- Governments across Europe are finding it more difficult to control the COVID-19 pandemic, as numerous new virus variants have emerged which appear more transmissible and have led to concerns over vaccine efficacy. This has prompted a new round of lockdowns and tighter travel restrictions.
- European air passenger confidence and demand have understandably faltered, depressing the rebound in European air traffic and likely delaying a more meaningful recovery to after the crucial summer season. This will fuel further cash burn and debt accumulation for European airlines and airports and could cause some downgrades.
- If the EU can accelerate vaccine production and rollouts, we think it could achieve widespread immunization by the end of the third quarter, enabling air passenger traffic to recover more meaningfully later in 2021. Consequently, we assume 2021 European air passenger traffic will recover only to 30%-50% of 2019 levels.
New travel restrictions, implemented to curb the spread of newly identified COVID-19 variants that appear to transmit more easily, came as a further blow to Europe's aviation industry. More-severe lockdown measures eroded consumer confidence, putting S&P Global Ratings' previous air traffic assumptions of a meaningful summer recovery in Europe at risk.
Although vaccine rollouts offer an encouraging path back to more normal levels of social and economic activity, implementation is proving more complex than expected. Most EU countries got off to a slow start and the new variants have led to concerns over vaccine efficacy. Under our base-case scenario, we now expect the recovery of European air traffic to be weaker, and slower, in 2021 than we previously forecast.
Our calculations suggest the EU could vaccinate 70% of its adult population against COVID-19 by late July 2021, although any significant delays could see this slip to August or September 2021 (see "EU Could Meet 70% Vaccination Target By Late July If Production Steps Up," published on Feb. 11, 2021). Governments might, however, relax restrictions significantly once the more-vulnerable demographic groups have been vaccinated, which could be by the end of April.
Europe's Airlines Are Mostly Grounded, For Now
The outlook for air travel remains uncertain, but we currently forecast that European air passenger traffic and revenue in 2021 will be only 30%-50% of 2019 levels (measured by revenue passenger kilometers, RPKs). As in 2020, European air traffic is likely to underperform global air traffic in 2021, given the prevalence of international travel in the region. Cross-border travel is currently complicated by the multitude of different government travel restrictions and policies, as well as varying COVID-19 infection rates and the unpredictable prevalence of new variants. According to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) nearly three-quarters of European passenger air traffic was international in 2019, compared with just 16% in North America. A large portion of European international travel (79%) was intraregional.
Our estimate for global traffic and revenue in 2021 is unchanged at 40%-60% of 2019 levels. The global average is boosted by regions where domestic traffic makes up a greater share of the total than in Europe, or where the pandemic is less severe and restrictions less strict. The impact on domestic traffic, while severe, has been far less than that on international travel. Our global forecasts remain largely aligned with those of the International Air Transport Association (IATA, the trade association for the world's airlines). IATA's base-case forecast for 2021 is that global air traffic will be about half of pre-pandemic (2019) levels.
In 2022, we still expect European and global traffic to recover to 70%-80% of 2019 levels, rising to 2019 levels by 2024 (see "As COVID-19 Cases Increase, Global Air Traffic Recovery Slows," published on Nov. 12, 2020).
Air Traffic Recovery Depends On Curtailing The New Variants
Under IATA's downside scenario, global traffic could be as low as 38% of 2019 levels in 2021. This could occur if more severe travel restrictions are needed to curb the spread of new COVID-19 strains. Although vaccine rollouts have created an encouraging path back to more normal levels of social and economic activity, new variants have led to concerns over vaccine efficacy and could depress consumer confidence.
The U.K.'s rollout has quickly gathered pace, but the EU's program started more slowly. Nevertheless, we estimate that most developed economies could achieve widespread immunization by the end of the third quarter, with some emerging markets reaching this target only in 2022. Under our base-case forecasts, we expect the U.K. and the U.S. to vaccinate 70% of its adult population against COVID-19 by July 2021, in which case some important transatlantic routes could open well before then.
However, bookings for the crucial summer period, typically made in the first half of the year, will be lower than we previously expected. Air passenger traffic could see a more meaningful recovery only in the fourth quarter.
