articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210108-economic-research-u-s-biweekly-economic-roundup-the-jobs-market-weakened-more-than-expected-11797592 content esgSubNav
Log in to other products

Login to Market Intelligence Platform


Looking for more?

In This List

Economic Research: U.S. Biweekly Economic Roundup: The Jobs Market Weakened More Than Expected


Economic Research: U.S. Real-Time Data: A Weaker February Likely Offset A Better-Than-Expected January


Economic Research: Europe’s Housing Market Will Chill In 2021 As Pent-Up Pandemic Demand Eases


Economic Research: Delay Risk On The Rise For Southeast Asia's Recovery


Economic Research: U.S. Biweekly Economic Roundup: A Stronger-Than-Expected January Sets The Stage

Economic Research: U.S. Biweekly Economic Roundup: The Jobs Market Weakened More Than Expected

Hit To Payroll Jobs Is Worse Than Expected

With people staying home for the holidays amid the surge in COVID-19, many workers were left out in the cold this holiday season. Nonfarm payroll jobs declined for the first time in this recovery, following seven consecutive months of improvement. While the headline was ugly, upward revisions to the prior two months cancel out most of the December jobs lost, leaving a net 5,000 jobs lost. That is still worse than expected, just not as bad.

Chart 1


The pace of job gains was already slowing since the initial pop during summer, with the average monthly job growth over the last three months at 283,000. This pace of job gains would be considered excellent under normal circumstances, but not now. Payrolls over the May-December period have reclaimed only 56% of the jobs lost in March and April. At the current pace, it would take more than three years just to get back to the February 2020 jobs level. This would still be far short from full employment accounting for population growth.

There Was A Disproportionate Impact Sectorwise

The magnitude of the decline in December payrolls is not nearly as large as it was in March 2020 (-1.4 million) and April 2020 (-20.8 million) when lockdown restrictions were much more stringent and affected almost all sectors. The current COVID-19 restrictions are more targeted on people-sensitive sectors, so it is not surprising that most sectors were spared from payroll job declines. The hit to jobs was concentrated in the leisure and hospitality sector (-498,000), with bars and restaurants falling 372,000. Employment in this most vulnerable-to-pandemic sector remains 23% lower than February levels.

State and local government payrolls declined as well--by 51,000, placing them 1.4 million below the February 2020 level, reflecting the significant pressure this sector has been under from damages to states' finances from the pandemic. Employment in the component of local government that excludes education declined by 32,000, and state government education lost 20,000 jobs.

Chart 2


Most other major sectors--that are sensitive to the business cycle--added jobs, with professional and business services (+161,000), retail (+121,000), and construction (+51,000) leading the way.

The pandemic has disproportionately affected jobs concentrated in industries where people generally aren't able to work from home. This has naturally manifested into the leisure and hospitality sector taking the largest hit. December was no different. This pandemic-vulnerable sector is disproportionately made up of the lowest wage workers, which also meant that, in December, average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls increased by 23 cents to $29.81 as these lower paid workers went off payrolls (which raised the average hourly earnings estimates).

This dynamic was also evident in the aggregate weekly payrolls--a proxy for wages and salaries that combines employment, average weekly hours worked, and average hourly earnings--which still had an increase (of 0.4% month over month, placing it just 1.4% below its February 2020 level) even as the leisure and hospitality sector saw its aggregate weekly payrolls decline by 5.5%. Fortunately, the extension of pandemic unemployment benefits will help cushion the blow for those who continue to struggle to find a job.

Improvement In Unemployment Rate Stalls

The weakening labor market recovery was evident in the data published from a separate household survey as well. The unemployment rate held steady at 6.7% in December, just as labor force participation did at 61.5%. If we adjust the unemployment rate to reflect BLS's misclassifications and the fall in labor force participation since February, the unemployment rate would be closer to 10%. The employment-to-population ratio did not improve for a third consecutive month.

On a more encouraging note, the shares of permanent unemployed declined for the first time in eight months, to 38.9% from 44.0%. On the flip side, the rise in layoffs basically represented the rise in the number of temporary layoffs, suggesting many of last month's unemployed workers expect to be recalled.

Chart 3


Still, the share of long-term unemployed continued to rise, which is not a good sign because long-term unemployment tends to have scarring effects, thus increasing chances of weakening labor market attachment in the medium- to long-term recovery, directly affecting participation rates (lower than implied by population ageing). The unemployment rate may then seem better than what it really is.

Chart 4


Implications For Growth Forecast And Policy Assumptions

It is clear the pandemic controls pace of the recovery in the near term and there is a long way to full recovery. At S&P Global, we don't expect the unemployment rate to reach its precrisis low until sometime in 2024.

