articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210426-european-financial-stability-facility-6437818 content esgSubNav
In This List

European Financial Stability Facility


CreditWeek: How Are Funds Using Net Asset Value Loans?


Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research


Your Three Minutes In Banking: When Rates Drop, GCC Banks' Profitability Will Follow


Four Nedgroup Funds Assigned South African National Scale Fund Credit Quality And Volatility Ratings

European Financial Stability Facility

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Credit Highlights

The ratings on the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF; AA/Negative/A-1+) reflect that its obligations are fully covered by irrevocable, unconditional, and timely guarantees provided by sovereigns rated 'AA' or higher.  As of Dec. 31, 2022, the EFSF had €197 billion of debt outstanding, which was 106% covered by guarantees from sovereigns with long-term ratings of 'AA' or higher. Importantly, the ratings do not depend on the quality of the EFSF's borrowers, namely Greece, Ireland, and Portugal.

The EFSF no longer engages in new programs.   On Oct. 8, 2012, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) replaced the EFSF's activities. However, the EFSF continues to manage existing loan programs and will continue refinancing maturing debt, backed by explicit guarantees from the participating sovereigns.


The negative outlook on the EFSF reflects primarily our negative outlook on France, the entity's second-largest guarantor as defined by its capital contribution, and the resulting possibility that coverage of the EFSF's liabilities by guarantors rated 'AA' or above could fall below 100% within the next 18-24 months.

Downside scenario

We would lower the rating on the EFSF if we lowered those on France or any other member state guarantor currently rated 'AA' or above to below 'AA' and if we believed the remaining guarantees and liquid securities rated 'AA' or above were no longer sufficient to cover all of the EFSF's funding instruments.

Upside scenario

We could raise our long-term rating on the EFSF if we were to raise the ratings on France or one or more member state guarantors rated 'AA' or below, to higher than 'AA' so that the entity's obligations were fully covered at the higher rating level by comparable guarantees and collateral.


Guarantors of the EFSF's bond issuances include most eurozone member states, among which we rate France and Belgium 'AA'. The coverage of outstanding EFSF long-term debt by outstanding guarantees from sovereigns rated 'AA' or higher is currently greater than 100%. While the coverage of the guarantees of EFSF long-term debt from sovereigns rated 'AA' or higher is currently greater than 100%, it would fall below 100% should we lower our long-term rating on France below 'AA'. Of importance, the ratings do not depend on the quality of the EFSF's borrowers, namely Greece, Ireland, and Portugal.

Our ratings on the EFSF hinge on the creditworthiness of its guarantors because the EFSF's paid-in capital is minimal. All EFSF funding instruments are severally (but not jointly) guaranteed by eurozone members, except those that stepped out--namely Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and Cyprus as of Dec. 21, 2013--and Latvia and Lithuania, which did not step in. As of year-end 2022, the EFSF had disbursed €185.5 billion in loans to Ireland, Portugal, and Greece through its assistance programs, with the majority (€141.8 billion) going to Greece.

The second Greek program ended in June 2015, with a total outstanding balance of €130.9 billion to the EFSF (€10.9 billion in EFSF bonds were returned). The subsequent program for Greece in August 2015 came from the ESM and ended in August 2018. Ireland's program concluded in December 2013, with the EFSF having disbursed a total of €17.7 billion. Portugal's program ended in May 2014, with the EFSF having disbursed a total of €26 billion. In October 2019, Portugal made an early repayment to the EFSF of €2 billion. The EFSF currently has €172.6 billion of outstanding loans. The weighted-average tenor at inception of Greece's debt to the EFSF was extended to 42.3 years as a result of the medium-term relief measures approved for the country by the EFSF's board of directors in November 2018. The weighted-average loan tenor is 20.8 years for Portugal and Ireland. The first principal repayments will be in 2023 for Greece, 2025 for Portugal, and 2029 for Ireland.