Traffic Still Likely To Return To Pre-Pandemic Levels Around 2024
For now, we still assume that air travel in Europe is unlikely to return to pre-pandemic levels until at least 2024. In the longer term, growth in the sector is likely to be slower than the 4%-5% per year we saw over the past couple of decades. The pandemic has accelerated moves toward working from home and use of digital technologies, which could have a lasting effect on demand for business travel. Companies are also likely to rethink their cost saving efforts to support a green agenda, depressing demand further.
The pandemic caused the toughest crisis the aviation industry has ever faced. Global passenger air traffic, measured by RPKs, was just one-third of the 2019 level in 2020 (source: IATA Air Passenger Market Analysis). International RPKs fell to just a quarter of the 2019 level, while domestic travel almost halved. Overall, Europe suffered the worst, losing 70% of its traffic.
It's a similar story when we look at passenger numbers, although they are less affected than RPKs, which include distance travelled. For European airports, we prefer this metric over RPKs, because airport charges are based on passenger numbers. ICAO estimates that European passenger numbers will be about 64%-74% lower in the first half of 2021 than in the same period in 2019.
Where To Look For Signs Of Recovery
There is evidence of a huge amount of pent up demand for travel; when travel corridors have opened throughout the pandemic, bookings have typically surged for certain destinations. We anticipate that the first to recover will be the low-cost and ultra-low-cost airlines and leisure carriers, which serve short-haul networks. Primary airport hubs and legacy carriers will take longer to recover because they rely more heavily on long-haul destinations and business travelers. Although airports that have large origin and destination markets will continue to attract traffic, their network model may change. Airports that depend on full-service carriers, secondary hubs, and hubs serving long-haul networks may shrink.
Both airlines and airports have got better at managing their cost bases and cash burn levels. In addition, some weaker players have downsized operations or even exited the industry. Thus, the surviving operators may find their market positions strengthen over the longer term.
Careful Liquidity Management Remains Key For Airlines
The delayed recovery will fuel further cash burn and debt accumulation for European airlines. Given the much tighter travel restrictions so far this year, net global bookings for future travel were down 70% year-on-year in January 2021, according to IATA, which spells trouble for airlines' cash positions. Given that airline balance sheets are now considerably more heavily leveraged, the accumulation of yet more debt is not good news. Further downside to European airline ratings therefore remains possible, but will likely be selective, bearing in mind the multi-notch downward adjustments made last year (see table 1). Ratings could come under pressure, notably if we perceive increased pressure on liquidity.
|Long-Term Ratings And Outlooks On European Airlines|
|Company||Feb. 1, 2020 Issuer credit rating (SACP)*||Feb. 18, 2021 Issuer credit rating (SACP)*||Notches downgraded during COVID-19 (SACP)*|
Ryanair Holdings PLC
British Airways PLC
|BBB/Stable (bbb-)||BB/Negative (bb-)||3 (3)|
International Consolidated Airlines Group, S.A.
Deutsche Lufthansa AG
|BBB/Stable (bbb)||BB-/Negative (b+)||4 (5)|
Air Baltic Corp AS
|BB-/Stable (b)||B/Stable (ccc+)||2 (2)|
Turk Hava Yollari A.O.
|B+/Stable (bb-)||B/Negative (b)||1 (2)|
|B+/Stable||B-/Stable||7 § (Lowest rating 'SD')|
Transportes Aereos Portugueses, SGPS, S.A.
|BB- (prelim)/Stable (b)||B-/Watch Neg (ccc)||3 (3)|
|*Stand-alone credit profile (SACP): Shown where lower than the issuer credit rating. The SACP is our opinion of an issuer's creditworthiness in the absence of extraordinary support or burden. §SAS AB was downgraded to 'SD' (selective default) on Oct. 28, 2020, on its completed debt restructuring. On Dec. 7, 2020 it was upgraded to 'B-'.|
Balance sheets may have weakened considerably, but for the stronger rated airlines, we do not expect a delay in the recovery to change the shape of their balance sheets in the medium-to-longer term. That said, more prolonged cash burn means that we will continue to monitor liquidity positions extremely closely. Additional government support or new equity could help protect airlines from downside risks.
