1.2|
|Monthly supply of houses in the United States||6/23/2021||Months||5.0||5.0||5.0|
|Total construction spending: total construction in the United States||7/1/2021||m/m, %||0.1||(0.3)||7.5|
|Trade balance: goods and services, balance of payments basis||7/2/2021||Bil.||(69.1)||(71.2)||(54.9)|
|Exports of goods and services, balance of payments basis||7/2/2021||Bil.||204.7||206.0||146.1|
|Imports of goods and services: balance of payments basis||7/2/2021||Bil.||273.8||277.3||201.0|
|Import Price Index (End Use): all commodities||7/15/2021||m/m, %||0.8||1.4||1.0||11.2|
|Export Price Index (End Use): all commodities||7/15/2021||m/m, %||1.2||2.2||1.2||16.8|
|Producer Price Index by Commodity: final demand||7/14/2021||m/m, %||0.6||0.8||1.0||7.1|
|Producer Price Index by Commodity: final demand: finished goods less foods and energy||7/14/2021||m/m, %||0.6||0.6||0.7||3.6|
|Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: all items in U.S. city average||7/13/2021||m/m, %||0.8||0.6||0.9||5.3|
|Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: all items less food and energy in U.S. city average||7/13/2021||m/m, %||0.9||0.7||0.9||4.5|
|Personal Consumption Expenditures: chain-type price index||6/25/2021||m/m, %||0.6||0.4||3.9|
|Personal Consumption Expenditures excluding food and energy (chain-type price index)||6/25/2021||m/m, %||0.7||0.5||3.4|
|Data retrieved on July 16, 2021. Data retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/ m/m--Month over month, last three months selected. Yearly data is either year-over-year change (%) or level value year ago. Total nonfarm private payroll employment is from ADP.|
|Economic Release Calendar|
|20-Jul||Housing starts (mil.)||Jun||1.560||1.5855||1.572|
|22-Jul||Initial claims (000s)||Week of 7/17/21||340||350||360|
|Existing home sales (mil.)||Jun||5.84||5.94||5.80|
|26-Jul||New home sales (mil.)||Jun||0.80||0.80||0.77|
|27-Jul||Durable goods orders (%)||Jun||1.1||1.0||2.3|
|28-Jul||Advance trade in goods (bil. $)||Jun||(88.5)||(88.1)||(88.2)|
|29-Jul||GDP advance report (%)||Q2||11.6||8.0||6.4|
|Chain price index avance report (%)||Q2||4.3||5.3||4.3|
|30-Jul||Employment cost index (%)||Q2||0.9||0.9||0.9|
|Personal Consumption Expenditure (%)||Jun||1.0||0.6||0.0|
|U. Mich. Consumer Sentiment (final)||Jul||84.0||83.2||85.5|
The views expressed here are the independent opinions of S&P Global's economics group, which is separate from, but provides forecasts and other input to, S&P Global Ratings' analysts. The economic views herein may be incorporated into S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings; however, credit ratings are determined and assigned by ratings committees, exercising analytical judgment in accordance with S&P Global Ratings' publicly available methodologies.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
|U.S. Chief Economist:||Beth Ann Bovino, New York (1) 212-438-1652;|
|U.S. Senior Economist:||Satyam Panday, New York + 1 (212) 438 6009;|
|Contributor:||Shuyang Wu, Beijing|
|Research Contributor:||Arun Sudi, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: email@example.com.