Rating Action Overview
- Rio Tinto PLC's announced continuation of its New Zealand Aluminum Smelter (NZAS) until at least Dec. 31, 2024, provides certainty to the country's electricity market over the medium term at least.
- New Zealand-based Meridian Energy Ltd.'s (Meridian) earnings were materially exposed to the exit of NZAS due to its substantial lower South Island generation. The extension of NZAS's operations relieves pressure on Meridian allowing time for the sector to expand alternative demand avenues and to lift existing transmission constraints previously anticipated to strand generation.
- On Feb. 24, 2021, S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Meridian to stable from negative. At the same time, we affirmed our 'BBB+' long term issuer credit rating and 'A-2' short-term issuer credit rating on the company.
- The stable outlook reflects the certainty provided to Meridian under expected status quo operating conditions. As such, we anticipate Meridian to operate with debt to EBITDA of 2.4x-2.8x over the next two to three years subject to the finalization of capex plans and shareholder distributions.
Rating Action Rationale
We revised the outlook on Meridian to stable to reflect our view that Rio Tinto's decision to continue operations at its NZAS smelter until at least Dec. 31, 2024, eases previously forecast pressure on earnings and energy margins. In July 2020, Rio Tinto announced its NZAS smelter would exit New Zealand in August 2021. We anticipated this to exert significant pressure on Meridians earnings and energy margins. NZAS consumes 40% of Meridian's electricity generation and if it were to have left existing transmission constraints would have impeded the movement of excess power northward. The decision to stay relieves this pressure.
Meridian and New Zealand's electricity sector now has certainty and time to address lower South land transmission constraints. The agreement reached between Rio Tinto and the company provides price certainty for 572 megawatts (MW) and underpins demand in the lower South Island until at least June 30, 2022. The agreement also provides certainty for a minimum of 400MW until Dec. 31, 2024, with Rio Tinto having the right to relinquish 172MW with six-months notice from Jan. 1, 2022. This provides the sector with time to overcome existing transmission constraints in the lower South Island. Works to address these constraints are currently underway and scheduled for completion in mid calendar 2022. This will allow the export of all excess power if NZAS was to relinquish 172MW under the new agreement, cushioning the impact on lower South Island wholesale prices.
We expect Meridian's debt-to-EBITDA metrics to trend at around 2.4x-2.8x over the next two to three years and remain within our tolerances for the 'BBB+' rating. This compares to our previous forecast of 2.2x-3.4x under an August 2021 smelter exit scenario. Our forecast anticipates drier hydrological conditions in fiscal 2021 followed by a reversion to mean hydrology from fiscal 2022 onward. The extent of moderation or appreciation in wholesale prices in addition to final capital expenditure (capex) plans and distributions will determine whether Meridian's credit metrics will perform at the upper or lower end of our forecast.
Meridian is proceeding with its Harapaki windfarm with debt funding to drive the weakening in Meridian's metrics from fiscal 2022. We note that this project has now received the Meridian board's approval. The current consent requires work to be substantially underway by at least September 2023. We anticipate total project cost of around NZ$395 million based on the current windfarm scale. Dependent on project timelines and commissioning, we anticipate some benefit to flow from late fiscal 2024 with full benefit in fiscal 2025. We anticipate that Meridian will maintain adequate liquidity through its growth capex phase and put in place appropriate additional bank facilities to support this.
Management to exercise a degree of dividend flexibility throughout the peak capex phase of Harapaki. We believe that management will maintain its ordinary distribution policy of 75%-90% of free operating cash flow (FOCF) over time during the construction of Harapaki. Throughout this period we also anticipate that management may exercise some flexibility in relation to ad hoc special dividends. If undertaken this would offset some of the moderation in ordinary dividends due to peak capex providing a degree of stability in dividend cents per share. We have incorporated special dividends into our forecasts over the next few years to reflect this expectation.
The stable outlook reflects the certainty provided to Meridian under expected status quo operating conditions. Meridian's cost competitive position in New Zealand's generation-dispatch merit order and appropriate risk management strategy support the ratings. Under mean hydrological conditions and forecast growth capex we anticipate Meridian will sustain debt to EBITDA of about 2.4x-2.8x over the next two to three years. We also expect the company to prudently manage any domestic and offshore growth opportunities, and adequately balance these against distributions.
All else being equal, a downgrade would require Meridian's debt to EBITDA to approach and sustain at 3.0x. This is most likely to occur if Meridian was to undertake material debt-funded capex not balanced by moderation of distributions, beyond that incorporated into our current expectations.
The rating would also come under pressure if the government reduced its ownership to a minority stake or circumstances lead us to review the level of government support.