We expect the EFSF will continue refinancing maturing debt well ahead of the due dates, backed by the explicit guarantees from participating sovereigns. In our view, despite recent uncertainties regarding the eurozone's economy due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the EFSF is unlikely to need to call on the sovereign guarantees in the foreseeable future, since we expect Portugal, Greece, and Ireland will make their loan repayments in full and on time.

The EFSF achieved its target issuance of €19.5 billion for 2022 and targets issuance of €20 billion for 2023. It uses the ESM's "Early Warning System" to anticipate any shortfall risk related to countries where it has loan exposure. If a cash shortfall were to materialize, each guarantor would be required to pay an amount up to their individual guarantee commitment corresponding to the shortfall. For this reason, our 'BB+' long-term sovereign credit rating on Greece, the EFSF's main debtor, does not affect our ratings on the EFSF. We analyze the strength of the guarantees and the reliability of the mechanisms in place to assure timely payment by guarantors if the guarantees were called on.

As of Dec. 31, 2022, the EFSF had €193.2 billion of debt securities in nominal amounts outstanding. The EFSF's bill program was replaced by the ESM's bill program in January 2013. The EFSF has benefited from low funding costs since its inception, and we expect it will continue to do so. Under the Basel framework, EFSF bonds are considered to have 0% risk weights. Furthermore, the European Central Bank has included the EFSF in its expanded public-sector asset purchases program, which started again in November 2019 after halting in December 2018, and ended in July 2022.

We rate the EFSF's long-term debt issues 'AA'. For supranational institutions where we are confident all financial obligations benefit systemically from shareholder guarantees--such as in cases where the entity is in wind-down mode, and such guarantees may be called on in advance to meet maturing obligations--we may equalize the issuer credit rating with the issue rating determined as per paragraphs 113-116 of "Multilateral Lending Institutions And Other Supranational Institutions Ratings Methodology," published Jan. 31, 2022.

Key Statistics

Table 1

European Financial Stability Facility--Selected Indicators
Member Ratings EFSF amended contribution key (%) 'AAA' guarantee coverage on long-term issues (%) 'AA+' and above guarantee coverage on long-term issues (%) 'AA' and above guarantee coverage on long-term issues (%) 'A-1+' coverage on short-term issues (%)


AA+/Stable/A-1+ 3.0 -- 4.8 4.8 4.5


AA/Stable/A-1+ 3.7 -- -- 6.0 5.6


BBB/Stable/A-2 -- -- -- -- --


AA-/Negative/A-1+ 0.3 -- -- -- 0.4


AA+/Stable/A-1+ 1.9 -- 3.1 3.1 2.9


AA/Negative/A-1+ 21.9 -- -- 35.1 33.1


AAA/Stable/A-1+ 29.1 46.7 46.7 46.7 44.1


BB+/Stable/B -- -- -- -- --


AA-/Positive/A-1+ -- -- -- -- --


BBB/Stable/A-2 19.2 -- -- -- --


AAA/Stable/A-1+ 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4


A-/Stable/A-2 0.1 -- -- -- --


AAA/Stable/A-1+ 6.1 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.3


BBB+/Stable/A-2 -- -- -- -- --


A+/Negative/A-1 1.1 -- -- -- --


AA-/Stable/A-1+ 0.5 -- -- -- 0.8


A/Stable/A-1 12.8 -- -- -- --
Total N/A 100.0 57.0 64.9 106.0 101.2
Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, and Portugal have stepped out as EFSF guarantors. Ratings as of Jan. 30, 2023. *Unsolicited ratings. N/A--Not applicable

Related Criteria

Related Research

Primary Credit Analyst:Pierre Hollegien, Paris + 33 14 075 2513;
Secondary Contacts:Marta Saenz, Madrid + 34 91 788 7231;
Alexander Ekbom, Stockholm + 46 84 40 5911;
Additional Contact:Sovereign and IPF EMEA;

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at


Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in