We have said since June that it's not a far-fetched possibility the U.S. economy could see a COVID-19 resurgence that cripples U.S. growth. The weaker-than-expected jobs report supports our expectation that GDP will post a decline of an annualized 2.3% in the fourth quarter, and with the viral spread unabated, we worry that first-quarter growth may be weaker than our already miniscule forecast of just 0.8%.

Congress passed a $900 billion COVID-19 relief bill in late December, which extends the special emergency unemployment benefits for 11 weeks through mid-March. In addition, the $600 one-time relief checks and various other moratorium measures in the bill will go a long way to supporting growth in the first quarter as restrictions keep many businesses shuttered. The disappointing jobs report may also give the next administration and Democrat-led congress more reasons to pass additional stimulus once President-elect Joe Biden is at the White House, to help stem the tide. Indeed, an additional demand stimulus in the coming months is an upside risk to our growth forecasts published in December ("Staying Home For The Holidays," Dec. 2, 2020).

The Fed is also fully aware of the evolving risks in the labor market and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) showed in its minutes to the December policy meeting (that was published this week) that it will remain in the current accommodative stance for the foreseeable future. Consistent with our macroeconomic forecasts, we do not expect the Fed to raise rates from the current zero-bound in this cycle before sometime midway through 2024. This is in line with the Fed's latest summary of economic projections and the recently codified "inclusive maximum employment" strategy to achieving monetary policy mandate of full employment.

Table 1

Data Snapshot
Review of economic indicators released in the past two weeks (Dec. 25, 2020 - Jan. 8, 2021)
Latest period Jan-21 Dec-20 Nov-20 Oct-20 Level year ago % year-over-year
Labor market
Jobless claims (four-week moving average) 2-Jan-21 818,750 837,500 740,500 788,500 219,750
Unemployment rate (%) December 6.7 6.7 6.9 3.6
Nonfarm payrolls (change in '000s) December (140) 336 654 184
Private nonfarm payrolls (change in '000s) December (95) 417 924 164
Average hourly earnings, all employees (%, month over month change) December 0.8 0.3 0.1 5.1
Hours worked December 34.7 34.8 34.8 34.3
ADP employment (change in '000s) December (123) 304 409 167
Participation rate (%) December 61.5 61.5 61.6 63.3
Consumer spending
Total vehicle sales (units, in mil.) December 16.7 16.1 16.8 17.3
Business activity and sentiment
ISM Manufacturing Index (level) December 60.7 57.5 59.3 47.8
ISM Nonmanufacturing Index (level) December 57.2 55.9 56.6 54.9
Housing and construction
Construction spending (%, month over month change) November 0.9 1.6 3.8
Exports of goods and services (bil. $) November 184.2 182.0 210.6
Imports of goods and services (bil. $) November 252.3 245.1 251.6
Trade balance (bil. $) November (68.1) (63.1) (41.1)
Sources: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Census Bureau, Institute for Supply Management, and ADP Research Institute. Notes: Jobless claims is weekly data.

Table 2

Economic Release Calendar
Date Release For Forecast Consensus Previous
13-Jan CPI (%) Dec 0.4 0.4 0.2
CPI (excluding food and energy) (%) Dec 0.2 0.2 0.2
Treasury Budget (bil. $) Dec (200) (234) (145.3)
14-Jan Export Price Index (%) Dec 0.6 0.5 0.6
Import Price Index (%) Dec 0.6 0.6 0.1
Initial claims (000s) Wk of 1/9/21 825 800 787
15-Jan Retail sales (%) Dec 0.4 0.2 (1.1)
Retail sales (excluding auto) (%) Dec 0.0 (0.1) (0.9)
PPI (%) Dec 0.4 0.4 0.1
PPI (excluding food and energy) (%) Dec 0.3 0.2 0.1
Empire State Index Jan 4.9 5.6 4.9
Industrial production (%) Dec 0.4 0.5 0.4
Capacity utilization (%) Dec 73.5 73.7 73.3
Business inventories (%) Nov 0.6 0.5 0.7
University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment (prelim) Jan 82.0 81.0 80.7
21-Jan Housing starts (mil.) Dec 1.480 1.560 1.547
Philadelphia Fed Index Jan 10.0 12.6 11.1
Existing home sales (mil.) Dec 6.520 6.500 6.690

The views expressed here are the independent opinions of S&P Global's economics group, which is separate from, but provides forecasts and other input to, S&P Global Ratings' analysts. The economic views herein may be incorporated into S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings; however, credit ratings are determined and assigned by ratings committees, exercising analytical judgment in accordance with S&P Global Ratings' publicly available methodologies.

U.S. Chief Economist:Beth Ann Bovino, New York + 1 (212) 438 1652;
U.S. Senior Economist:Satyam Panday, New York + 1 (212) 438 6009;
Research Contributor:Arun Sudi, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, (free of charge), and and (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to:

Register with S&P Global Ratings

Register now to access exclusive content, events, tools, and more.

Go Back