In our opinion, upside potential is minimal because we expect Meridian to actively manage its growth and balance sheet to maintain some rating headroom to withstand any hydrological risk. However, a debt to EBITDA of less than 2.0x and polices and commitment by Meridian to maintain metrics at such a level would indicate upward rating momentum.
Meridian is the largest generation company in New Zealand, producing approximately 31% of the country's electricity. Similar to Mercury NZ Ltd. and in contrast to Genesis Energy and Contact Energy, all of Meridian's generation comes from renewable sources. The company has a broad spread of hydro stations with seven distinct facilities and five wind farms across New Zealand.
With about 11% of the retail market, Meridian is New Zealand's fourth-largest electricity retailer. The company has about 291,000 customers, including those under its Powershop brand. Meridian's largest customer is the Tiwai Point New Zealand Aluminum Smelter (NZAS, ultimately owned by Rio Tinto), which covers about 40% of Meridian's generation output under a price guarantee contract. The smelter accounts for approximately 12% of total national generation output and is under a strategic review by its majority owner, Rio Tinto PLC.
Our Base-Case Scenario
- EBITDA margins of 23%-25% in line with historical trends in fiscal 2021 and dependent on prevailing market conditions thereafter.
- Below average hydrological conditions in fiscal 2021 offset by elevated generation prices; Average hydrological conditions thereafter.
- Flat demand growth over fiscal 2021.
- Continued operation of NZAS until at least December 2024.
- Stay-in-business capex of around NZ$55 million to NZ$65 million over the forecast period.
- Harapaki windfarm capex of around NZ$350 million to NZ$400 million spread over fiscals 2022, 2023, and 2024.
- All in cost of debt of around 5.2%-5.5% over the next few years.
- Underlying returns to shareholders within company guidance of between 75% and 90% of FOCF. In addition we anticipate management will prudently manage the payment of any special dividends from fiscal 2021 onward, balancing this against its capex pipeline.
|Meridian Energy--Key Metrics*|
|--Fiscal year ended June 30--|
|EBITDA margin (%)||24.6||25.5||23-25||23-25||23-25|
|Debt to EBITDA (x)||1.7||1.8||2.0-2.2||2.4-2.6||2.6-2.8|
|FFO to debt (%)||44||39.4||38-40||31-33||27-29|
|*All figures adjusted by S&P Global Ratings. a--Actual. e--Estimate. f--Forecast.|
Ratings Score Snapshot
Issuer Credit Rating: BBB+/Stable/A-2
Business risk: Satisfactory
- Country risk: Low Risk
- Industry risk: Moderately High Risk
- Competitive position: Satisfactory
Financial risk: Intermediate
- Cash flow/Leverage: Intermediate (Standard volatility table)
- Diversification/Portfolio effect: Neutral (no impact)
- Capital structure: Neutral (no impact)
- Liquidity: Adeqaute (no impact)
- Financial policy: Neutral (no impact)
- Management and governance: Satisfactory (no impact)
- Comparable rating analysis: Neutral (no impact)
Stand-alone credit profile: bbb
- Sovereign rating: AAA
- Likelihood of government support: Moderate (+1 notch from SACP)
- General Criteria: Group Rating Methodology, July 1, 2019
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology: Ratios And Adjustments, April 1, 2019
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Reflecting Subordination Risk In Corporate Issue Ratings, March 28, 2018
- General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Long-Term And Short-Term Ratings, April 7, 2017
- General Criteria: Rating Government-Related Entities: Methodology And Assumptions, March 25, 2015
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global Corporate Issuers, Dec. 16, 2014
- Criteria | Corporates | Industrials: Key Credit Factors For The Unregulated Power And Gas Industry, March 28, 2014
- Criteria | Corporates | General: Corporate Methodology, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Country Risk Assessment Methodology And Assumptions, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Methodology: Industry Risk, Nov. 19, 2013
- General Criteria: Methodology: Management And Governance Credit Factors For Corporate Entities, Nov. 13, 2012
- General Criteria: Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011
Meridian Energy Ltd.
Meridian Finco Pty Ltd.
|Ratings Affirmed; CreditWatch/Outlook Action|
Meridian Energy Ltd.
|Issuer Credit Rating||BBB+/Stable/A-2||BBB+/Negative/A-2|
Meridian Finco Pty Ltd.
|Issuer Credit Rating||BBB+/Stable/--||BBB+/Negative/--|
S&P Global Ratings Australia Pty Ltd holds Australian financial services license number 337565 under the Corporations Act 2001. S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings and related research are not intended for and must not be distributed to any person in Australia other than a wholesale client (as defined in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act).
Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column.
|Primary Credit Analyst:||Alexander Dunn, Melbourne + 61 (3) 96312120;|
|Secondary Contact:||Parvathy Iyer, Melbourne + 61 3 9631 2034;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org.