Almost all our European airline ratings have negative outlooks (with one on CreditWatch with negative implications). This signals clear downside risk to the ratings, which could stem from new COVID-19 variants, particularly if vaccine efficacy is lowered and global travel restrictions are prolonged or tightened. The pandemic is a problem that must be solved globally because there is a risk that more transmissible variants could emerge from countries that have slow or limited vaccine rollouts.
Depressed Traffic Will Stretch European Airports' Credit Ratios Further
Our revised traffic forecasts lead us to expect many European airports to post weaker ratios in 2021. That said, we have not changed our view of the shape and pace of recovery after 2022. We expect ratios to strengthen over the medium term as the recovery unfolds, especially for airports that have greater flexibility to manage cash burn and limit rising debt during the pandemic. Given their strong market position and often-regulated earnings, we typically use a longer forecast horizon for airports than that for most airlines, which are more cyclical.
Most European airports have been downgraded since the start of the pandemic, which should limit the likelihood of further downgrades. That said, all ratings have a negative outlook or are on CreditWatch with negative implications. The airports most at risk have tight financial headroom, limited flexibility to preserve credit quality, and less favorable recovery prospects. That said, our rated European airports have robust liquidity positions and can take mitigating actions like those described below.
Large-scale voluntary redundancies, mothballing of facilities, and investment in new technologies can improve airports' ability to scale down the cost base and investment budgets when traffic is low. As for airlines, when traffic returns, some of the saving could prove permanent, measured by EBITDA per passenger.
In addition to continuing furlough schemes and relief in business rates, European airports have called on the European Commission to relax state aid rules. Rated European airports, apart from those in the U.K., are government-related entities, and could benefit from some form of direct state support.
Other credit-supportive measures such as equity or quasi-equity injections, hybrid capital, or optimizing their capital structure (for instance, through reprofiling of swaps).
Regulation remains difficult to predict in 2021 because long-term traffic is difficult to forecast. Some regulators have publicly recognized that investors in airports need more protection. We therefore expect to see more traffic-sharing mechanisms in future, as well as the use of tools to balance the potential tariff increases, such as phasing of tariffs, compensation via regulatory depreciation, and others.
Stable earnings from other sources can also support airports. Examples include renting real estate or international operations in geographies that have a high share of domestic traffic such as Brazil or India. That said, if the terms of the post-pandemic minimum revenue guarantees are less favorable, revenue from nonaeronautical sources could fall.
|Long-Term Ratings And Outlooks On European Airports|
|Entity||Country||Rating on Feb. 1, 2020||Rating on Feb. 18, 2021||Notches downgrade during COVID-19||Notches of lower SACP during COVID-19|
Flughafen Zurich AG
NATS (En Route) PLC
Aeroports de Paris
Royal Schiphol Group N.V.
Schiphol Nederland B.V.
Heathrow Funding Ltd.*
|Gatwick Airport Ltd.*||U.K.||BBB+/Negative||BBB/Watch Neg||1||1|
Aeroporti di Roma SpA
|*Senior secured rating.|
S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating, uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by year-end or later. We use these assumptions about vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications associated with the pandemic (see our research here: www.spglobal.com/ratings). As the situation evolves, we will update our assumptions and estimates accordingly.
- EU Could Meet 70% Vaccination Target By Late July If Production Steps Up, Feb. 11, 2021
- Industry Top Trends 2021: Transportation, Dec. 10, 2020
- As COVID-19 Cases Increase, Global Air Traffic Recovery Slows, Nov. 12, 2020
This report does not constitute a rating action.
|Primary Credit Analysts:||Rachel J Gerrish, CA, London + 44 20 7176 6680;|
|Tania Tsoneva, CFA, Dublin + 44 20 7176 3489;|
|Secondary Contacts:||Izabela Listowska, Frankfurt + 49 693 399 9127;|
|Philip A Baggaley, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 7683;|
|Beata Sperling-Tyler, London + 44 20 7176 3687;|
|Pablo F Lutereau, Madrid + 34 (914) 233204;|
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: email@example.com.